NAME OF SERVICK MEMBER (LASI', FIHS'I' MI1)I)I.E INI'I'IAI,)
CKADE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAKD HEARING RECORD
I AFSNISSAN
..........................
'I'YPE GEN
PERSONAL APPEAKANCE
AMN
I
I
X
RECORD REVIEW
I
C Q U ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
,
NAhlE OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS AND OK OKGANI7ATION OF COUNSEL
YES
Nn
X
MEMBER SITTING
-*--
HON
I
GEN
I
I
-
OTIIER
1 --
I
I)t.NY
VOTE OF THE BOARD
. u
llOTHC
I
I
1
....................................
ISSUES
A93.19
A92.21
A92.17
INDEX NUMBER
A67.50
HEARING DATE
I
CASE NUMBER
1
2
3
4
ORDER APPOINI'INCr THE BOARD
AI'I'LICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
1,l~l"l'F.R OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF 01' PERSONNEL FILE
COIJNSEL'S RELEASE '1'0 THE BOARD
ADD[T[ONAI, I'XI IIHITS SliBMITI'I~I) AT TIME OF
PERSONAI. AI'PEARANCE
TAPI! RF.C:ORIIING OF PERSONAI. APPEARANCI< Ilk.
11 Jan 2007
APPLICAWT'S ISSLE AhD THE BOARD a DEClblOYU Ka110\41 4 R F DliClli9TD O h M E ATThCHtD AIU FORCF DlZCljARQC RCVIE\V BOARD UtClSlUN41 IATIOY4LE
I
I
1 FD-2006-00137
Case heard in Washington, D.C,
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and tlie right to si~brnit an
application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
I
550 C STRlX'r WbS'J'. SUI'l'E 40
RANIlOl.l'l1 AFB, TX 781 50-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
-- -
SECHKl'AkY OF TlIE AIR FORCE PKHSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHAHCE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMANI) DR. EE WING.3RO FLOOK
ANDREWS AFR. MD 20761-7001
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2,)"6-00137
GENERAL: The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable.
Thc applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (URB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached bricf contains available pertincnt data on the applicant and the factors leading to thc discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denicd. I'hc Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that
provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or itnpropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Issue 1 . Applicant admits [hat he made bad decisions during his off-duty time that were alcohol relatcd
incidents. The records indicatcd the applicant received two Article 15's, and a Vacation for misconduct.
Both of the Article 15's received by applicant were for striking airmen with his fist. 'The first Article 15, he
was punished with a suspended reductioii in grade to Airman and a reprimand. 'l'hc second Article 15, hc
received a suspended reduction in grade to Airman, forfeiture of $645.00 pay for two months, and 30 days of
correctional custody. He was disciplined with a Vacation action for driving under the influence of alcohol.
He was reduced in grade to Airman. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the
applicant had ample opportunities to change his negativc behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct
was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the
discharge received by the applicant was found to bc appropriate.
Issue 2. Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things hc did while in the
service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty pcrforrnance as documented by his performance reports,
letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. 'I'hey found the seriousness of the willful tnisconduct
offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.
Issue 3. The DRB was pleased to sce that the applicant was doing well and continuing his education.
However, no inequity or itnpropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hcaring.
The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.
Issue 4. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G. 1. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRH
noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on May 21,
2001) that he understood he must receive an I lonorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements.
The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these bei~cfits was having on the applicant, but this is
not a matter of inequity or impropriety wliich would warrant an upgrade.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the dischargc was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the dischargc regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the forcgoing findings, thc Board further concludes that there exists no lcgal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not bc changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Uricf
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Kirtland AFB, NM on 19
Sep 03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50 (Pattern of Misconduct). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 9 Feb 81. Enlmt Age: 20 2/12. Disch Age: 22 7/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A, A-56, E-64, G-59, M-60. PAFSC: 2A532A - Helicopter Maintenance
Apprentice. DAS: 21 Mar 02.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 21 Apr 01 - 07 May 01 (17 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 8 May 01 for 6 years. Svd: 02 Yrs 04 Mo 12 Das, all AMS.
b , Grade Status: A m - 20 May 03 (Vacation, 28 Jul 03)
A1C - 22 Jun 01
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 28 Jul 03, Vacation, Kirtland AFB, NM - Article 111.
You, did, on or about 13 Jul 03, in the parking lot of
dormitory 20351 physically control a vehicle, to wit: a
passenger car, while the alcohol concentration in your
breath was 0.10 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of
breath or greater as shown by chemical analysis.
Reduction to Amn.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
(2) 20 May 03, Kirtland AFB, NM - Article 128. You, did,
on or about 13 Apr 03, unlawfully strike A1C : -------------- I
, - - - - - - - - -
:--------!
on his person with your fist. Suspended reduction
to A m . Forfeiture of $645 pay per month for 2 months,
30 days correctional custody. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
( 3 ) 19 Nov 02, Kirtland AFB, NM - Article 128. .---- Y?-!--iii, on
or about 15 Sep 02, unlawfully strike AlC;-.-..-....-..-.- i
'..-..-...
I - - - - - - - - - :on his person with your fist. Suspended reduction
to A m and Reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
f . CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 08 May 01 - 09 Jan 03 Kirtland AFB 4 (Initial)
h. Awards & Decs: NDSM, AFTR, AFOUA, SAEMR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (02) Yrs (04) Mos (29) Das
TAMS: (02) Yss (04) Mos (12) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 31 Mar 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED
BREIF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Seven character statements.
APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
(Please read instructions on Pagw 3 end 4 -I?
com$etihg this apfication.)
OMB No. 07040004
OMB approvai expirss
Aug 31,2006
TIN Public rbwrtho Krdbn hr thh mlbction at kfemutbn h srtmltd to rvawb 30 minws pr mapanar, inclulho t h tku far rwimlna imUuctlom, wrcMra Oxidra data aourE=.
a.thsrim d mintslnlm tho dnm nmdd. and cormlntiw ard reviewino the wllrction of infomration. Ssrd canmsnta rmwrd'na this W m n ostknob, or wv otha -act of thm cotkction
i t Intomiatbn. i n c l u d l n g ~ ~ t i o m
rw reduclno the bvdin, to tho ~ o p h n t of D o f o ~ , Exrutivo Soryicos Mroctorptoio704km4~. Raspondents should k awuo tht wtwtthrPlnllnp
m y othr rwisin of law, no person shall k subbct to ow pwlw tor fhilinp to cowly with a collectbn of infomtbn B it d o ~ s nat displsy a curently valid O M control nurnbsr.
PLEASE LO NaT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION. RETURN COMRETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON BACK OF MIS
PAGE.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMEM
AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1653; E.O. 9397.
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): To apply for a change in the characterization or reason for military discharge issued to an individual.
ROUTINE USEIS): None.
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure t o
Social Security Number is strictly to assure proper identification of the individual and appropriate recwdp.
I . APPLICANT DATA rrhe prson whose discharge is to be reviewed). PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.
1
I X 1 AIR FORCE
a, BRANCH OF SERVICE IX MU)
?.- -EMEL&.-&& Middle ln~tiall
I MARINE CORPS
c. GRADWRANK AT DISCHARGE
I ARW I
I NAW
identifying information rnayfmpede processing of this application. The requet for
I COAST GUARD
d. SOCLAL SECURW NUMBER
, - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - -1
2. DATE OF DISCHARGE OR SEPARATION
IYWYMMDD) (If date is mom than 75 years
subrnfia DD F ~ r t n 1491
20030919
3. UNIT AND LOCATION AT DISCHARGE
X
I
4. DISCHARGE CHARACTERIZATION RECEIVED IX me)
'
E 2
HONORABLE
GENERAUUNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS
UNDER OTHW THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
BAD CONDUCT /Specid courimart~al only)
UHCHAMCY EREEL)
OTHER (Ex~lein)
6. BOARD ACTION REQUESTED IX one.
X
--
CHANGE TO HONORABLE
CHANGE TO G WERAUUNDER
HONORABLE CONDrrlONS
CHANGE TO UNCHARACTERIZU)
/Not npphcabie for Atr Force)
CHANGE NARRATIVE REASON FOR
SEPARATION TO:
I
,
OR SEPARATION
58 ACFT MAXNT
Kirtlnnd A F R NM R7117
8, ISSUES: WHY AN UPGRADE OR CHANGE IS REQUESTED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST /Continue in item 74. Seu instructions an
I r d v e d a General Discharge due to bad decisions madc off duty. While my performance was exemplary on duty I conducted
myself in anunprofessional marmer several times which ultimately resulted in the desbwtion of my career. I held my responsibility
to the United States Air Force in the highest regard, it pains me to think of the way I let alcohol get in the way of it.
I tried time after time to through treatment, and counseling to kick the habit, but only after I had lost what was most important
d I
h 3.
1
17. tXifap@hWeI AN APPLICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON IWYYMMDDI
AND THIS FORM IS SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES, JUSTIRCATIOIY. OR EVIDENCE.
C85B &as@ sand copPes.l
ff mifitary documcnia m med~i:al p~rud* 2- ~ - 4 y o w
8. IN SUFPORT OF THIS APPLICA'I ION. THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMlTfED AS NIDENCE: ICnnttnus m Item 17.
I. m t e r Statmud - SSgt:
: 5. character Statement - s~gti
: 6. Character Statement - Msgti
2 Character Statement - SSgt :
3. Character Statement - SrA 4
i
4- Character Statement - SrA 3.. -. . -. . -. . -. . -. .:
9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED IX one/
x :CONDUCT A RECORD REVlmY OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILrlARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDKWMAL DOCUMEKTATIOM
SUBMWED BY ME. I ANDIOR /wunsel/rep~~~wtative~ WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD.
I ANDIOR tcwnse//repres~iativeI WISH TO APPEAR A T A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BaARD IN M E
WASHINGTON. D.C. AllETROPoLlrAN AREA.
I AND/OR /cwnsel/re~resenlativeI WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMEKT BEFORE A TRAVELING PANEL CLOSEST TO
I lsnter city and sfatel-
/NOTE: The Navy Dmcharge Revfew Board d o e not have a traveling panel.)
------------------
7. Character Statement - Tsgt : ------------------
10.a. COUNSEUREPRESENTATIVE /if any) NAME /Last, First, Middle In1iia0 AND AIJX?ESS
I b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (fnctude Area Code}
/See item 70 of the instructions about counseWrcpresurtative.)
c. E-MAIL
I
11. APPLICANT MUST SIGN IN ITEM 13.a. BELOW. If the record in question is that of a deceased or incompetent person, LEGAL PROOF OF
DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. If the application is signed by other than the applicant, indicate
the name lprtntl
SPOUSE
and relationship by marking a box below.
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
NEXT OF KIN
WIDOWER
WIDOW
d. FAX NUMBER llnclude Area Code)
I
12.a. CURRENT MAII-INQ ADDRESS OF APPLICANT OR PERSON ABOVE
. -. . -. FP~I~I~~OP~I~,CB~~PO
change in address I
~ f q y
b. TELEPHONE N U M F U a c k d s - O y Codel
c. E-MAIL :
---------------------
: - - - - - - - - -1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ I
d. FAX NUMBER /Include Area Code)
13. CERTIFICATION.
I make the foregoing statements, as part of my dairn, with full knowledge of the
penalties involved for willfully making a false statement or claim. 1U.S. Code, rifle 18, Sections 287
end 1001, provide that an individual shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years,
or both.)
SH;NATUA.EE: P E ~ I A P P ! ~ E B M D C
& ? ~ s ~ . n ~ ~ c - ~ ~ e r n ~
abpvd- - - - - - - - - b. DATE SIGNED - REQUIRED
! (YYVYMMDD)
' %D6i?S3/
k - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :
CASE NUMBER
(Do not write in this space.1
0 9@6000/3
3
DD FORM 293, MAR 2004
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
Page 1 of 4 Pages
9
I
I
I
14. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 6, ISSUES (If applc8bl4
to me was I able to pick up the pieces and try to salvage a meaningful existence. Since my separation I have quit
alcohol,
Learned a trade, and been trying to put myself through school. I am training to work on helicopters again in or&r to use the valuable
knowledge I obtained fkom tbe Air Force. However due to financial constraints I am unsure of my ability to continue my education
I seek to upgrade my discharge in order to regain eligibility for my MGIB -ts,
actions during my enlistment.
As my athhents show I tried to the best of my ability to shine m e v q way, I have m excuse for my actions when under the
influence of dwhol, only deep regret. If my upgrade is approved I will undoubtedly be able to achieve my goals of obtaining a
degree, md becoming a more productive member of society.
8s well as to put behind me the shame of my
16. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 8, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (tf sppficable)
MAIL COMPLETED APPLICA'I-IONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.
ARMY
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Divisim. St. Louis
9700 Page Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63132-5200
(See http:llarba.army.pentagon.rnil)
1
-
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
720 Kennon Sweet, S.E.
Room 309 (NDRB)
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023
AIR FORCE
COASTGUARD
Air Force Review Boards Agency
SAFIMRBR
5 5 0 4 Street West, Suite 40
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4742
I
OD FORM 293, MAR 2004
I
U.S. Coast Guard
Commandant (G-WPM)
2 100 Sewnd Street, S.W. Room 5500
Washington, DC 20593
I
Page 2 of 4 Pages
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
58TH AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQUADRON (AETC)
KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE NEW MEXICO
MEMORANDUM FOR AMN L -. . -. -. . -. -. . -. -. . -. -, . -. -. . -. -. . -. -. -5
' 58 AMXS
.......................................
FROM: 58 AMXSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your dscharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct,
specifically a pattern of misconduct. The authority for this action is A.FPD 36-32, Military
Retirements and Separations (14 Jul93) and Am 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen,
paragraph 5.50 (28 May 03). If my recommendation is approved, your service will be
characterized as Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions). I am recommendng that
your service be characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions) .
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On 15 Sep 02, you unlawfully struck another airman with your fist, breaking his jaw.
Inappropriate remarks were made between you and the other airman, but you were the one who
threw the first punch. In fact, there is no ,qyide~e-h&!hhe other airman even attempted to hit you
at all. In your written statement to MSgt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ion 8 Oct 02, you stated that you "have no
excuse for my actions, as I know they where [were] wrong, and shame what the Air Force stands
for. I have learned a valuable lesson, and should another confrontation arise, I will embrace the
Core Value, Integrity, and do what is right even if no one is looking." On 19 Nov 02, I imposed
punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, of a suspended reduction to the grade of aiman and a
reprimand. On 19 Nov 02, an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) was established based upon
this incident. (Atch A)
b. Despite your statement that you "have learned a valuable lesson.. .and do what is right even if
no one is looking," on 13 Apr 03, you were involved in another physical altercation with another
airman. Alcohol was involved in the incident. You and the other airman got into a verbal
altercation and punches were thrown. After knocking the other airman down, you followed a
wise suggestion by another and went to your dormitory room. However, the wise decision by
you to go to your dormitory room did not last long, as you returned a few minutes later and once
again confronted the other airman. This time you threw the first punch and according to your
statement to Security Forces on 13 Apr 03, you struck him "as many times as necessary" until he
"was demobilized and no longer a threat." On 20 May 03, I imposed punishment under Article
15, UCMJ, of a suspended reduction to the grade of airman, forfeiture of $645 pay per month for
two months and thirty days correctional custody. On 20 May 03, this Article 15, UCMJ action
was added to your U P . In your statement to me dated 14 May 03, which was prior to my
imposition of punishment under Article 15, UCNIJ, you stated "I deeply regret my previous
actions and they way I have disregarded the UCNIJ, and shamed the United States Air Force.
This is the second time and last time I will do so. I have learned from my mistakes, and I will do
everything in my power to reverse the trend of insubordination." (Atch B)
FbR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
58TFI AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQUADRON (AETC)
KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE NEW MEXICO
c. Despite your statement to me that you "have learned from my mistakes,'' on 13 Jul03, you
were arrested for driving under the intoxication of alcohol. While on a walking patrol at 0508, a
security forces member stopped you while you were backing a vehicle out of a parking space
near the dormitory rooms. The officer detected a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage emitting
from your breath, as well as bloodshot and glassy eyes. At first you refused to provide a sample
of your breath, but after you were advised of the New Mexico Implied Consent Policy, you
provided a sample and had a .18 blood alcohol content. You were legally drunk under Article
11 1, UCMJ (Drunken or Reckless Operation of a Vehicle) and New Mexico State Law, On 28
Jul03, the suspended reduction in rank to airman I had given you via an Article 15, UCMJ, on 20
May 03 was vacated, (Atch C)
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reenlistment in the Air F o r c w d any special pay, bonuses, or education assistance funds
may be subject to recoupment.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel will be obtained to assist you.
The legal office will make an appointment for you to consult with an area defense counsel, You
may consult civilian co,unsel at your own expense.
5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 workdays from today unless you request
and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send any timely written statements you
give to me to the separation authority.
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. The LRgal Office will obtain a mandatory medical examination for you at the 377th Medical
Group (Family Practice).
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your unit orderly room or at the Area Defense
Counsel's office, located at Building 20361,8201 K Street, Kjrtland AFB, NM 871 17.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
58TR AIRCRAFT hlAINTENANCE SQUADRON (AETC)
KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE NEW MEXICO
Commander 0
Attachments:
A. Article 15, dated 19 Nov 02 (including the statements pertaining to the incident)
B. Amcle 15, dated 20 May 03 (including the statements pertaining to the incident)
C. Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment, dated 28 Jul03 (including information
pertaining to the incident)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00143
3KD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ 6 2 0 7 6 2 - 7 0 0 2 Previous edition will be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER F~-2004-00143 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge member waived his right to consult with counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf. (Atch B) c. On 20 May 03, you received punishment under Article 15 for striking another airman in the face with your fist and underage dmking.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00255
You, who knew or should have known of your duties, on or about 20 Jul 03, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 years, as it was your duty to do. For this failure to inform your superiors of the damage, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 27 Aug 02 (Attachment 9). For this dereliction of duty, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0310
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0310 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD _— a. Basis for Discharge: Respondent has received three Article 15s, all of them alcohol-related. Discharge is appropriate.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00037
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME O F SERVICE MEMRKH (LAST, FIRST hI1L)L)I.E IN1 I'IAI,) .................... MU 20761.7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD UEClSIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2007-00037 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00009
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change his reenlistment code. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00188
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 207b2-711112 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will bc used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIIMBER FD-2006-001gg GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. MY name is i - - - - y - - - - - - - - i and I am submitting this letter to you along with my The enfgti-nadeg began when three other members,...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00364
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIIIULE INITIAL,) GRADE A FSNISSA N AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I TYPE GEN I I ] NAME OF COlINSEI AND OR OR(;ANIZA'I ION PERSONAL APPEARANCE I C o W ~ ~ ~ ~ I I MEMBER SITTING 1 ISSUES A92.21 INDEX NIIMOER A67.50 IIE4RINC DATE CASE NUMBEH I AMN 1 X I I I I RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR OR(;I\NILA~ION OF COIJNSEL I YQT6 OF THE BOARD I 1 I X .- X t EXHIHrTS SUBMlTTED TO 'THE...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00374
1 (TYPE CEN I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I PERSONAL APPEARANCE GRADE 1 AIC 1 x I RECORDREV~EW MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 'The miscoilduct included failure to go, wearing civilian clothes during duty hours, failure to follow a direct order, dereliction of duty, conduct unbecoming, malingering, failure to complete assigned tasks, insubordinate conduct towards a noncommissioned officer. Because of...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00031
Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SRA) 1. For this misconduct, you received an RIC, dated 21 Mar 03, (Atch 10) (I) You, did, on or about 23 Sep 02, without authority, absent yourself fiom your place of duty at which you were required to be, to wit: 49th Civil Engineering Squadron, located at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, and did remain so absent until on or about 23 Sep 02. You are ordered to...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00383
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NLIMBhR FD-2005-00383 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a vacation, two Letters of Reprimand (LOR'S), Unfavorable Information File, two Records of Individual Coullseling (RIC's), dishonored check notification and an arrest for misconduct. Your actions are a violation of Article 92, for which you received a Letter of Reprimand...