Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00135
Original file (FD-2009-00135.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

   
 
 

   

 

 

  
 
 

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
VOTE OF THE BOARD, :
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
ai
X+
x+
X+
= a
X+
x+
ISSUES A94.06 INDE NUMBEK A67.10 XHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD. :
1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
|2_| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
05 Aug 2010 FD-2009-00135

 

 

 

  

“APBLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARIYS DECISIONAL. RA i JONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON'THE ATTACHED ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARI DECISIONAL RATIONALE.
i f ee ne ae Bh ns : PEERED : igs oe

:
Fs
aa ee i { “i

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

   

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

+ CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY

U MHINDURSE ERIN: . PE! 8/17/2010 ee
TO: FROM: N

SA LRAT: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

SAF/MRBR . f AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00135

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

After a review of the record, the Board unanimously voted to grant the relief of the requested upgrade as
discussed below.

FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief, except the Board denies the change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. However, based upon the record and evidence
provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s reason and authority for discharge inequitable.

ISSUE:

Issue 1. The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for
misconduct, namely minor disciplinary infractions. Applicant had an Art 15 for failure to obey a lawful
order, and one Letter of Counseling for failure to go to a weigh in. While the Board did not condone
applicant’s incidents of misconduct, they did feel the discharge action was inequitable when compared to
other similarly situated airmen.

Issue 2. The applicant noted that while in the Air Force he applied to be recognized as a Conscientious
Objector, an application which was denied. However, in view of applicant’s profession of Conscientious
Objector status, the Board determined the applicant’s reenlistment code should not be changed. The
applicant can still apply for a waiver from the branch of service he wishes to join, or apply to the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant’s
service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge and the reason for the discharge is more
accurately described as Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00489

    Original file (FD-2013-00489.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN x PERSONALAPPEARANCE RECORDREVIEWNAMEOF COUNSELANDORORGANIZATION ADDRESSAND ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELxMEMBER SITTING UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ X* +X*+ISSUESA94.05 A93.09 INDEX NUMBERA67.10X*+ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00354

    Original file (FD-2008-00354.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request, * CHANGE RE CODE + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 Case heard via videoteleconference between Andrews AFB, Maryland and Robins AFB, Georgia on 13 April 2010. f SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00033

    Original file (FD-2009-00033.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s reason and authority for discharge inequitable. Applicant contends he should receive an upgrade in his discharge characterization to honorable and a change in RE Code because he engaged in no misconduct while on...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00019

    Original file (FD-2009-00019.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s characterization for discharge inequitable. The DRB opined that although the two instances of misconduct were due to alcohol related incidents, the second instance of misconduct was over 14 months after the first...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00337

    Original file (FD-2008-00337.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VORDOP THE BOARD GEN UOTHC OTHER X#4 Xt Xt X*+ ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94,06 A67.10 2 2 RXnBiTs SUBMITTED 10 THE BO: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD [> (we [r fe ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00189

    Original file (FD2008-00189.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    + Reenlistment Code denied SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE AREDISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW. BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE; - ~~ Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. FINDINGS: The Board grants the change of the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00302

    Original file (FD-2010-00302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ | ny x + * L X+ * X*+ X*+ ISSUES A94.06 INDEX NUMBER A67.50 A93.22 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_ | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3. The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: Exhibit #5: Applicant’s Contentions Exhibit #6: Department of Veterans...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00599

    Original file (FD-2013-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at AndrewsAFBon04 Apr2014.Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedat thehearing: Exhibit#5:CharacterreferenceletterTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00577

    Original file (FD-2008-00577.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETYER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE __ COUNSEL’§ RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 07 Dec 2009 FD-2008-00577 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL: RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR. A tender consideration is the process of reviewing a projected personal appearance case to determine if the board would...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00241_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00241_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge tohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB) butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoardgrantstherequestedrelief.