Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00487_13
Original file (FD-2013-00487_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE


AFSN/SSAN


X        RECORD REVIEW
A DD RESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

OEN      UOT H C
OTHER    DENY
x x x
x
x


ISSUES

A9 3 . 1 7
A9 3 . 21

INDEX N U MBER

A6 6 . 00


1       
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2       
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTE R OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL 'S RE LEASE T O THE BO ARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT S SUBMITTED A T TIME O F P E RSON AL AP PE ARAN CE
TAP E RECO RD ING OF P ERS O N AL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE    CASE NUMBER

1 7 Oct 20 1 3      FD - 20 1 3-00487


Case heard in Washingto n , D . C .

Advise applicant of the decis io n of the Board , th e right to a personal appearance with/without counsel , and the r i ght to su bmit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and vo tes will be made available to t he a pplicant at the applicant' s request.











SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST , SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
S E C R E T A RY O F TIJE ADI FORCE PERSO N N E L COUNOL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAJlD ISJS COMMAND DJl, EE WING , J R.I> FLOOR ANDRl!WS AFB , MD 207 62- 700 1


AFHQ FORM 0-2077 , JAN 00         ( E F-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00487

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant contends that in July 2012 he returned home after spending eighteen months in Italy and was tired, stressed, and dealing with a bad headache when he made bad choice by using marijuana. He also stated that he understands that drug use has no place in the military ·and regrettably made the wrong choice on how to cope while in the military. The applicant also talked about his medical history concerning a malformation in the brain and the surgery that has subsequently followed his diagnosis. At the time of discharge the applicant was no longer undergoing a Medical Evaluation Board review and was no longer in code 37 status, which made him free for separation, PCS, or TDY. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana on or about 5 July 2012 at or near La Habra California and was drunk and disorderly on or about 16 July 2013 at or near Aviano Air Base, Italy. According to AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54, Misconduct: Drug Abuse, drug use is incompatible with military service and Airman who abuse drugs one or more times are subject to discharge. Drug abuse for the purpose of this regulation is the illegal, wrongful, or improper use, possession, sale, transfer, or introduction onto a military installation of any drug. This includes improper use of prescription medication. The term drug includes any controlled substance in schedules I, II, III, IV, and V of Title 21 U.S.C., Section 812. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his two years and nine months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate.

In addition to the non-judicial punishment for Drug Abuse, applicant received a Letter of Reprimand. His misconduct included wearing an n unauthorized item, specifically a tongue ring. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.


Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00478_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00478_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADEAFSNfSSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSAHi>ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELISSUESA93.01INDEXNUMBERA67.10HON GEN UOTHC OTHERA93.07 A66.00 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'S RELEASETOTHEBOARDADDmONALEXHIBITSSUBMilTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGllt:ARJNGDATE CASENUMBEROSSep2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00031

    Original file (FD-2014-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEWAFSN/SSANADDRtSSANDORORCA'.llZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY x .• xISSUESA92.35INDEXNUMBER A66.00 mintssUB1tP'f! '1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMTITEDAT TIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£ARl1'CDATE CASENUMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00023

    Original file (FD-2014-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    S • BR550CSTREETWEST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX781504742SECRETARYOfTHEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCILAIRFORCEDlSCHARCERCVIEW80ARI)1535COMMANDOR,£EWINC,JROFLOORANDREWSAFB,MD!07'1-7001AFHQFORM0-2077,JAN00 (EF-V2) Previous AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDDECISIONALRATIONALE CASENUMBER FD-2014-00023GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00693

    Original file (FD-2013-00693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEI ITlAL) GRADEX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORCAl'UZATIONOF COUNSELxMEMBERSITTINGGENUOTHCOTHER DENY xA94.53A93.17INDEXNllMltRA66.00x"'* EXHIBITS SUDMITIEDTOTHEBOt\RDORDERAPPOINTINGTMEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINCDATE CASENllMB&R...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00521

    Original file (FD-2013-00521.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRsrMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUJ\'SELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY ISSUESA93.23INDEXNUMBERA66.00A67.0S1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTiiEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTED ATTlMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBERlOJan2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00652

    Original file (FD-2012-00652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistment code. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,viavideo teleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandRandolphAFBTexason27Jan2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00524_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00524_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00373

    Original file (FD2005-00373.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00373 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military mcmbers, and the characterization of thc discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate; however, if he can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issue, he should consider exercising his right to make a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00492_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00492_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDOR ORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSELA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMBERHON GEN UOTl;IC OTHER 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDAH CASENVMllER03Oct2013FD-2013-00492Caseheardin Washington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecision oftheBoard,theright...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00533_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00533_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANll.ATIONOFCOUNSEL Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented...