Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00097
Original file (FD-2014-00097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARJNG RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INffiAL)
GRADE
AFSN/SSAN



X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND ORORCANIZATIONor COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

GEN      UOTHC

OTHER    DENY

x

x
x
*        x





ISSU&S



A94.55





lNDtX NUMJER



A66.00
*        x

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETIER OF NOTlFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE    CASE NUMBER

28Aug 2014       FD-2014-00097


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
*Narrative Reason







.... ---- ----

,.._. ---.,:.. ---       '- - .. ....;.._, ' .:...:     ·- .      . · . ..,. '..  ':·..-.,.. L , , - •..,.._ ') - ,..·- . 1 "     .        .. ;•• _.:._, - .-.._:-. · ._..


::,


, ::>·.... :

T-0:

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
FROM:
SECRETAltY or TIU!:AIR FORCE HRSO '!L COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARC£ REVIEW BOARD W! COMMANDDR. EllWING.JRD l'LOOR A'.IDR£WS AJ'B. lllD 10762-70'1


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00097

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge and change to the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by applicant substantiates an impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. However, based upon the record, the Board grants the change of the narrative reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct: Drug Abuse

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant's record of service included one Letter of Reprimand for the use of spice.

Although not explicitly stated, applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He believes that while everyone else was served an Article 15 and had an opportunity to accept or turn down the Non-judicial punishment and demand a court-martial, he was only issued a Letter of Reprimand with only the option to respond to the allegation in writing. It is Commander's discretion to issue the appropriate level of punishment for misconduct, absent of clear abuse of authority, it is not our job to second guess command's authority in maintaining good order and discipline.

Applicant also contends that his discharge was improper because his command relied on false information provided by witnesses that claim he smoked spice with them during a timeframe he was deployed. The Board relies on the presumption of regularity but after a thorough review of applicant's record, due to several mitigating facts surrounding the alleged misconduct, the Board concluded the narrative reason and authority would be more accurately reflected as Secretarial Authority.

The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the reason for the discharge is more accurately described as Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00604

    Original file (FD-2013-00604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable, tochangethereasonand authority forthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00401

    Original file (FD-2014-00401.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,and tochange thereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereview becompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00431

    Original file (FD-2014-00431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00690

    Original file (FD-2014-00690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseThe AirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underits...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00193

    Original file (FD-2014-00193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge tohonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbytheapplicantsubstantiatesan inequityorimpropriety...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00633

    Original file (FD-2014-00633.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00642

    Original file (FD-2014-00642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00097

    Original file (FD-2009-00097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN SRA a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Ree NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ESET VOTE OF THE BOARD. a

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00193_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00193_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableandtochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestsfortheupgradeofthedischarge,andtochangeofreasonandauthorityfor dischargearedenied. ISSUE: Applicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00011

    Original file (FD-2014-00011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.