Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00492
Original file (FD2005-00492.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FI W I '  M I  I)I)I,E  I NrI'IAI .) 
............................. 

C-..-..-..-..-..-..----------l 
TYPE  GEN 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND ORORGANIZATION 

YES 

No 
X 

AIR FORCE DlSCllARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

GRADE 

AB 

AFSNISSAN 
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

RECORD REVIEW 

X 
ADDRESS ANDOH OHGANI/.AIION  OF COUNSEL 

V O ~ $ ~ ~ r n B o r n ~ ~  
DENY 

;, 
1J0111C  I  OI'HEK 

GEN 

7 &Yd 

I 

MEMBER SITTING 

. . . -. .  -- 

HON 

INDEX NIJMOER 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an 
application to the AFBCMR 

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. 

X - Upgrade, Reason and Authority, and RE Code 

AFliQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will  be used 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NllMBER 

FD-2005-00492 

GENERAL:  The  applicant  appeals  for  upgrade  of  discharge  to  honorable,  to  change  the  reason  and 
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. 

'The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but  declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade  of  discharge,  change  of  reason  and  authority  for  discharge,  and  change  of 
reenlistment code are denied. 

The  Roard  finds  that  neither  the  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  the  applicant  substantiates  an 
inequity or impropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

ISSUE:  Applicant received a General discharge for Pattern of Misconduct 

Applicant  contends that  he  was  immature  and not  emotionally  able to  handle  the  situation he  was  in.  He 
states that  two weeks prior  to his  departure  for BMTS his  wife was  shot  in a random  act  of violence.  He 
kept his departure and tried to make it work.  Duc to seriousness of injuries his wife and daughter were not 
able to join  him  in the  service.  These  stresses led to  his misconduct  and  discharge.  The records indicate 
applicant  reccived  an  Article  15, three  Lettcrs  of  Reprimand  and  a  Record  of  Individual  Counseling  h r  
misconduct  including  late for duty, failure to coinplete career developlncnt  course, Sailure to rcport back  to 
work on time and dereliction  oS duty--for underage drinking.  After thorough review of the record  the Board 
found no inequity or impropriety and concluded that the characterization of the discharge was appropriate. 

The Board notes that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, 
the  applicant  should  consider  exercising  his  right  to  make  a personal  appearance  before  the  Roard.  If  he 
should  choose to  exercise  his  right  to  a personal  appearance  hearing,  the  applicant  should bc  prepared  to 
provide the Roard with factual evidence of the inequity and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as 
well as any contributions to the community. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view  of the foregoing findings the Board f~lrther concludes that there exists no lcgal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be  changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB, D 

(Former AB)  (HGH AMN) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl recld a GEN Disch fr USAF Cannon AFB, NM on 13 Jan 
97 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50  (Pattern of Misconduct).  Appeals for Honorable 
Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 27 Nov 77.  Enlmt Age: 17 8/12.  Disch Age: 19 1/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-41,  E-39,  G-36,  M-52. PAFSC: 2A333C -  Tactical Aircraft 
Maintenance Apprentice. DAS: 14 Jan 96. 

b.  Prior Sv:  (1) AFRes 8 Aug  95 -  15 Aug 95  (8 days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 16 Aug 95 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 04 Mo 29 Das, all AMS. 
b.  Grade Status:  AB -  22 Nov 96  (Article 15, 22 Nov 96) 

Amn -  Unknown. 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15's:  (1) 22 Nov 96, Cannon AFB, NM  -  Article 92.  You, who knew 
of your duties, on or about 8 Nov 96, were derelict in 
the performance of those duties in that you willfully 
failed to refrain from drinking alcoholic beverages 
while under the age of 21, as it was your duty to do. 
Reduction to AB, and 45 days extra duty.  (No appeal) (No 
mitigation) 

e.  Additional: LOR, 03 JAN 97 -  Late for duty. 

LOR, 30 DEC 96 -  Failure to report back to work on time. 
RLC, 24 OCT 96 -  Failure to complete CDC. 
LOR/UIF, 15 JUL 96 -  Failure to contact anyone that he 

would be late for duty. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: None. 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFTR, NDSM. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS: (01) Yrs  (05) Mos  (06) Das 
TAMS: (01) Yrs  (04) Mos  (29) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED  FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD  Fm 293) dtd 20 Dec 05. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable Discharge, and Change the RE Code, Reason and 

Authority for Discharge) 

Issue 1:  I am asking that my reentry code be upgraded to one that is 
suitable for me to reenlist into the Armed Services.  I feel that when I 
enlisted in Aug 9 5 '   that I was to  (sic) immature and not emotionally able to 
handle the situation I was in.  Two weeks before I left to BMT my then wife was 
shoot (sic) in a random act of violence.  I kept my departure date and tried to 
make it work.  Due to the seriousness of the injury she and my daughter were not 
able to join me in the service,  Not knowing how to cope and being to immature 
at the time, I felt compelled to find a way out of the Air Force.  That is what 
led me to the misconduct and wrong judgements that I made.  Now ten years later 
I am asking for a second chance to better myself through a career in the Armed 
Services. 

ATCH 
None. 

a  DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FOR ? E 

HEAMUARTER3 2nh AQHTER WING (KC)- 
CANNON MR FOFICE W E .  NEW MEXICO 

FROM: 429 ECSICC 

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum 

1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, 
specifically, a pattern of misconduct.  The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36- 
3208, paragraph 5.50. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as 
honorable or general.  I am recommending  that your service be characterized as general. 

2.  My reasons for this action are: 

a.  On or about 3 Jan 97, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the prescribed 

time, as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand, dated 3 Jan 97 (Atch la). 

b.  Between on or about 26 Dec 96 and on  or about 30 Dec 96, you failed to go to your 
appointed place of duty at the prescribed time, as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand, dated 
30 Dec 96 (Atch 1 b). 

c.  On or about 8 Nov 96, you consumed alcoholic beverages while under the legal drinking 

age, as evidenced by an Article 15, dated 22 Nov 96 (Atch lc). 

d, On or about 24 Oct 96, you still had not completed Volume III of your CDC which were 

due on  10 Oct 96, as evidenced by a Record of Individual Counseling, dated 24 Oct 96 (Atch Id). 

e.  On or about 15 Jul96, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the prescribed 

time, as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand, dated 15 Jul96, and LTIF dted 24 Jul96. (Atch le). 

3.  Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this 
recommendation are attached.  The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are 
discharged, how your service will be characterized.  If you are discharged, you will be ineligible 
for reenlistment in the Air Force.  Special pay, bonuses, or education assistance funds may be 
subject to recoupment. 

4.  You have the right to consult counsel.  Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. 
I have m  de an a 
' at building 327, ext. 2915 on 

1  b@)b  hours.  You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense. 

intrnent for you to consult Captaini 

.-----------. 
. . -. . -. . -. .$ 

5.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 workdays from today unless you request 
and receive an extension for good cause shown.  I will send them to the separation authority. 

6.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

7,  You completed a medical examination at the 27th Medical Group on 8 Jan 97. 

8.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974.  A 
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your unit orderly room. 

, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

............................................... 

Commander, 429 ECS 

Attachments 
1.  Supporting Documents 
2.  Other Derogatory Data 
3,  Airman's Acknowledgment 
norifdoc 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00394

    Original file (FD2005-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right. Applicant contends during his military career, he made some bad decisions, he was young and dumb and didn't have a family yet, and hc now has a family and purpose, currently works for Social Security, and has a career and wants to continue to grow. LOR, 14 NOV 95 - Financial irresponsibility.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00495

    Original file (FD2005-00495.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNISSAN ----------------- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I 1 I I TYPE GEN CoUNSEL YES No I PERSONAL APPEARANCE I RECORDREVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING 1 GRADE AB I I X I .......................................... ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER I A67.10 I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I I 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00001

    Original file (FD2006-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7 ~ 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00001 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. Between on or about 21 Aug 96 to on or about 27 Aug 96, you wrongfully made Automatic Teller Machine cash withdrawals and unauthori~d purchases...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00500

    Original file (FD2005-00500.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNRSAN 1 -..-............., RECORDREVIEW I ' TYPE GEN COUNSEL YES No I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 I SRA I I I IX NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00087

    Original file (FD2004-00087.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although these disciplinary actions were not basis for applicant's discharge the Board took these into account when reviewing the applicant's service record. 'The applicant's record supports the fact that the applicant failed to progress satisfactorily in her 5-level upgrade training, therefore the Board concluded that the characterization and reason of the discharge received by the applicant to be appropriate. You show a lack in progress on your upgrade training, as evidenced by AF Form...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00002

    Original file (FD2007-00002.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to her appointed place of duty. The records also indicated the applicant continued her misconduct and was administratively disciplined for being late for duty, forwarding chain letters over the Air Force email, failure to carry out instructions, sleeping in the lounge during duty hours, disrespect towards an NCO, failure to complete CDCs and test failure, dereliction of duty, failure to go, insubordinate conduct towards an NCO on two...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-0370

    Original file (FD2002-0370.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue: I was issued an improper discharge because of seven minor incidents { ( 7 c ) five Letters of Reprimand and two Letters of ~ounseling}, which became a significant factor to the 4 0 0 t h Missile Unit at F.E. You received an LOR on 1 Apr 97. c. You, at or near Frailcis E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, on or about 18 Fcb 97, failed to go to a Dental appointment. You received an Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 23 Peb 97 d. You were, at or near Cheyenne,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00081

    Original file (FD2003-00081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0081 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. For your actions, you received a LOR on 19 February 1999 (Atch 6).

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00496

    Original file (FD2004-00496.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3 R D FLOOR AM)REWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 ~ - - AF'HQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, five Letters of Reprimand, and six Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. This is evidenced by a Record of Individual Counseling, dated 22 Jan 98. j.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00350

    Original file (FD2004-00350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant does not contest his discharge. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Suspended reduction to Airman, and 14 days extra duty.