Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00169
Original file (FD-2009-00169.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE

  
     
 
   

AFSN/SSAN

 

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

RECORD REVIEW

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

  
   
  

 

 

 

 

  
 
  

 

4S ek OTOP THE BOARD sip) co
HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

| ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A66.00

  

 

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

 

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00169
ae ete OS DECISIONAL RATIONALE AREDISG

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

   
              

SED ON THE ATTACTIED AIR. FORCE DISCHARGE

REVIEW BOARD D
ee

 

aa

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR,

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

  

 

 

 

 

Joeseensetyeteegs a ateatmemmmgiennerg ayy om 8 ne ome nr nnn QT oo ees 5 ARB ALUM
TO: — FROM: _——s— —
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
ays wenn enya AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFR, 1X 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00169

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds the applicant submitted no
issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the
Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant
docs submit that he made a mistake in smoking marijuana, but since then he has matured and wants to be
able to say he served honorably in the AF. The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for
Misconduct—Drug Abuse after receiving two Article 15 actions for wrongful uses of marijuana. The record
shows that the applicant initially was identified as having used marijuana when his urine, collected during a
unit drug sweep on 3 January 2005, tested positive for THC. The applicant denied knowingly using the drug
and claimed somcone had spiked his drink at a bar. On 20 January 2005, the respondent was ordered to
provide a urine sample for a follow-up drug test; his urine again tested positive for THC. The applicant
neither admitted nor denied a knowing use of marijuana on this second occasion. After review of the record,
the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his more
than six years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy for zero tolerance to drug use. The Board
further found no inequities or improprieties in the applicant’s discharge and determined the negative aspects
of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant’s performance. It concluded that
the discharge was appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged. .

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00169

    Original file (FD2006-00169.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    See attached cy of Examiner's Brief dtd 20 Jul 05. b. For your misconduct you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 8 Mar 04 (Attachment 3). For your misconduct you received an LOC, dated 21 Apr 04 (Attachment 4).

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00378_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00378_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbythe applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00139

    Original file (FD-2009-00139.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code. The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct—Drug Abuse.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00685

    Original file (FD-2013-00685.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetogeneral.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,atAndrewsAFBon 20Mar2014.Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing: Exhibit#5:CollegeTranscriptsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:ApplicantreceivedanUnderOtherThanHonorableConditions (UOTHC)dischargeforMisconduct -Drug...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0134

    Original file (FD2002-0134.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 38° FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) " Previous edition will be used. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0134 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0134 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB)...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00064

    Original file (FD-2009-00064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00665

    Original file (FD-2013-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00272+

    Original file (FD2006-00272+.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. Review Board: In reference to #6 on my discharge application the following issues are the reasons my status of discharge should be changed to honorable and proof of serving in Operation Enduring Freedom should be noted on my DD Form 214.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00550

    Original file (FD-2008-00550.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL bic. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Aftcr a review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his almost two years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00334

    Original file (FD-2010-00334.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for the discharge and change of reenlistment code. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct: Drug Abuse. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his two years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use.