Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00151
Original file (FD-2009-00151.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

= — se

AFSN/SSAN

 

 

 

 

 

TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE Xx RECORD REVIEW
F ithe COUNSEE " NAME OF COMJNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION _ ~~ i ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ~ a

 

       

 

        

 

OP NOTE OF THE-BOARI

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SIT TING NON GEN UOTHC
xP+
ceed = 2 =
xt
AY
XP+
ISSUES E) "
A95.00 INDEX NUMBF AG7.10
AO1.00 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
| HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
22 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00151

 

 

    
   

DARDS DECIIONAD RAMIONALE ARE DISCEE

ind.

Case heard in Washington, D.C,

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

*Reason and Authority
+Reenlistment Code

  

“INDORSEMENT DATE: ..7/23/2010
TO: FROM:
: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
2 AEIMRBG artery ay AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MO 20762-7001

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00151

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denics the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge,
and change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE:

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does
submit that he would like to have his discharge upgraded so that he may continue his education. The DRB
noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits he understood that he must receive an Honorable
discharge to receive future educational entitlements. ‘The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of
these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would
warrant an upgrade. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15s and two Letters of
Reprimand for misconduct His misconduct included misuse and failure to pay his government travel card,
failure to support dependents, failure to obey a lawlul order and pay debts, and being arrested and detained
for conduct after hours.

The Board highly recommends that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to
substantiate his issue(s), that he should consider exercising their right to make a personal appearance before
the Board. If the applicant chooses to exercise this right, he should be prepared to provide the DRB with
factual evidence of the inequity/impropriety and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any
contributions to the community.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00545

    Original file (FD-2008-00545.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSN/SSAN NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION VOTE OF MEBs GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY _ EXHIBITS SUBM ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds that neither the evidence of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00151

    Original file (FD-2014-00151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetohonorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00078

    Original file (FD-2009-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code EUR SOT a f s NE TO: FROM: ; SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL Ban EES AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD §50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00078 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00245

    Original file (FD2005-00245.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2005-00245 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD a (Former...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00151

    Original file (FD2003-00151.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCL SED THE RUTACHED Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR i San Xl aaa FAI OT ose Lee aT SAF/MRBR ‘ SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL Bees ¢ AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RP FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00281

    Original file (FD2008-00281.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00221

    Original file (FD2005-00221.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 15 Dec 78 -—- 21 Jan 79 (1 month 7 days) (Inactive). 33 SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted AL ANG as Sgt 6 Sep 91 for 3 yrs. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority FD2005-00221 for Discharge) Issue 1: My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 98 months of service with no other adverse action.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00330

    Original file (FD-2008-00330.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A93.01 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIGF OF PERSONNEL FII.E __ COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER , 10 Aug 2010 FD-2008-00330 s at HEANT S ISSUE ANI THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL Ky Case heard in Washington, D.C via video-teleconference from Randolph AFB, Texas. nen: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00049

    Original file (FD-2009-00049.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ , ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ~ | " ONGTE OF THE BOARD = ed Lai sae ae fs ay HON GEN | UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x ISSUES A93.23 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 “EXBIBITS SUBMIT EED TO THE BOARD A92,35 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A94.05 2_ [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00149

    Original file (FD-2009-00149.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X | RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL OTHER DENY x x xX x x | ISSUES A931 I INDEX NUMBER A67.90 E ! The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted...