Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00768
Original file (FD-2014-00768.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVJEW BOARD H EARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MrDDLE INITIAL)      GRADE

(b) (6)
TYPE GEN         I        PERSONAL A PPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSU   NAME OF COUNSEL ANO OR ORGANIZATION      ADDRESS All"D OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE :BOARD
MEM BER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x
x x x
ISSUES   A94.53   INOL'X NUM8£K    A66.00   EXBJBITS SUBMIITED TO T BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVTEW OF DISCHARGE
LEITER OF NOTLF!CATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDrNG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HCARING DATE     CASE NllMOER

14 Aug 2015      FD-2014-00768
Al'PUCJ\NT'S ISSUE AND lliE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACFreD Alll FORCE DfSCHAROE REV1EW BOARD DECISIONAL AATIONALE.

Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR.








-
(b) (6)


INDORSEMENT      DATE: 811712015         I
TO:      rROM:
SCR!:TARV        THE AIR FORCE PF;RSONNl':L COUNCii.
AIR FORCC DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40      153 COMMAND OR. EE \VIN(;, JRO FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742      ANDRE.IVS AFB, MO 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-Y2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE Nt;)IBER

FD-2014-00768

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING : The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions and Drug Abuse

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant 's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant 's record of service included one General Court-Martial conviction for attempting to wrongfully introduce "ecstasy" onto an armed forces installation and attempting to wrongfully inhale HFC­ l 34A with the intent to become intoxicated; two Letters of Reprimand for breaking phase and curfew (2x); four Letters of Counseling for failing room inspections (3x), losing a military ID and failure to report to assigned details after being briefed several times.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on June 12, 2000) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant; however, this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.


Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD 2013 00189

    Original file (FD 2013 00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARlNGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FfflSTMlDOLE INITIAL)PERSONAL APPEARANCE COIJNSt:L NAME OFCOUNSELANDOR ORGANIZATION 1 1 YES No xGRAOE AFSN/SSAN RECORDREVIEWADORESSANOORORGANIMTIONOFCOUNSEL VOTE OFTHEROAROMEMBER SITTING HON UOTllCOTHER DENY ISSLESA94.JlINDEX NUMBERA67.10EX1H8ITS SUBMITTEDTO THEBOARDORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETrEROF NOTlrJCATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'S...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00189

    Original file (FD-2013-00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARlNGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FfflSTMlDOLE INITIAL)PERSONAL APPEARANCE COIJNSt:L NAME OFCOUNSELANDOR ORGANIZATION 1 1 YES No xGRAOE AFSN/SSAN RECORDREVIEWADORESSANOORORGANIMTIONOFCOUNSEL VOTE OFTHEROAROMEMBER SITTING HON UOTllCOTHER DENY ISSLESA94.JlINDEX NUMBERA67.10EX1H8ITS SUBMITTEDTO THEBOARDORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETrEROF NOTlrJCATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'S...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00220

    Original file (FD-2014-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsfor achangetothereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:The Boarddeniesthechangeofreasonandauthorityfordischargeandchangeofreenlistmentcode.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00164

    Original file (FD-2015-00164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischargeandchangeofreenlistment code. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforUnsatisfactoryParticipation TheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminethepropriety andequityofan applicant'sdischarge,isauthorizedtochangethecharacterization...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00158

    Original file (FD-2009-00158.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Ss) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL TYPE GEN Ue HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x a ©) EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BO, ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00102

    Original file (FD-2014-00102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableTheapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: Applicant received aGeneraldischargeforMisconduct: ConductPrejudicial toGoodOrderand...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00702

    Original file (FD-2014-00702.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable,tochangethe reason andauthorityforthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge,thechangeofreasonand authority...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00559

    Original file (FD-2008-00559.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMERER SIFTING VOTE OF THE BOARD GEN 7 HON UOTHC ‘OTHE R DENY issuRS K95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 ‘EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD: piel ie | - ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE __ LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE _ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 17 Dec 2009 FD-2008-00559 Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00592

    Original file (FD-2014-00592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeof the discharge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderandDiscipline.TheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00281

    Original file (FD2008-00281.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I.