Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00987
Original file (PD2011-00987.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army

CASE NUMBER: PD1100987 SEPARATION DATE: 20030220

BOARD DATE: 20120706

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (55B, Ammo Specialist) medically separated for chronic right shoulder pain. He was treated, but did not respond adequately to fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Right shoulder pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions appeared on the MEB’s submission. The PEB found the right shoulder condition unfitting, and rated it 10% IAW the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals, and was thus medically separated with a 10% disability rating.

CI CONTENTION: “The rating did not take in account my limited range of motion or that I can move my shoulder. The code should be more like 5201, I can not move my shoulder more than 80 degrees straight up. The code I was given for arthritis does not take into account the lack of motion. Also I was on narcotic pain killers for years after discharge.”

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review, as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. In this case, the right shoulder condition (shoulder pain, with decreased range-of-motion (ROM)) meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview, and is addressed below. Any other conditions are outside the Board’s scope of review, but may be eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).

RATING COMPARISON:

Army PEB – dated 20021126 VA (3 days Post-Separation) – All Effective 20030221
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Shoulder Pain 5099-5003 10% Chronic Right Shoulder Strain 5299-5201 20% 20021015
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 10% Combined: 20%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Shoulder Condition. In September 2000, the CI reported right shoulder pain after performing push-ups. He received several months of physical therapy (PT) without significant improvement. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in July 2001 showed a possible labral tear. In November 2001, he had right shoulder arthroscopy which was essentially unremarkable. He then underwent electrothermal assisted capsulorrhaphy (ETAC). Despite his treatment, the right shoulder problems persisted, and an MEB was initiated.

At his November 2002 MEB orthopedic evaluation, 16 weeks prior to separation, the CI reported right shoulder pain and decreased ROM. On exam, there was no significant muscle atrophy around the right shoulder girdle. He had well healed surgical scars consistent with his history of arthroscopy. Muscle strength testing was somewhat limited by pain, but was generally normal. All provocative tests on the right shoulder were mildly positive and painful, but there was no evidence of laxity. Three goniometric ROM evaluations were weighed by the Board in arriving at its recommendation, and are summarized below.

Goniometric ROM

Right Shoulder

PT – 24 wks. Pre-Sep

(20020905)

C&P – 19 wks. Pre-Sep

(20021015)

MEB – 16 wks. Pre-Sep

(20021105)

Flexion (180⁰ is normal) 90⁰ 90⁰ 100⁰
Abduction (180⁰ is normal) 90⁰ 90⁰ 80⁰
§4.71a Rating 20% 20% 20%

The Board carefully examined all evidentiary information available. The Army PEB and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) used different coding options for the right shoulder condition, and assigned different rating percentages. The CI’s right shoulder ROM was clearly decreased. At his November 2002 MEB exam, he forward flexed his right arm to 100 degrees (slightly above shoulder level) and he could abduct to 80 degrees (which is close to shoulder level). IAW the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), arm motion that is limited to shoulder level warrants a disability rating of 20% under diagnostic code 5201. For a higher rating, there would need to be greater limitation of motion, to midway between the side and shoulder level (45 degrees). The Board thoroughly reviewed the record and could not find sufficient evidence to support a shoulder disability rating greater than 20%. After due deliberation, and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 20% for the right shoulder condition. It is appropriately coded 5201, and meets VASRD criteria for the 20% rating level.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the right shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 20%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.

RECOMMENDATION:

The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Right Shoulder Condition 5201 20%
COMBINED 20%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20111021, w/atchs

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record

XXXXXXXXXX

President

Physical Disability Board of Review


SFMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency

(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation

for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120012296 (PD201100987)

1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Deputy Assistant Secretary

(Army Review Boards)

CF:

( ) DoD PDBR

( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01788

    Original file (PD2012 01788.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW VASRD rating guidelines. Strength and sensation was normal.MEB/PT ROM evaluation17 September 2003appears to document reduced left shoulder abduction of possibly 15 degrees but is illegible; the NARSUM noted the PT consultation as abduction 110 degrees.At the C&P exam the CI reported pain, decreased ROM, and difficulty with overhead motion. Service treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01319

    Original file (PD-2013-01319.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic neck pain continued and she was referred for a MEB.At the MEB examination (3 months prior to separation), the CI reported“spasms in her neck and flares in her neck pain,” with “herniated discs in my neck which are irreparable.”She reported that “load bearing equipment and Kevlar headgear worsen her neck pain.”The Report of Medical History (DD Form 2807) for the MEB reported the presence of herniated discs with “no surgery.”The MEB physical exam noted surgical scars on the right palm...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01896

    Original file (PD-2013-01896.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20040608 After a thorough review of the treatment record, the Board determined that the CI’s right shoulder condition was essentially non-compensable based solely on the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a codes for the shoulder and arm (5200 through 5203). Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00165

    Original file (PD 2013 00165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Shoulder Condition . X-rays of the complete left shoulder were normal.The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB rated the left shoulder condition as degenerative joint disease, 10% coded 5003,citing painful ROM.The VA rated the left shoulder pain condition 30%,coded 5201 (arm, limitation of motion) citingdecreased ROM.The Board undertook to determine a rating for the condition under the ROM code 5201.Under thiscode, for the dominant...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00180

    Original file (PD-2014-00180.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Shoulder Condition . The PEB adjudicated the left shoulder at 0% coded 5099-5003, citing degenerative arthritis with loss of joint motion due to pain alone.The VA originally rated the left shoulder at 0%,coded 5201-5010 (arm; limitation of motion-traumatic arthritis) with an increase to 10% subsequent to C&P summary examinations citing painful motion.The left shoulder limited ROM of 90 degrees supports a20%minimum rating with application of code 5201.After due deliberation, considering...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01540

    Original file (PD-2013-01540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2005 I was only medical boarded and rated 20% for my Right Shoulder. The Board considered that following the two surgeries, the CI had painful limited left shoulder ROM with evidence of posttraumatic arthritis on X-rays. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01199

    Original file (PD-2013-01199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “right shoulder instability status post two shoulder surgeries”as unfitting, rated 10%.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Physical Disability Board of Review DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRSSubj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONSRef: (a) DoDI 6040.44

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01881

    Original file (PD2012 01881.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded severe left shoulder pain, status post (s/p) surgery as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated chronic pain left shoulder as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and theUS Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01048

    Original file (PD-2013-01048.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Recurrent Left Shoulder Pain Condition. The CI had a left shoulder injury prior to enlisting into the US Navy;however, his symptoms improved and the shoulder returned to normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01932

    Original file (PD-2013-01932.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20051115 The Board first considered examination probative value noting “passive” ROM performed at the NARSUM and therefore, not in compliance with VASRD criteria. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in...