AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
Fe fA pe
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE ~ X RECORD REVIEW
mr NAME OF COUNSEL ANDO ORGANIZATION — ADDRESS AND OR RGANIZATION OF COUNSEL °
YES No
Xx
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
Xt
xe
Ke
x* 4-
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER
Aol.43
A84.00
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE _.
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL. APPEARANCE HEARING
ITEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
27 May 2010
oe tabs fe |
ATL GAL ICL
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
*Reason and Authority
+Reenlistment Code
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
wee ee RTS WA AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFH, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00190
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge and change reenlistment
code are denied.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant was discharged for unsatisfactory participation from Michigan ANG on 31 August 2000.
Applicant stated on DD form 293 that he was having family issues and had to move back home to Missouri.
Applicant further stated he tried to clear up the issue with the Michigan ANG, but a couple of months had
past and he was released from Michigan ANG. ‘The Board was unable to find any documentation regarding
the discharge. Due to lack of evidence and supporting documentation to explain the discharge, the Board
concludes that the misconduct was a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military
members. The Board relies on the presumption of regularity and finds the characterization; reason for
discharge and the reenlistment code were appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530
OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00301
Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00301 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00031
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW ue NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL OE OTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x si ice x x cre - ere ma ‘ TS SUBSITE TO THE BOARE ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER AG7.10 Se EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE B ARD A01.00 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THEBOARD |2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE __ 3...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00045
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. Upon review of the record, the Board was unable to find any documentation regarding the discharge. The Board highly recommends that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate their issue(s), that he should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00120
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00042
THE.BOARL’S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00042 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. ...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00601
DATE S0201017 TO: , FROM: SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL : AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND Dk, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFR, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00601 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00037
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW "COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION Fe ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL a ~~ | ee meses ose os foe qotEor TR ae | MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY / xX*+ X*t+ et X*+ x*t ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.05 A67.10 Jes A9?2,21 1 Revere A93.11 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE a A93.07 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00134
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15s, three Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling and three Records of Individual Counseling. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00499
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN fe SRA -_ TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 | RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION | "| ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. If | had not been there for my mother she would not be alive today.” Upon review of the record, the Board was unable to find any documentation regarding the discharge in...