Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00125
Original file (FD-2015-00125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (I.AST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)     GRADE
(b) (6)
TYPE     I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION      ADDRESS ANO OR ORGMllZATION OFCOUNSEL
(b) (6(b) (6)

YES      No
x


VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY

(b) (6X +

X + X + X +
X +
ISSUES   A94.53   INOCX NUMBER     A75.00   EXHIBITS SUBMIITIDTOTHI BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICAT!ON FOR REV[EW OF DISCHARGE     
LETTER Of NOTIF!CATIO!:<
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

Hf.ARJKG DAT£     CASE NUMBER

23 Jul 2015      FD-20 15-00125
APPUCANT'SlSSUE A1<t> Tl16 OOARD'SDECISIONAL RATIONALll ARE DISCUSSED ON TifE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONAJ..'E.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance wi th/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR .







+ CHANGE REASON A D AUTHORITY TO SECRETA RIAL AUTHORITY
(b) (6-

        ··- ... ....-..,................           - · ...--.. - .,. -v ,.         -
TO:      FROM:
SECRETARY OF THE A l R FORCE PERSONN'El. COUNCl L
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVI EW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40      1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING. JRD FLOOR
RANDOLPH A FB, TX 78 150-4742    A.DREWSAFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00        (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2015-00125
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The change of reason and authority for discharge is denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a Under Other Than Honorable discharge for Conduct Trialable By Court­ Martial

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Charge Sheet dated 17 July 2003. His misconduct included robbery from a Moroccan national , and by means of force and violence, stealing a wallet, wrist watch, silver bracelet, and five Euro notes of a value of more than $100.00; unlawfully striking said person on the arm and eye, and dragging him on the ground; and wrongfully using marijuana.

The applicant contends that he was misguided with depressed thoughts. He submits that he used substances which impaired his judgment. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong, or that in his two years and two months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. Aside from his drug use, the Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization, reason for the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

Inview of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged .

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00240

    Original file (FD-2015-00240.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable,tochangethereasonandauthority forthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereview becompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.Thechangeofreason andauthority...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00386

    Original file (FD-2014-00386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonalappearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00042

    Original file (FD-2015-00042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebefore theDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00444

    Original file (FD-2014-00444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00656

    Original file (FD-2014-00656.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AJR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)(b)(6)GRADF.TYPE I PERSONAL APPEARANCEx I RECORD REVIEW CONSELNAME or COUr\Stl.ANOORORGANl7,ATIONADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEi.YESNoxMEMBERSITTINGVOTEOFTHE BOARDHONGE\.IUOTHC'OTHERDENY(b)(6)xxxxxISSUES A94.53 INDEXNUMBER A66.001'XHJB11SSUBMlTTEOTO THEBOARD1ORDERAPPOfNTINGTllEBOARD2APPLICATION FOR REVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4BRIEF OFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDlrlONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00335

    Original file (FD-2014-00335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00221

    Original file (FD-2015-00221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDNAME OFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,fCRSTMJDDLElNfTlAL)(b) (6)GRADETYPE GEN I PERSONALAPPEARANCEx I RECORDREVIEW COUNSELNAMEOF COUNSELANDORORCANIZATIONADDRESSANDOR ORCANIZATION OFCOUNSELYESNoxMEMBER SITTINGVOTEOFTHEBOARDHONGENUOTHCOTHERDENY(b) (6)xxxxxISSUESA94.53 INDEX NU!\.·1BER A66.00EXHIBITS SUBMITTEDTO...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00075

    Original file (FD-2015-00075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgrade ofdischarge to Honorable,achange to thereason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicant wasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00077

    Original file (FD-2015-00077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicant received aGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Drug...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00023

    Original file (FD-2015-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable andtochange thereason andauthorityforthedischarge. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.