NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (IAST. FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AICSNfSSAN
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
-*-" " .LuL.-.>-"
HON
1
VOTE OF TIIE BOARD
" "(-,EN
- A
UOTHC
I OTHER
I
DENY
1
I
....................................
I INDEX NUMBER
IbblltS
A94.53
HEARING DATE
1 11 Jan 2007
A67.10
I
EXELLBITS SUBMITTED TO T H E BOARD
I
,
,
,
1
2
3
1 4
OlCl.>SED OF; 1Ht ATrACHtU AIR FORCE DISCfi\RGE REVIEH BUARD DECISIUNAL K41 IWALF
1 Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a pcrsonal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to subtnit an
application to the AFBCMR
1 Names and votes will be rnadc available to the applicant at thc applicant's rcqucst.
SAF/MRDR
550 L' STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
StLRETAHY OF THE AIR FORCE Pb,RSONNP I COUNC 11.
AIR FORCE DISLHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3HD FLOOR
A N P R ~ W S A ~ B . MU ZO~~Z-IIHIZ
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EP-V2)
Previous cdition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NlJMBER
FD-2(,(,6-U0
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable,
I The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains availablc pertinent data on the applicant and the factors lcading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of [he record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge,
ISSUE:
The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service
record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case
on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated the applicant received two J,etters of
Reprimand, a Record of Individual Counseling and five verbal counselings for misconduct. Applicant was
administratively disciplined for financial irresponsibility, disobeying a direct order, lying, and making a false
official statement. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample
opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Roard concluded the misconduct was a significant
departure from conduct expected of all military members. 'Ihe characterization of the discharge received by
the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Roard concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis lor
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH AMN)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recrd a GEN Disch fr USAF Bolling AFB, DC on 1 Jul
94 UP AFR 39-10, para 5-46 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 12 Jun 72. Enlmt Age: 20 11/12. Disch Age: 22 0/12, Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-86, E-50, G-86, M-50. PAFSC: 4A031 - Health Service Management
Apprentice. DAS: 30 Sep 93.
b. Prior Sv: None.
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as Arnn 8 Jun 93 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 00 Mo 24 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: None.
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: VBC, 03 JVN 94 - Financial irresponsibility.
VBC, 02 JUN 94 - Financial irresponsibility.
VBC, 23 MAY 94 - Financial irresponsibility.
VBC, 29 APR 94 - Financial irresponsibility.
VBC, 15 APR 94 - Financial irresponsibility.
RIC, 07 FEB 94 - Disobeying direct orders and lying.
LOR/UIF, 13 JAN 94 - Financial irresponsibility.
LOR, 18 OCT 93 - Making a false official statement.
f. CM: None.
I g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (00) Mos (24) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (00) Mos (24) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 10 May 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.
ATCH
None .
. .
-
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
, .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
' MEMORANDUM. FOR m' i
. ..
FROM: 1100 MEDTCAL,SQ/SG
. .
.
.
, .
, ..
.
.
.
i
,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A C i - - - C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '
m
. - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - I ' .
. . .
I
'
. ,, .
,
:
f:
. .
,
...
" *'f : i*
. .
.." ,. .
. .
. ; -1.5 .Jvp: Igg4
; . . .
.
.
. .
.
,,
7 7
d
i 1.
3
SUBJECT: ~otiiication Letter '
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United: States Air
Force for Unsatisfactory Performance and Minor Disciplinary
Infractions, The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, paragraphs
5 ~ 2 6 ( d ) and 5-46. If my recommendation is approved, your service
will be characterized as honorable or general. I am recommending
that your service be characterized as General.
2: My reasons for this ,action are:
a. On or about 18 Oct 93, you made a false official statement
to wit: you told the Personal Financial Manager that you were
pregnant in order to receive priority base housing. This resulted
in your receiving-a Letter of Reprimand..
b. On ox about 13 Jan 94, an investigation disclosed that you
were $678.32 past due on your car loan payments. This resulted in
your receiving an Letter of Reprimand.
c. During Dec 93, Jan 94, ---------------
and Feb 94, you did repeatedly
disobey direct orders from Sgt I -------------- i and TSgt : ........ i in several
incidents. On or about 7 Feb 94, you received a Letter of
Counseling for these incidents.
, - - - - - - - - -
d. On or about 15 Apr 94, you did draw a check for $164.50 to
the Finance Co. without having sufficient funds to cover this
check. You were verbally counseled for this.
,
e . On or about 29 A p r 94, you did draw a check. for 164.50 to
the Finance Co. without having sufficient funds to cover this
check,
f. In May 94, you did write a check to the Bolling AFB
Exchange in the amount of $13.85 without having sufficient funds to
cover this check. When your First Sergeant, MSgt ,. : .. .-.-. .. Y inquired
about repayment, you stated that you would take care of this matter
on your lunch break on 1 Jun 94.
inquired of you the status of the dishonored check and you bstalfe&
you had not yet paid the debt. Your reason for not complying was
that you tried to withdraw $200.00 and were denied because you did
not have .that amount available. You: were verbally counseled for
this offense.
On 2 Jun 94, MSgt :
..-....-....
.-----------
.Y .
I.,,
.
, 1 .
.
.
., .
r ' . .
.. .
..: I .
. . . 7 .
.
.
.
g. On or about 23 May 94, you did write a check for $125.39 to
, Forever Young without having sufficient funds to cover this check.
You were verbally counseled for this offense.
h. .On or about 24 May 94, you did write a check for $167.18 to
Forever Young without having sufficient funds to cover this check.
You were verbally counseled for this offense.
i. On or about 3 Jun 94, at approximately 1300 hrs, You
received a phone call. A few seconds later you turned to TSgt
----------
;--------:
and stated that l~Malcolm Grow Medical Center n e e d e d - - ~ ~ see
i then
you because they found something in your bloodn. TSgt :
picked up the phone to find out the urgency of theL-sZEuation
because manning was low, and if at all possible TSgt :-.-.-...3needdeda
you to remain at work and go to MGMC later. However, TSgt I--------:
discovered that you had lied to her and that you were in fact
, - - - - - - - - - - - - .
speaking w i t h : -------------
: of Forever Young regarding checks that you
had bounced. You were verbally counseled for this offense.
, - - - - - - - - -
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority
in support of this recommendation are attached. The commander
exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher authority will decide
whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if
you are discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you
are.discharged, you will be ineligible fox reenlistment in the Air
Force.
3. You have the right, to consult counsel. Military legal counsel,
has been
you to consult
have made an appointment for
Andrews AFB,
counsel at your
4,. You have the wight to submit statements in your own behalf.
want the separation authority to consider must
Any statements
/,& unless you request and receive extension
reach me by &I
for good cau& shown. I will send them to the separation
authority.
5 . If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your
behalf, your failure will constitute a waiver of your right to do
so.
6. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must
t to 1100th Medical Squadron, Bolling AFB, Washington DC, on
fie*., at ~ R b a hrs.
, 7 . Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by
the Privacy Act Statement as explained in AFR 39-10, attachment 2.
A copy of AFR 39-10 is available for your use in the 1100 Medical
Squadron Orderly Room.
,. -
I
.-------------
commander
-----------------------------------------------------------------.
Atch -
1. Receipt of ~otification Ltr
2. Separation Physical Ltr
3. ID Card Retrieval Ltr
4. Airman's Statement -
5. Supporting Documents
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00053
mere AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA | ee PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL NONE MEMBERS SITTING ea ISSUES INDEX NUMBER f iS ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.11, A94.05, A94.53 447.00 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE 03-05-28 CASE NUMBER FD2003-00053 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00216
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2003-00216 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was due to financial negligance (sic), on my behalf. For this offense you received an Article 15 dated 15 Jun 94, with a UIF entry.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00328
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's characterization of discharge inequitable. ISSUE: Applicant received a general discharge for misconduct - minor disciplinary infractions Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and the DRB concurred. Although the records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand, three k t t e r s of Counseling, four Records of Individual...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00093
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN —mas, | AMN __ |
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00044
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. g. Record of SV: 03...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0459
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN ae PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL a VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY 4 X 1 — ed xX xX X ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO: THE BOARD & . | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE a 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00101
(Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge is unsatisfying, and the nature of that title is due to my treatment while on active duty status. For this offense, you received an Article 15 dated 2 May 94, with punishment of 7 days extra duty and 7 days restriction to the limits of Sheppard AFB (Atch 1, Tab 1) b. of counseling (LOC) on 30 Aug 95 (Atch 6, Tab I).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00363
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of misconduct. You did, on or about 2 Jun 94, f'ail to obey a direct order to make a payment andlor obtain a receipt for payment on your Army, Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) Deferred Payment Plan @PP) account, and made false statements to your flight NCOIC concerning your...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00082
Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 21 Apr 81 - 9 Sep 81 (4 months 20 days) (Inactive). (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: Unsubstantiated allegations. addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00016
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I I MEMBER SITTING HON I WTE agars, eogga GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY ................................. ISSUES A94.53 1NIIF.X NllMBEH A67.10 I HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER X EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO '(m BOARD I 1 I ORDER APPOINTINGTHE BOARD 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 2 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 1 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAI, EX1...