-- -
-
-
AIR FORCE DIGCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
INITIAL)
I SRA
TYPF UOTI 1
PERSONAL APPEARANCE . -
NAMF OF I OIIN . , - - -
14a. DESIGNATION OF COMMAND OF CONVENING AUTHORITY
Headquartera, 86th Airlift Wing
V. REFERRAL: SERVICE OF CHARGES
I b. PLACE
1~atnsrein AB, Germany 1 8 September 1999
1 b, DATE
- this headquarters
coum-martial convenod by Special Order AA-30
dated
8 September
1 9 2 , subjacr to the fotlowing imtrumipns: None
FOR THE COMMANDER
Command or O M
Typed Name of Offlcw
n
Staff Judge Advocate
Official Cepac+y of 0ff;cer S p h g
I
.
Colouel
-7
15.
on 8 Septe!ber
-
19%
-
Tmed Nsmc of 7r;al Counscd
-
1 - -
- -
. I (caused to be) served a copy hereof an s
t
h
e
above named accused.
h a w n
Grade or Rank of T h r Counsel
-
-
V
-
FOOTNOTES: 1 - When an apprapriate commander signs personal^, ipsppliceble words a* s f f i k k c ~ .
i
DD M R M 458. AVO 84 IAEVLRSE) IEGVYI
2 -- See R.C.M. 601 (al concemlng insmmcrions. I f none, so $rate.
- J
- -
1 st fnd. DD Fonn 453, Charge Sheet, dated 16 August 1999, Senior Airman
62nd Aerial Por& Squadron (AMC), McChord Air Force Base, Wash~ngton
623 AMSS/CC
TO: 86 AW/CC
1 6 AUG 19%
-
arrival to the 623rd Air Mobility Support Squadron 14 April 1999,
1. Since SrA
his performance in thc load planning section has been noteworthy. He was a valued asset
while coordinating with U,S. A m y and Air Force deploying units during Operation
ALLIED FORCE. He has sincere respect for supervision and his dress and appearance is
exceptional.
- .
2. I recommend the charge be referred to trial by general court-martial. The Security
Forces report of investigation is attached and supports the charge. The victim aud
witnesses have been informed of the charge. Due to the nature of the charge, I do nor
believe retention on active duty is appropriate if he is convicted. The accused is not
subject to the restrictions identified in AFI 31-501, para 8.14.
Commander
Attachments :
1. Personal Data Sheet
2. Report of Investigation
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00340
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) L-..-....-..-....-.-----------. 'I.ER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF 01: PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO TI IE BOARD ADDITIONAI, EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECOKDlNCi OF PERSONAL APPEAKANCE HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER APPLiGANT'S ISSUE AM) T I E BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATl'ONdL ARE DISCIJ9SED OK THE ATTACHED AIK FORCE DISCHARGE R6VIEW BOARD DECISIOYAL RATIONALE I I I Case...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00048
-- Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD-01-00048 (Former SRA) 1. d. AFR 39-10, Chapter 4 , para 4- 2 states "Customarily the service of an airman discharged under this provision will be d as under other than honorable conditions.Il SrA s being discharged in lieu of a court-martial because f marijuana in blatant disregard of Air Force policy. If discharged, the respondent should receive an under other than honorable...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00365
The applicant submitted a request for discharge in lieu of trial by court martial. On 18 Jul05, the accused submitted a request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial undcr AFI 36-3208, Chapter 4. Both 4 AMXSICX and 4 1:WICC recommend the accused's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial be approved and that he receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-0423
PLACE R h e i n - M a i n A i r B a s e , G E c. DATE 2 7 A u g u s t 1 9 8 7 I Referred for trial to the s p e c i a l t h i s h e a d a u a r t e r s d a t e d 24 August court-martial convened by S p e c i a l Order AA-17 19 . The 435 discharge. SSg d USAF Rhei n-Mai n C l i n i c/CC both recommend a UOTHC has received two APRs d u r i n g her c u r r e n t en1 i s t m e n t UNIT ED STATES AIR FORCE SEPTEMBER 18,1947 Right People.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00270
Issue 2: The applicant contends his personality disorders substantially contributed to causing his misconduct and that the Air Force should have diagnosed him earlier, which would have resulted in his receipt of an honorable discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH AMN) MISSING DOCUMENTS 1. 5 Security Forces Squadron, M w R 9 ' ~ CHARGE V: VIOLATION OF THE UCMJ, ARTICLE 134 Specification 1 : In...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00430
ISSUE: Applicant received General discharge for Pattern of Misconduct--Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline Applicant contends that his discharge was a premature act by his commander and his commander failed to act in his time of need specifically to be readmitted into ADAPT program. The records indicate that the applicant received two Article 15s, a Letter o r Reprimand and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct including late for duty, drinking under the age of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00466
SrA Ramos was an NCO at the time of he smoked hashish and deserves the worst service characterization reasonably available. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the request for discharge in lieu of trial by sf~~i~~.-4tc.h,?,Ai.ec!gr~hg.the.-xe~.~ondent with a uOTHC= ,-..-. Caae File CC: 435 TAW/JA w/o Atchs DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 436TH TACTICAL AIRLIFT WINO (MAC) APO NEW YORK 09097-5000 REPLY TO ATTN OF: CC SUBJECT: Request for Discharge in Liau of Trial by Court-Martial, SrA...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00415
ISSUE: Applicant received a UOTHC Discharge - Discharge in Lieu of Court Martial Applicant contends she wishes to apply for and obtain veteran status and benefits for herself and her family and is considering reenlisting in the Air Force or Air Force Reserves before reaching the age of 28. h. Awards & Decs: AFTR i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (04) Mos (06) Das TAMS: (01) Yrs (01) Mos (13) Das 4. PRSFERRAL b. GRADE LL Col e. ORGANIZATIDW OT ACCUSER 552d Training Squadron a DATE ------------ -...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00180
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant received an under other than honorable conditions discharge for misconduct. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for disrespect to a noncommissioned officer in the execution of his duties, and pursuant to his guilty pleas, was convicted...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00342
\!I) 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00342 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full...