NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDI.,E INI~I'IAI.)
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...........................
I'YPE GEN
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COUNSEI, ANI, OH OHGANIPATION
YES
Nu
X
I
I
AB
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C.............a
RECORD REVIEW
X
AI)IIHFSS AND OR ORCANlZATlON OF COIINSbl
--
-
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 GRADE
MEMBER SITTING
- A -
HON
I
GEN
IJ(~THC ' I OTHER
""
I
IWNY
.-.
VOTE OF THE BOARD
IbSUEb
A94.05
A67.10
I INDEX NUMBER
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED 'I'O THE BOARD
1 1 I ORDER APPOIN'I'ING THE BOARD
2
APPLICA I ION tOR REVIEW OF DISC1 IARGE
1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTII'ICA'I'ION
1 4
1 HRIEF OF PERSONNEI, FI1.F.
COUNSEL'S RELEASE '1'0 '1'tIE BOARD
ADDITIONAI. EXHIBITS SUBMITI'li,I3 A'I' 'TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
-
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPICAKANCE HE
1 1 Jan 2007
.4PPI ICANT'S ISSUE AND THE B O A W ' J DECISl0li.U. PA'TION.\L ARE D l j S I jSFD ON THE ATT\CHEV AIR tOKCE UlSCK\KGE REVIFU' ROARD DECISIONAL IL\l IOS4L.E
I
I
1 FD-2006-00105
1
1
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at tlie applicant's request.
* Reason and Authority
+ Reenlistment Code
. ".
SAFIMRHR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
IiANDOLPM AFU, I'X 78150-4742
SECRET4HI Ok IHL 3IR FORCF PFRZOV\EL COL\CIL
\IR TORCE DISCH\RGL. KLVIL\\ UOARO
I5)5COIl\I4YI) DR. EE \\I\G 3KD kLOOH
ANDREWS AFB. hlD 20762-7002
AFlIQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V?)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NIJMBER
FD-2006-00105
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the Sactors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade ol'discharge, change of reasoil and authority for discharge, and change 01'
reenlistment code are denied.
The Board finds that neither the cvidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Issue 1. Although not explicitly stated, applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because it was too
harsh. He has expressed a desire for upgrade of his discharge to allow for recnlistrnent into the armed
forces. The records indicated the applicant receivcd two Article 15's for misconduct. The first Article 15
was for receiving an order to report to Bolling AFB Clinic for a urinalysis and failcd to report; and for
making a false statement that he reported for the urinalysis testing. He was punished with a reduction in
grade to Airman. His second Article 15 was for failure to go to appointed place of duty; and for making a
false official statement with intent to deceive. He was disciplined with a reduction in grade to Airman Basic.
'Ihe DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ainple opportunities to change
his negative behavior. 'She Hoard concluded the iniscoilduct was a signiiicant departure froin conduct
expected of all military members. 'The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found
to be appropriate.
Issue 2. Applicant contends that he should not be penalized indefinitely for mistakes he made when young .
The DRB recognized the applicant was 21 years of age when the discharge took place. However, there is no
evidence he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The DRH concluded that the characterization
of the applicant's discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.
CONCLUSIONS: 'I'he Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive require~ments of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (BGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recrd a GEN Disch fr USAF Bolling AFB, DC on 21
Sep 00 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals for an Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and
Authority for Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 10 Sep 79. Enlmt Age: 18 0/12. Disch Age: 21 0/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-61, E-68, G-64, M-56. PAFSC: 8G000 - United States Honor Guard.
DAS: 20 J u ~ 98.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 20 Sep 97 - 2 Jun 98 (8 months 13 days)(Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 3 Jun 98 for 4 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 03 Mo 19 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB - 9 Aug 00 (Article 15, 9 Aug 00)
Amn - 8 Mar 00 (Article 15, 8 Mar 00)
A1C - Unknown
Amn - Unknown
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 9 Aug 00, Bolling AFB, DC - Article 86. You did,
within the continental United States, on or about 12 Jul
00, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribe
to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Bldg 48 Duncan
Ave, Bolling AFB, Washington, DC. Article 107. You
did, between on or about 11 Jul 00 and on or ahmt-L?--
Jul 00, with intent to deceive, make to SSgt :
, - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
C ............
appointment in the morning to have blood drawn for your
retraining, which statement was totally false, and was
then known by you to be so false. Reduction to AB.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
:an official statement, to wit: you had an
C.............C
(2) 8 Mar 00, Bolling AFB, DC - Article 92, You, having
.................
-
........
knowledge of a lawful order, issued by Major:
- - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - ) to report to the Bolling AFB, DC, Bolling Clinic,
building 17, for a urinalysis, an order which it was
your duty to obey, did, on or about 16 Dec 99, fail to
obey the same by wrongfully failing to report to the
Bolling Clinic, building number 17 on the date
prescribed. Article 107. You, did, on or about 16 Dec
------------
99, with intent to deceive, make to Capt 1 - - - - - - - - - ,
First Lieutenant : . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -I :) an official statement, to wit:
1 did report for urinalysis testing, which statement was
totally, and then known by you to be so false.
Reduction to Airman. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
-----------
: (then
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 3 Jun 98 - 3 Feb 00 Bolling AFB 2 (1nitial)REF
h. Awards & Decs : AFTR, AFOUA.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (03) Yrs (00) Mos (02) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (03) Mos (19) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 12 Mar 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge)
Issue 1: I would like to upgrade my discharge type and re-enlistment code
to allow me the opportunity to re-enter active duty and continue my military
career.
ATCH
1. Wriiten Response to Article 15 Proceedings.
2. Article 15, 8 Mar 00.
3. Article 15, 9 Aug 00.
4. DD Form 214.
5. Four Letters of Appreciation.
6. Seven Letters of Support.
DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE
1 1 TH WING
MEMORANDUM FOR A01 .....-.-.-.-.-.-.------------------.
,
: 462-59-9456
.....................................
30 Aug 00
USAF HG
FROM: USAF HGlCC
50 Duncan Avenue
Bolling AFB DC 20332-0203
SUBJECT: Notification ~emorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Minor
Disciplinary Infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208,
paragraph 5.49. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized
as honorable or general. I am recommending that your service be characterized as
General without probation and rehabilitation.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. You did, having knowledge of a lawful order, issued by Major i
on 16 December 1999, to report to the Bolling Air Force Base, ~ash'h~fon;-~ki;d~of
Columbia, Bolling Clinic, building number 17, for a urinalysis, an order which it was your
duty to obey.
-----------------------.
:I
You did at or near building number 49, Ceremonial Hall, Bolling Air Force Base,
Washington, District of Columbia, on or about 16 Decerr~ber 1999, fail to obey the same
by wrongfully failing to report to the Bolling Air Force Base, Washington, District of
Columbia, Bolling Clinic, building number 17 on the date prescribed. For these
offenses, you received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, dated 8 March
2000.
b. You did, within the continental United States, on or about 12 July 2000, without
authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Bldg
48 Duncan Ave, Bolling AFB, Washington, District of Columbia. For these offenses,
you received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, dated 9 August 2000.
3. Copies of the documents to be fonvarded to the separation authority in suppofl of
this reco~~rnendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction'or a
higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force.
If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any
special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.
WORLD CLASS PEOPLE ... WORLD CLASS SUPPORT
4. You have the right to counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist
you. I have made an appointment for you to consult the Area Defense Counsel, Bldg 4,
Bolling AFB DC, (202) 404-6580 on 30 August 2000, at 0900 hours. You may consult
civilian counsel at your own expense.
'
5. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the Bolling
AFB Clinic, Annex Bldg 17, at 0945 hours on 31 August 2000 for the examination.
6. You. have the right to submit a statement on your own behalf. Any statements you
want the separatlon au,thority to consider must reach me within 3 duty days of receipt of
this notification, unless you request and receive an approved extension. I will send any
documents you subrrrit to the separation authority.
7. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of
1974. A copy of AFI 36-3208, is available for your use in your orderly room.
L . - . - . . . . - . - . . . . - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l
Commander, USAF Honor Guard
Attachments:
1. Article 15, dtd 8 Mar 00
2. Article 15, dtd 9 Aug 00
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0391
I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD02-039 1 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SRA) 1. Attachments: Article 15, dtd 31 Jan 00.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00275
INDEX NUMBER FD-2003-00275 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SM/'MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D Q EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00276
(No appeal) (No mitigation) .......................... (2) 22 Oct 00, Hurlburt Field, FL - Article 121. HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND (AFSOC) DEPARTMENT OF TElE AIR FORCE =BURT FIELD, FLORIDA 32544-5273 cO-urt-M& Order In the special court-martial case of AIRMAN BASIC i United States Air Force, 16th Transportation Squadron, t h e - i ~ i i n ~ e - i 0 - a ~ b - a 6 ~ ~ 0 d ~ e and confinement for 4 months as promulgated in Special Court-Martial Order No. Plea: G...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00335
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clen~ency, for change of discharge. d. Art 15's: (1) 05 Mar 02, Spangdahlem AB, Germany - Article 86. : United States Air Force, 52d Aimaft CHARGE I: Article 112a Plea: G. Finding: G. Specification: Did,at or near Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, between on or about 1...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00070
The record indicates the applicant received an Article 15 for willfully disobeying an order, wearing a tongue piercing while on base, and making a false official statement. (The following additional infractions were found on AF Form 418,10 Oct 2000): VERBAL COUNSELING, UNDATED - For missed appointment. For this action you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) on 27 Sep 00 (Atch 1b).
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00360
AIR FORCE DlSCllARCE REVIEW BOARD ISIS COMMAND DR, EE WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10761-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMHKH FD-2006-003M) GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. The misconduct included driving without a license, failing to report to supervisor, misrepresenting himself as a senior noncommissioned officer and a...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00151
* Reason and A u t h o r i t y + R e e n l i s t m e n t Code I C-..-.-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.-..,,-..-,.,..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-.......-..-..-..-..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-..-..t - TO: SAFMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 V~~~~~~~~~~~ FROM: - DATE: 1218R006 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10761-7001 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00410
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for possessing marijuana. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00410 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. Additionally, on or about 20 June 1997, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you willfully failed to report the use of some amount of marijuana by two military dependents anda ama member of the 24th Security Forces Squadron, as it was your...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00143
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) -----------------------------------. The applicant had further misconduct and received his first Article 15 for being absent from his appointed place of duty. For your actions, you were punished yourself as an AFOSI agent to Mr.; ....................... undk Article 15, UCMJ, on 18 Mar 04 coniisting of reduction to the grade of airman basic, restriction to Nellis AFB, NV for 45 days, 45 days...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00263
Advisc applicant of the decision of the Board, tlie right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCWIR TO: SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SIJlTE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, 'I'X 78 150-4742 FHOM: SECRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PEKSONREL COUNCIL AIR FORCE UISCIIARGE KEVlEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANI)KF.WS AFR, MI) 211782-70112 INDORSEMENT DA% 3/5/2007 AFHQ FOKM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE...