Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00137
Original file (FD2006-00137.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICK  MEMBER (LASI',  FIHS'I' MI1)I)I.E  INI'I'IAI,) 

CKADE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAKD HEARING RECORD 

I  AFSNISSAN 

.......................... 
'I'YPE  GEN 

PERSONAL APPEAKANCE 

AMN 
I 

I 

X 

RECORD REVIEW 

I 

C Q U ~ ~ ~ ~ ,

, 

 

NAhlE OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 

ADDRESS AND OK OKGANI7ATION OF COUNSEL 

YES 

Nn 

X 

MEMBER SITTING 

-*-- 

HON 

I 

GEN 

I 

I 

- 
OTIIER 

1  -- 
I 

I)t.NY 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

.  u 
llOTHC 

I 

I 

1 

.................................... 

ISSUES 

A93.19 
A92.21 
A92.17 

INDEX  NUMBER 

A67.50 

HEARING  DATE 

I 

CASE NUMBER 

1 
2 
3 
4 

ORDER APPOINI'INCr  THE BOARD 

AI'I'LICATION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
1,l~l"l'F.R OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF 01' PERSONNEL FILE 
COIJNSEL'S  RELEASE '1'0 THE BOARD 
ADD[T[ONAI,  I'XI IIHITS SliBMITI'I~I) AT TIME OF 
PERSONAI.  AI'PEARANCE 

TAPI!  RF.C:ORIIING OF PERSONAI.  APPEARANCI< Ilk. 

11 Jan 2007 
APPLICAWT'S  ISSLE AhD THE BOARD a DEClblOYU Ka110\41  4 R F  DliClli9TD O h  M E  ATThCHtD AIU  FORCF DlZCljARQC  RCVIE\V BOARD UtClSlUN41  IATIOY4LE 

I 

I 

1  FD-2006-00137 

Case heard  in Washington, D.C, 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal  appearance with/without  counsel, and tlie right to si~brnit an 
application to the AFBCMR 

Names and votes will  be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. 

I 

550 C STRlX'r WbS'J'.  SUI'l'E 40 
RANIlOl.l'l1  AFB, TX 781 50-4742 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN  00 

--  - 

SECHKl'AkY OF TlIE AIR FORCE PKHSONNEL COUNCIL 
AIR FORCE DISCHAHCE REVIEW BOARD 
1535 COMMANI) DR. EE WING.3RO FLOOK 
ANDREWS AFR. MD 20761-7001 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL  RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2,)"6-00137 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable. 

Thc applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (URB) but declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached bricf contains available pertincnt data on the applicant and the factors leading to thc discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denicd.  I'hc Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that 
provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or itnpropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

ISSUE: 
Issue  1 .   Applicant admits [hat he made bad decisions during his off-duty time that were alcohol relatcd 
incidents.  The records indicatcd the applicant received two Article  15's, and a Vacation for misconduct. 
Both of the Article 15's received by applicant were for striking airmen with his fist.  'The first Article  15, he 
was punished with a suspended reductioii in grade to Airman and a reprimand.  'l'hc second Article  15, hc 
received a suspended reduction  in grade to Airman, forfeiture of $645.00 pay for two months, and 30 days of 
correctional custody.  He was disciplined with a Vacation action for driving under the influence of alcohol. 
He was reduced in grade to Airman.  The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the 
applicant had ample opportunities to change his negativc behavior.  The Board concluded the misconduct 
was a significant departure from conduct expected of all  military members.  The characterization of the 
discharge received by the applicant was found to bc appropriate. 

Issue 2.  Applicant  states that his discharge did not take into account the good things hc did while in the 
service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty pcrforrnance as documented by his performance reports, 
letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.  'I'hey  found the seriousness of the willful tnisconduct 
offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance.  The Board concluded the discharge was 
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. 

Issue 3.  The DRB was pleased to sce that the applicant was doing well and continuing his education. 
However, no inequity or itnpropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hcaring. 
The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service. 

Issue 4.  The applicant cited his desire to receive the G. 1.  Bill benefits as justification for upgrade.  The DRH 
noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on May 21, 
2001) that he understood he must receive an I lonorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. 
The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these bei~cfits was having on the applicant, but this is 
not a matter of inequity or impropriety wliich would warrant an upgrade. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The Discharge Review Board concludes that the dischargc was consistent with the 
procedural and substantive requirements of the dischargc regulation and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view of the forcgoing findings, thc Board  further concludes that there exists no lcgal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not bc changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Uricf 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 

(Former AMN)  (HGH AlC) 

1.  MATTER  UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Kirtland AFB, NM  on 19 
Sep 03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50 (Pattern of Misconduct).  Appeals for Honorable 
Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 9 Feb 81.  Enlmt Age: 20 2/12.  Disch Age: 22 7/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A,  A-56,  E-64,  G-59,  M-60. PAFSC: 2A532A -  Helicopter Maintenance 
Apprentice.  DAS: 21 Mar 02. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 21 Apr 01 -  07 May 01 (17 days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB  8 May 01 for 6 years. Svd: 02 Yrs 04 Mo 12 Das, all AMS. 

b ,   Grade Status:  A m  -  20 May 03  (Vacation, 28 Jul 03) 

A1C -  22 Jun 01 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art  15's:  (1) 28 Jul 03, Vacation, Kirtland AFB, NM  -  Article 111. 

You, did, on or about 13 Jul 03, in the parking lot of 
dormitory 20351 physically control a vehicle, to wit: a 
passenger car, while the alcohol concentration in your 
breath was 0.10 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of 
breath or greater as shown by chemical analysis. 
Reduction to Amn. 

(No appeal) (No mitigation) 

(2) 20 May 03, Kirtland AFB, NM  -  Article 128.  You, did, 

on or about 13 Apr 03, unlawfully strike A1C : -------------- I 
, - - - - - - - - - 
:--------! 
on his person with your fist.  Suspended reduction 
to A m .   Forfeiture of $645 pay per month for 2 months, 
30 days correctional custody.  (No appeal)  (No 
mitigation) 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

( 3 )  19 Nov 02, Kirtland AFB, NM  -  Article 128. .---- Y?-!--iii,  on 

or about 15 Sep 02, unlawfully strike AlC;-.-..-....-..-.- i 
'..-..-... 
I - - - - - - - - -  :on his person with your fist.  Suspended reduction 
to A m  and Reprimand.  (No appeal) (No mitigation) 

e.  Additional: None. 

f .   CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: 08 May 01 -  09 Jan 03  Kirtland AFB  4  (Initial) 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  NDSM, AFTR, AFOUA, SAEMR. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS:  (02) Yrs  (04) Mos  (29) Das 
TAMS:  (02) Yss  (04) Mos  (12) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED  FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 31 Mar  06. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable) 

ISSUES ATTACHED 

BREIF. 

ATCH 
1.  Applicant's Issues. 
2.  Seven character statements. 

APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 

FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES 

(Please read instructions on Pagw 3 end 4 -I? 

com$etihg  this apfication.) 

OMB No. 07040004 
OMB approvai expirss 
Aug 31,2006 

TIN  Public rbwrtho Krdbn hr thh mlbction at kfemutbn h srtmltd to rvawb 30 minws pr mapanar,  inclulho t h  tku far rwimlna imUuctlom, wrcMra Oxidra data aourE=. 
a.thsrim  d mintslnlm tho dnm nmdd. and cormlntiw ard reviewino the wllrction of infomration.  Ssrd canmsnta rmwrd'na this W m n  ostknob, or wv otha -act  of thm cotkction 
i t  Intomiatbn. i n c l u d l n g ~ ~ t i o m  
rw reduclno the bvdin, to tho ~ o p h n t  of D o f o ~ ,  Exrutivo Soryicos Mroctorptoio704km4~. Raspondents should k awuo tht wtwtthrPlnllnp 
m y  othr  rwisin of  law,  no person shall k subbct to ow  pwlw tor  fhilinp to cowly with a  collectbn of  infomtbn B it d o ~ s  nat displsy  a curently valid O M  control nurnbsr. 
PLEASE LO NaT RETURN YOUR  FORM TO  THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.  RETURN COMRETED FORM TO  THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON BACK  OF MIS 
PAGE. 

PRIVACY ACT STATEMEM 

AUTHORITY:  10 U.S.C.  1653;  E.O.  9397. 
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S):  To apply for a change in the characterization or reason for military discharge issued to an individual. 
ROUTINE USEIS):  None. 
DISCLOSURE:  Voluntary;  however, failure t o  
Social Security Number is strictly to assure proper identification of the individual and appropriate recwdp. 
I .  APPLICANT DATA  rrhe prson whose discharge is  to be reviewed).  PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION. 
1 
I X 1 AIR  FORCE 
a,  BRANCH OF SERVICE  IX MU) 
?.-  -EMEL&.-&&  Middle ln~tiall 

I MARINE  CORPS 

c.  GRADWRANK AT DISCHARGE 

I ARW  I 

I NAW 

identifying information rnayfmpede processing of this  application.  The requet for 

I COAST GUARD 

d.  SOCLAL SECURW NUMBER 

, - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

. - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - -1 

2.  DATE OF DISCHARGE OR  SEPARATION 

IYWYMMDD) (If date is mom than  75 years 

subrnfia DD F ~ r t n  1491 
20030919 

3.  UNIT AND LOCATION AT DISCHARGE 

X 

I 

4.  DISCHARGE CHARACTERIZATION RECEIVED IX me) 

' 

E 2  

HONORABLE 
GENERAUUNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS 
UNDER OTHW THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS 
BAD CONDUCT /Specid courimart~al only) 
UHCHAMCY EREEL) 
OTHER (Ex~lein) 

6.  BOARD ACTION REQUESTED IX  one. 
X 
-- 

CHANGE TO  HONORABLE 
CHANGE TO G WERAUUNDER 
HONORABLE CONDrrlONS 
CHANGE TO UNCHARACTERIZU) 
/Not npphcabie for Atr  Force) 
CHANGE NARRATIVE REASON FOR 
SEPARATION TO: 
 I 

,

OR  SEPARATION 
58 ACFT MAXNT 
Kirtlnnd  A F R  NM R7117 
8,  ISSUES:  WHY AN UPGRADE OR  CHANGE IS REQUESTED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST /Continue in item  74.  Seu instructions an 
I r d v e d  a General Discharge due to bad decisions madc off duty. While my performance was exemplary on duty I conducted 
myself in anunprofessional marmer several times which ultimately resulted in the desbwtion of my career. I held my responsibility 
to the United States Air Force in the highest regard, it pains me to think of the way I let alcohol get in the way of it. 
I tried time after time to through treatment, and counseling to kick the habit, but only after I had lost what was most important 

d  I 

h  3. 

1

17.  tXifap@hWeI AN APPLICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON IWYYMMDDI 

AND THIS FORM IS SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES,  JUSTIRCATIOIY.  OR EVIDENCE. 

C85B &as@ sand copPes.l 

ff mifitary documcnia m med~i:al p~rud* 2-  ~ - 4 y o w  

8.  IN SUFPORT OF THIS APPLICA'I ION.  THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMlTfED AS NIDENCE:  ICnnttnus m Item  17. 
I. m t e r  Statmud - SSgt: 
:  5. character Statement - s~gti 
:  6. Character Statement - Msgti 
2 Character Statement - SSgt : 
3. Character Statement - SrA 4 
i 
4- Character Statement - SrA 3.. -. . -. . -. . -. . -. .: 
9.  TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED IX one/ 
x :CONDUCT A  RECORD REVlmY OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILrlARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDKWMAL DOCUMEKTATIOM 
SUBMWED BY ME.  I ANDIOR /wunsel/rep~~~wtative~ WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD. 
I ANDIOR tcwnse//repres~iativeI WISH TO APPEAR A T  A  HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO  THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BaARD IN M E  
WASHINGTON.  D.C.  AllETROPoLlrAN AREA. 
I  AND/OR /cwnsel/re~resenlativeI WISH TO APPEAR AT A  HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO  THE GOVERNMEKT BEFORE A  TRAVELING PANEL CLOSEST TO 
I lsnter city and sfatel- 
/NOTE:  The Navy Dmcharge Revfew Board d o e  not have a traveling panel.) 

------------------ 
7. Character Statement - Tsgt : ------------------ 

10.a.  COUNSEUREPRESENTATIVE /if any) NAME /Last, First, Middle In1iia0 AND AIJX?ESS 

I b.  TELEPHONE NUMBER (fnctude Area Code} 

/See item  70 of  the instructions about counseWrcpresurtative.) 

c.  E-MAIL 

I 

11.  APPLICANT MUST SIGN IN ITEM 13.a.  BELOW.  If the record in question is that of a deceased or incompetent person,  LEGAL PROOF OF 

DEATH OR  INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION.  If the application is signed by other than the applicant, indicate 
the name lprtntl 
SPOUSE 

and relationship by marking a box below. 
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE 

NEXT OF KIN 

WIDOWER 

WIDOW 

d.  FAX NUMBER  llnclude Area Code) 
I 

12.a. CURRENT MAII-INQ ADDRESS OF APPLICANT OR  PERSON ABOVE 
. -. . -. FP~I~I~~OP~I~,CB~~PO 
change in address I 

~ f q y

 

b.  TELEPHONE N U M F  U a c k d s - O y   Codel 
c.  E-MAIL : 

--------------------- 

: - - - - - - - - -1 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ I  

d.  FAX NUMBER  /Include Area Code) 

13.  CERTIFICATION. 

I make the foregoing statements, as part of my dairn,  with full knowledge of the 
penalties involved for willfully  making a false statement or claim. 1U.S. Code,  rifle 18, Sections 287 
end  1001, provide that an individual shall be  fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, 
or  both.) 

SH;NATUA.EE: P E ~ I A P P ! ~ E B M D C  

& ? ~ s ~ . n ~ ~ c - ~ ~ e r n ~  

abpvd- - - - - - - - -  b.  DATE SIGNED  - REQUIRED 
!  (YYVYMMDD) 
'  %D6i?S3/ 

k - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :  

CASE NUMBER 

(Do not  write in this space.1 

0 9@6000/3 

3 

DD FORM 293, MAR 2004 

PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE  OBSOLETE. 

Page 1 of 4 Pages 

9 

I 

I 
I 

14. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 6, ISSUES (If applc8bl4 
to me was I able to pick up the pieces and try to salvage a meaningful existence. Since my separation I have quit 
alcohol, 
Learned a trade, and been trying to put myself through school. I am training to work on helicopters again in or&r  to use the valuable 
knowledge I obtained fkom tbe Air Force. However due to financial constraints I am unsure of my ability to continue my education 
I seek to upgrade my discharge in order to regain eligibility for my MGIB -ts, 
actions during my enlistment. 
As my athhents show I tried to the best of my ability to shine m e v q  way, I have m excuse for my actions when under the 
influence of dwhol, only deep regret. If  my upgrade is approved I will undoubtedly be able to achieve my goals of obtaining a 
degree, md becoming a more productive member of society. 

8s well as to put behind me the shame of my 

16. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 8, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (tf sppficable) 

MAIL COMPLETED APPLICA'I-IONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS  BELOW. 

ARMY 

Army Review Boards Agency 
Support Divisim. St. Louis 
9700 Page Avenue 
St.  Louis, MO  63132-5200 
(See http:llarba.army.pentagon.rnil) 

1

-

 

NAVY AND  MARINE CORPS 

Naval Council of Personnel Boards 
720 Kennon Sweet,  S.E. 
Room 309 (NDRB) 
Washington Navy Yard, DC  20374-5023 

AIR  FORCE 

COASTGUARD 

Air Force Review  Boards Agency 
SAFIMRBR 
5 5 0 4  Street West,  Suite 40 
Randolph AFB,  TX  78150-4742 

I 
OD FORM 293,  MAR 2004 

I 

U.S. Coast Guard 
Commandant (G-WPM) 
2 100 Sewnd Street,  S.W.  Room 5500 
Washington,  DC  20593 

I 
Page 2 of 4 Pages 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 
58TH AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQUADRON (AETC) 

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE NEW MEXICO 

MEMORANDUM FOR AMN L -. . -. -. . -. -. . -. -. . -. -, . -. -. . -. -. . -. -. -5 

' 58 AMXS 

....................................... 

FROM: 58 AMXSICC 

SUBJECT:  Notification Memorandum 

1. I am recommending your dscharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, 
specifically a pattern of misconduct.  The authority for this action is A.FPD  36-32, Military 
Retirements and Separations (14 Jul93) and Am 36-3208, Administrative Separation of  Airmen, 
paragraph 5.50 (28 May 03).  If my recommendation is approved, your service will be 
characterized as Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions). I am recommendng that 
your service be characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions) . 

2.  My reasons for this action are: 

a.  On 15 Sep 02, you unlawfully struck another airman with your fist, breaking his jaw. 
Inappropriate remarks were made between you and the other airman, but you were the one who 
threw the first punch.  In fact, there is no ,qyide~e-h&!hhe other airman even attempted to hit you 
at all.  In your written statement to MSgt  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
ion 8 Oct 02, you stated that you "have no 
excuse for my actions, as I know they where [were] wrong, and shame what the Air Force stands 
for.  I have learned a valuable lesson, and should another confrontation arise, I will embrace the 
Core Value, Integrity, and do what is right even if no one is looking."  On 19 Nov 02, I imposed 
punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, of a suspended reduction to the grade of  aiman and a 
reprimand.  On 19 Nov 02, an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) was established based upon 
this incident.  (Atch A) 

b.  Despite your statement that you "have learned a valuable lesson.. .and do what is right even if 
no one is looking," on 13 Apr 03, you were involved in another physical altercation with another 
airman.  Alcohol was involved in the incident.  You and the other airman got into a verbal 
altercation and punches were thrown.  After knocking the other airman down, you followed a 
wise suggestion by another and went to your dormitory room.  However, the wise decision by 
you to go to your dormitory room did not last long, as you returned a few minutes later and once 
again confronted the other airman.  This time you threw the first punch and according to your 
statement to Security Forces on 13 Apr 03, you  struck him "as  many times as necessary" until he 
"was demobilized and no longer a threat."  On 20 May 03, I imposed punishment under Article 
15, UCMJ, of a suspended reduction to the grade of  airman, forfeiture of  $645 pay per month for 
two months and thirty days correctional custody.  On 20 May 03, this Article 15, UCMJ action 
was added to your U P .  In your statement to me dated 14 May 03, which was prior to my 
imposition of punishment under Article 15, UCNIJ, you stated "I deeply regret my previous 
actions and they way I have disregarded the UCNIJ, and shamed the United States Air Force. 
This is the second time and last time I will do so.  I have learned from my mistakes, and I will do 
everything in my power to reverse the trend of  insubordination."  (Atch B) 

FbR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 
58TFI AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQUADRON (AETC) 

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE NEW MEXICO 

c.  Despite your statement to me that you "have learned from my mistakes,'' on 13 Jul03, you 
were arrested for driving under the intoxication of alcohol.  While on a walking patrol at 0508, a 
security forces member stopped you while you were backing a vehicle out of a parking space 
near the dormitory rooms.  The officer detected a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage emitting 
from your breath, as well as bloodshot and glassy eyes.  At first you refused to provide a sample 
of your breath, but after you were advised of the New Mexico Implied Consent Policy, you 
provided a sample and had a .18 blood alcohol content.  You were legally drunk under Article 
11 1, UCMJ (Drunken or Reckless Operation of  a Vehicle) and New Mexico State Law,  On 28 
Jul03, the suspended reduction in rank to airman I had given you via an Article 15, UCMJ, on 20 
May 03 was vacated,  (Atch C) 

3.  Copies of  the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of  this 
recommendation are attached.  The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are 
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If  you are discharged, you will be ineligible 
for reenlistment in the Air F o r c w d  any special pay, bonuses, or education assistance funds 
may be subject to recoupment. 

4.  You have the right to consult counsel.  Military legal counsel will be obtained to assist you. 
The legal office will make an appointment for you to consult with an area defense counsel,  You 
may consult civilian co,unsel at your own expense. 

5.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 workdays from today unless you request 
and receive an extension for good cause shown.  I will send any timely written statements you 
give to me to the separation authority. 

6.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

7.  The LRgal Office will obtain a mandatory medical examination for you at the 377th Medical 
Group (Family Practice). 

8.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of  1974.  A 
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your unit orderly room or at the Area Defense 
Counsel's  office, located at Building 20361,8201 K Street, Kjrtland AFB, NM 871 17. 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 
58TR AIRCRAFT hlAINTENANCE SQUADRON (AETC) 

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE NEW MEXICO 

Commander 0 

Attachments: 
A.  Article 15, dated 19 Nov 02 (including the statements pertaining to the incident) 
B.  Amcle 15, dated 20 May 03 (including the statements pertaining to the incident) 
C.  Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment, dated 28 Jul03 (including information 
pertaining to the incident) 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00143

    Original file (FD2004-00143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3KD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ 6 2 0 7 6 2 - 7 0 0 2 Previous edition will be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER F~-2004-00143 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge member waived his right to consult with counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf. (Atch B) c. On 20 May 03, you received punishment under Article 15 for striking another airman in the face with your fist and underage dmking.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00255

    Original file (FD2006-00255.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You, who knew or should have known of your duties, on or about 20 Jul 03, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 years, as it was your duty to do. For this failure to inform your superiors of the damage, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 27 Aug 02 (Attachment 9). For this dereliction of duty, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0310

    Original file (FD2002-0310.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0310 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD _— a. Basis for Discharge: Respondent has received three Article 15s, all of them alcohol-related. Discharge is appropriate.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00037

    Original file (FD2007-00037.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME O F SERVICE MEMRKH (LAST, FIRST hI1L)L)I.E IN1 I'IAI,) .................... MU 20761.7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD UEClSIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2007-00037 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00009

    Original file (FD2003-00009.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change his reenlistment code. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00188

    Original file (FD2006-00188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 207b2-711112 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will bc used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIIMBER FD-2006-001gg GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. MY name is i - - - - y - - - - - - - - i and I am submitting this letter to you along with my The enfgti-nadeg began when three other members,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00364

    Original file (FD2006-00364.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIIIULE INITIAL,) GRADE A FSNISSA N AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I TYPE GEN I I ] NAME OF COlINSEI AND OR OR(;ANIZA'I ION PERSONAL APPEARANCE I C o W ~ ~ ~ ~ I I MEMBER SITTING 1 ISSUES A92.21 INDEX NIIMOER A67.50 IIE4RINC DATE CASE NUMBEH I AMN 1 X I I I I RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR OR(;I\NILA~ION OF COIJNSEL I YQT6 OF THE BOARD I 1 I X .- X t EXHIHrTS SUBMlTTED TO 'THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00374

    Original file (FD2006-00374.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 (TYPE CEN I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I PERSONAL APPEARANCE GRADE 1 AIC 1 x I RECORDREV~EW MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 'The miscoilduct included failure to go, wearing civilian clothes during duty hours, failure to follow a direct order, dereliction of duty, conduct unbecoming, malingering, failure to complete assigned tasks, insubordinate conduct towards a noncommissioned officer. Because of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00031

    Original file (FD2007-00031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SRA) 1. For this misconduct, you received an RIC, dated 21 Mar 03, (Atch 10) (I) You, did, on or about 23 Sep 02, without authority, absent yourself fiom your place of duty at which you were required to be, to wit: 49th Civil Engineering Squadron, located at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, and did remain so absent until on or about 23 Sep 02. You are ordered to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00383

    Original file (FD2005-00383.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NLIMBhR FD-2005-00383 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a vacation, two Letters of Reprimand (LOR'S), Unfavorable Information File, two Records of Individual Coullseling (RIC's), dishonored check notification and an arrest for misconduct. Your actions are a violation of Article 92, for which you received a Letter of Reprimand...