A *
7 n , , . r r n r - ...--. -- -- - --
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROARD HEARlNG RECORD
-
ITIAL)
GRADE
ION OF COIJNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
HEARING DATE
1 23 Jan 2006
FD-2005-00250
I
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND T1K ROARD'S DECISIONAL RATlONM, ARP DISCUSShD ON THE ATTACWD AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE
I
I
Case heard via video-teleconference between St. Augustine FL and Andrews AFB, MD.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFRCMR.
Narnes and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
. -
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREEI. WEST, SUlTE 40
RANDOLPH AFR. TX 781 50-4742
SFCRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL C'OCSCIL
AIR FORCE DISCIIARCf U V I E W ROARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3 W FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-7002
AFIIQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NIlhlBER
FD-2005-00250
GENERAT,: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment
code.
Thc applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Roard (DRB), without counsel, via video-
teleconference between St Augustine, FJ., and Andrews AFB, MD on 23 January 2006.
'[hc applicant submitted no additional documents at the hearing.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: TJpgrade of discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied.
The Roard finds that neither the evidcncc of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSll E:
Issue. Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the
service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports,
awards and decorations and other accomplishments. 'They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct
offsct the positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.
CONCLUSIONS: The Llischargc Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided lull administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Hoard further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDFUWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH SrA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr MacDill AFB, FL on 11 Feb 02
UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.54 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 23 Jun 78. Enlmt Age: 19 0/12. Disch Age: 23 7/12. Educ: BS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-67, E-30, (3-50, M-24. PAFSC: 33751 - Fire Protection Journeyman.
DAS: 29 Jun 0 1 .
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 10 Jul 97 - 21 Oct 97 (3 months 12 days)(Inactive).
months 06 days, all AMS. AMN - 22 Apr 98. A1C - 2 2 Feb 9 9 .
EPRs: 5 , 5 , 5 .
SwA - 22 Oct 00.
(2) Enlisted as AB 22 O c t 97 for 4 yrs, Svd: 03 yrs 07
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenlisted as SrA 29 May 01 for 4 yrs. Svd: 00 Yrs 08 Mo 13 D a s , all
AMS .
b. Grade S t a t u s : AB - 21 Dec 01 (~rticle 15, 21 Dec 01)
c . Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 21 Dec 01, Ramstein AB, Germany - Article 92. You, who
knew or should have known of your duties, between on or
about 25 Jul 01, and on or about 22 Nov 01, were
derelict in the performance o f your duties in that you
negligently failed to repay your government travel card,
as it was your duty to do. Article 112a. You did,
within the state of Florida, on divers occasions,
between on or about 1 Aug 00 and on or about 31 Jan 01,
wrongfully use marijuana. Reduction to AB, and a
reprimand. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 10 May 01 - 02 Jan 02 Chievres AB 2 (Cmdr Dir)REF
h. Awards & Decs: AFAM W/1 DEV, AFTR, AFLSAR, AFOUA, AFGCM.
i. Stmt of S v : TMS: ( 0 4 ) Y r s ( 0 7 ) Mos
( 0 2 ) Das
( 0 4 ) Yrs ( 0 3 ) Mos (21) Das
TAMS:
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 2 9 3 ) dtd 18 Jun 0 5 .
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO B R I E F .
ATCH
1. ~pplicant's Issues.
To Whom It May Concern:
My name is
I am writing in regards to my discharge fiom
the United States Air Force. On February 1 1,2002 I was discharged for misconduct with
Under Honorable Conditions (General). I h o w that my actions at the time were
unacceptable and not tolerated. I deeply regret the things I did and would do anyhng to
have those days back, unfortunately, we all know life does not work like that.
I would however, like the board to also look at my file and you will see that my
accomplishments outweigh my failures. I represented the Air Force for four (4) years as a
firefighter honorably. I received the Air Force Achievement Medal with (1) device; Air
Force Training Ribbon; Air Force Longevity Service Medal; Air Force Outstanding Unit
Award and Air Force Good Conduct Medal.
Also I would like the board to h o w that I did not let the discharge discourage me
fiom continuing my education and advancement in the fire service. A couple of months
later I was offered a job as a firefighter for Rural Metro FD at Sikorsky Aircraft in West
Palm Beach.
Finally, I would l i e to thank the board for reviewing my file and giving me the
chance to defend my status as an Honorable Airmen. I would truly appreciate it if the
board would upgrade my discharge to Honorable.
31/01 2002 10:32 FAX 480 9 7 4 1
i
$4'
-. ,/
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
86TH AlRLlR WING (U$AFE)
I .
.......
....
. , ;?; "blp
.......
. , ,..
k\,!*- \,.., ;, ,$ , .+::.-?.?; >,' " :y**j
.
,
rp.;
.
,
-rh ........ ! . ....+Yy.. ;?,!..? :;!,,:,;,: ......!.
j.,, %;5.",i'kJ9;
, j,;+;;$v:,e&, 2rEt~*#~$g$~;j,$i;;g&:'
.
* ,
4 ;
.
; , , , , , , , ,
. . . . . .
;
,;...
" , . ,,,
< . , , ,. c:
.
.
.
,.
7 , .: ':"
,::;
. , . . . .
" . - : -
..........
.
:
1
.:I,..
,..n<.:
.:
t
...,,.,
* . .
.
.
...
, .
.
I
.
..
.!
,
.
.
.
.
, .,
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
:
. :
.
.
.
.
,
...<....
:
..
.
,' $ 2 ; ~
,
, ,
. .
.
, ,
. . /
M; tMOMND *M FOi
FROM: ~ e t
1,86'0(3/6~
t,
.
.
.
.
.
.
,-
.
8
,
.
.
! , ..j;s;*$F~~p.p?~~$Ff~$$&~$~~f~$
."..........
. .
.
.
<
. ,
.
.,.
.
.
, . ,
.
.
.
.
SUBJECT: ~oti.fication Mm~oranduln
1. I arn rccommendiay your discharge froin the United States Air Forcc for Dl-g Abuse. 'he
authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54. if my
rswmcnd ation i s itpproyed, your service will bc chwactcri;r.ed,as hoi~o~ablrlc or ~enl;r+l. I a111
rdc~mmending that your sc&ce be cheractcrbdd as g e u ~ ~ a l .
. .
2. My reason for this actio)~ is I ~ : I [ you wrongfully used marijuana, a Scheclulc 1 controlled
substance. For this incident, you rcceivcd nonjudicial punishn~ent duted 2 1 December 2001.
Acldilionally, a-11 unfavorable inforrnntioil file (UIF) was estabjished (Atch la).
are attached. The cornmai~der exercising SPCM jurisdictio~~ or a l~igher
3 Copies of the documa-~ts to be forwarded to the separation aulliarity is suppbrt of this
recoi~~n~e~~dat.ion
aulhority will dccide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force m d , if you ai-e
disch~pcd, how your service will be chatacicrized. If yoti are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reelilistment in !hc USAF, and ally special pay, b o n ~ ~ s , or education assistance funds may be
subject to recoupment.
4. You h,ave the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist
you, I have made an appointment for you to consult with,
Area Defcnsc Co'unsel, Ramstein AB, GE, Building 2111, DSN 480-218212432 an
23 JI(C-FJ 0 1
expense.
at (0-9 hours. You \nay consult civil~ix~i cou~lsel at your own
-1
5. You have the right to submit statcrnents in your own behall'. Any statements you want
the sepurelion authority to consider must reach me by Zg'SArJ ua2 at lZwJ> hours
unless yo11 request nnd ~Aeceive an extensiou for good cause shown. I will send (hem lo the
separation autholi ty
6. li'you fai.1 to co~isult coit,nscl or l o su.bmit stateinents in your own behalf, your failure will
col~sfirutc a waiver of your right to do so.
31/01 2002 1 0 : 3 2 FAX 480 0 7 4 1
86 AWIJAM
@I 000
you. If you wear contacts, you must be able to remove them
2. Airman's liecciyt of Notiiicatio~i Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00050
TX 78 150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00050 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00151
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 6 Apr 04 (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I believe my discharge of General Under Honorable Conditions is damaging on my behalf. Copies of the documents to be fonvarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00234
If you need more space, submit additional issues on an attachment. For this misconduct, you received an LOR dated 25 Oct 02. f. On or about 5 Oct 02. vou failed to obey a lawful no contact order issued by myself to have no contact with 21 Nov 02, with the following punishment: reduction to the grade of airman basic, forfeiture of $552.00 (suspended), restriction to Malmstrom AFB, MT for 45 days, 45 days extra duty, and a reprimand. Supporting documents: a, LOR dated 30 Sep 02 b. GFPD...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00025
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation, a Letter of Reprimand, and a Record of Individual Counseling for misconduct. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0174
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE} pp97-90339 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Member subsequently reported her husband’s drug abuse to her First Sergeant; he referred her to family advocacy. Receipt of Notification Memorandum, 12 Feb 02 b. Member’s Response, 19 Feb 02 * 99/89/2082 = 13:37 Fd 2c02- 2 ID NR.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD99-00220
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN De) AMN | <
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00145
ISSUE: Applicant acknowledged that his actions were wrong and that he had a problem with alcohol. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD . Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00350
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGW A1C) 1. Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00034
He had additional inisconduct and was administratively disciplined for financial irresponsibility, being late for work, missing a mental health appointment, and taking 30 Motrin with wine and drove a vehicle while impaired which caused an accident. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate, Issue 2. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00147
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's UOTHC discharge is too harsh and upgrades it to a General. The records indicated the applicant received an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge for misconduct, specifically, drug use. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I request that the "other than honorable" discharge from service dated 19971009 be upgraded to an honorable discharge.