Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00267
Original file (FD2005-00267.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
... .... ,\..'..'.....,. '. ............ -  .I....  ..--...... ........ .. ,&, ' 1 l.I.41,) 

AIR FOKCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

-- 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

GRADE 

A I..c*,,rc A -1 

SRA 
I 

X 

RECORDREVIEW 

I  ADDRESS A S D  OR ORG.4YIMTIOI OF C O I S E L  

Ti--- 
i 
I 

1

 

-

1 

MEMBER SITTING 

liON 

GEN 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

I  U0111<' 

OI.HEK 

I  DbNY 

I \ I M   1 \ L \ l n l   K 

A67.10 

X 

1 
2 
3 
4 

I 

EXHIBITS SUBMIlTED TO THE BOARD 

ORDER APPOIN 1 I N 0  THb HOARI) 

APPLICAI'ION  FOR  KFVIPW OF  Dl)<  HAKGt 
L F T E R  OF NO1 IFICATION 
RR1F.F O F  I'FRSONNCI  FILb 
C0UNSE.L S RtLbASb rO Ti31  ROAKD 
ADIII 1 IONAL EXtiIBI TS SUBMITTCII A l  TIME. Or 
I't  KSONAL  APPEAKANCt 

TAPL RECOKIIINO O F  I'L  IISONAI  APPF AKANC I 

<  \\k  \L\lBLK 

I 

I 

1  FD-2005-00267 

1  27 Dec 2005 
I I  Zt'i'l  A K i  ' S  IhS[!l:  A N I )  !Ill. I!OARL)'S  i>l.C'ihIONAl. IIAIIONAI. ARL; lllS('USSii1)  ON 11II: A'1'I~A~:IIl;I) AlK  f'OIICE I~ISC'IIAlICih KLVII-.W  HOAAI) I)t.I'ISIUNAJ.  l(A'L1ONAl.I~ 
I /  Cast. heard  Washington, D.C. 

i 1  hdvi\c applicilnt of  the decision of  the Board. the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to 

j  submil an  ;~pplication to the AFBCMR. 
I 
I i Names and votes will  be  made available to the applicant at  the applicant's  request. 

, -. - . - 

0

 

I 

I

--  - - 

--- 
, 

n r r n ~ ~ & M E W  

VAI I%  tLIZ2ittWS 

I

l

T

-

 
SECRETARY OF THE .4lR FORCE PERSONSEL COLNCIL 

- 

I 
il______- 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077. JAN  00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

AYDREWS AFB.  MI) 20762-7002 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAKL) DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

C A S t  N U h l B t H  

m-2005-00267 

GENEIUL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. 

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before  the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but  declined to 
cxcrcise this right. 

The attached brief  colltaiils available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of  discharge is denied. 

Thc  Board  finds  the  applicant  subrnilted  no  issues contesting the  equity or propriety  of  the  discharge, and 
after  a  thorough  review  of  the  record, the  Board was  unable to  identify any  that  would justify  a change of 
discharge. 

ISSUE: 

Applicant  received a  General Discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions.  The records 
indicatcld the applicant received five Letterc of  Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, and  two Records of 
lndiviciual Counseling for misconduct to include disrespect to an officer, failure to follow orders, failure of 
dormilory room  inspection, disrespectful behavior to instructors and individuals in  the chain of command, 
numerous occasions of  being late for work, dereliction of duty, lying, and disrespect to an  NCO.  The DRB 
opined that lhrough these administrative  actions, the applicant had  ample opportunities to change her 
rlegalive behavior.  The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected 
ot all ~nilital y  members.  The chnracterization of  the discharge received by  the applicant was found to be 
appropriate. 

C:ONCLlrSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive  requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of  the 
clj\charge authority iind that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In  view  of the  foregoing findings the Board further concludes  that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Fsarniner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

(Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Wright-Patterson AFB, OH on 
17 Mar 05 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49  (Misconduct -  Minor Disciplinary 
Infractions).  Appeals for Honorable Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 14 Nov 82.  Enlmt Age: 17 6/12.  Disch Age: 22 4/10. Educ: HS DIPL 

AFQT: N/A.  A-79,  E-70,  G-78,  M-55. PAFSC: 4T031 - Medical Lab Apprentice. 
DAS: 04 Aug 03. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 31 May 00 -  11 Jul 00  (1 month 11 days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 12 Jul 00 for 6 yrs. Svd: 04 Yrs 08 Mo 06 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  SrA -  25 Dec 02 
A1C -  25 A u ~  00 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15's:  None. 

e.  Additional: LOR, 
LOR, 

01 DEC 04 - 
26 AUG 04 - 

LOR, 

09 AUG 04 - 

LOR, 
LOC , 
LOR, 

20 JUL 04 - 
10 MAY 04 - 
02 JUL 03 - 

RIC, 
RIC, 

30 APR 03 - 
07 APR 03 - 

Late for work on numerous occasions. 
Dereliction of duty and disrespect to an 
NCO . 
Late for work on three occasions and 
lying. 
Dereliction of duty. 
Late for work. 
Disrespectful behavior to instructors and 
individuals in chain of command. 
Failed dormitory room inspection. 
Disrespect to an officer and failure to 
follow orders. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: 12 Jul 00 -  11 Mar 02  Shaw AFB  4  (Initial) 

12 Mar 02 -  01 Dec 03  Wright-Patterson AFB 4  (Annual) 
02 Dec 03 -  01 Dec 04  Wright-Patterson AFB 2  (Annua1)REF 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFTR, NDSM, AFLSAR, AFOUA. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS:  (04) Yrs  (09) Mos  (15) Das 
TAMS:  (04) Yrs  (08) MOS (06) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 05 Jul 05. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable) 

,.NO ISSUES SUBMITTED. 

dl 

k*; 

. 

ATCH 
1. Request and Authorization for Separation. 
2. DD Form 214 (Member-1) . 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

88th Medical Group 

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR  FORCE BASE OHIO 

MEMORANDUM ~0v-m 

FROM:  88 DTSICC 

SUBJECT:  Notification Memorandum 

2 Feb 05 

1.  I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct - Minor 
Disciplinary Infractions.  The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, 
Paragraph 5.49.  If  my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as 
honorable or general.  I am recornmending.that your service be characterized as under honorable 
conditions (general). 

2.  My reasons for recommending discharge under AFI 36-3208, Para 5.49 are: 

a. On 5 May 04, you had to leave work to pick up your child from the Base Daycare 

facility.  This was the third time in three weeks that Microbiology needed to replace you in the 
drawing room during peak operation times.  Your departure resulted in short-falling other 
sections in the laboratory.  For this you received a Letter of  Counseling dated 10 May 04. 

-, you were seen as a patient in the Emergency Room.  By your request 
a HCG pregnancy test from a urine specimen provided by you.  At the time 
it was necessary to order a urinalysis as well as a culture and sensitivity. The 

next day you noticed while accessing CHCS that a culture and sensitivity were ordered on your 
specimen and you cancelled the lab test.  You explained that you cancelled the test because you 
had reservations because it was not collected under sterile conditions.  While in the ER you were 
given a random urine cup and a large bin for easy collection.  As a laboratory technician that 
works in microbiology you knew these were not the proper conditions for a culture and 
sensitivity test.  By canceling the lab test without first consulting with the physician you violated 
the medical authority given to a practicing physician to make the necessary clinical judgments 
regardless of the viability of  the sample submitted.  For this you received a Letter of  Reprimand 
dated 20 Jul04. 

c. On 9 Aug 04, you were scheduled to work from 1000 to 1800 hours.  On Friday 6 Aug 04, 

to Switch shifts with you on the following Monday.  Sr 

greed 

you asked SrAq 

to work the evemng s  ift and you were to work the 0700 to 1600 hours shift. 
schedule was not mentioned to, nor approved by the Officer-in-Charge.  On Monday you failed 
to show up for work at 0700 hours as you had agreed to.  When SrA -was 
why he was not at work, he stated that you and he had changed shifts.  When you were called at 
home by your supervisor he was told that you had an appointment.  You did not show up for 
work until 1000 hours.  For the above actions you received a Letter of Reprimand dated 
9 Aug 04. 

called to ask 

d.  On 13 Aug 04, you came to work at 1000 hours and asked S~A- 

help you read the 
.'gram stain associated with the wet prep, stating that you had trouble reading some portion of the 
slide.  When entering the gram stain portion of the wet prep SrA p o i n t e d  out to you that 
the wet prep had not been resulted in the computer.  Your res  onse was that it was negative and 
you then completed the results in CHCS.  At that time, A1 b - a p p r o a c h e d  you to ask the 
status of  the KOH prep as it was still in the pending list she was work;ng on.  You replied that it 
was already in the compu&.  When A~C-e-stated 
that the result w$  not in the 
com  uter and the test was still pending. You by your own admission to  and 
Cap%, 
dated 

replied 'Whatever Bitch"  For the above actions you received a Letter of  Reprimand 
ug 04. 

e. On 8 Nov 04, you were scheduled to take a Career Development Course end-of course 

examination at 0730 hours.  Following the completion of the exam you were required to report 
directly back to your duty section.  Although you left the base education center by 0915 hours, 
you did not return to your duty section until 1130 hours.  On 22 Nov 04 you again reported to 
work 30 minutes late.  For these actions you received a Letter of Reprimand dated 1 Dec 04. 

Your other behavior documented below and in the attached Memorandums For Record (MFR) 
are enough to recommend your service be characterized as under honorable conditions (general). 

f. On 31 Jul04, you were scheduled for duty from 0545 to 1500 hours and you did not show 

up until 0625 hours.  Individuals assigned to work the weekend shift are responsible to be at 
work at 0545 hours and be on the wards to perform rounds no later than 0600 hours. 

,, 
1 

g. On 6 Aug 04, you were scheduled for duty from 0700 to 1600 hours.  At or about 0650 you 
called SSgt Adams and said that you would be about 5 to 10 minutes late for work.  You did not 
show up until 0725 hours. 
'B. 

h.  0% 12 Aug 04,  wet prep and KOH prep were accessioned into the laboratory at 1515 and 
sent back to Microbiology a short time later.  By your own admission you  did not complete either 
test at that time, even though both tests were ordered ASAP.  You furthermore did not contact 
any of  the supervisors to request help in accomplishing these test in a timely manner, choosing 
instead to hold the specimen over night.  The KOH prep is requested ASAP because it is a time 
sensitive test and delay in analysis can and will cause inaccurate patient results to be reported. 

3.  Copies of  the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this 
recommendation are attached.  The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction  or a hi  her 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air F o m  aridYalf you are 
service will be characterized.  If you are dscharged, you will be ineligible 
& s ~ h a r ~ e d , ' i - $ ~ w . ~ ~ u r  
for reenlistment in the Air Force. 

fi. 

a

p

t

i

a

 Area Defense Counsel, Building 199, Gttyhawk 

4.  Military legal counsel, c
Area, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, (937) 257-784-1, has been obtained to assist you.  An 
appointment has been scheduled for you to consult her on 2 Feb 05 at 1300 hours. Instead of the 
appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military 
service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201, Administration of 
Military Justice.  In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. 
The Air Force does not pay expenses incident to the employment of  civilian counsel.  Civilian 
counsel, if employed, must be readily available. 

6.  You must schedule yourself for a medical examination through Tricare or your Primary Care 
physician.  The attached Medcal Assessment letter must be completed at thgmedical 
examination and turned in to your commander with your rebuttal to t h s  discharge action. 

8gh Diagnostic & ~ h e r i ~ e u t i c s  Sq 
Commander 

Attachments: 
1. ID card letter 
2.  TMO letter 
3.  Finance's Outprocessing Checklist 
4.  Medical Assessment Letter 

1''  Ind 

I understand the above mandatory briefings and appointments I must attend. 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0449

    Original file (FD2002-0449.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ! NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN | A ie TYPE Be, PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW "COUNSEL = “NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES NO X | VOTE OF: THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON “GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX X X L 1 xX —

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00467

    Original file (FD2004-00467.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2004-00467A (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) (REHEARING) 1. h. On or about 7 Jun 95 you reported to work late and on or about 19 Oct 95 you failed to complete a given task for which you received a Letter of Counseling on 23 Oct 95. : PO x20 20467 4 i, On or about 12 May 96 you was driving at an unreasonable rate of speed for which you received a traffic ticket and a Letter of Counseling on 8...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00374

    Original file (FD2006-00374.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 (TYPE CEN I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I PERSONAL APPEARANCE GRADE 1 AIC 1 x I RECORDREV~EW MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 'The miscoilduct included failure to go, wearing civilian clothes during duty hours, failure to follow a direct order, dereliction of duty, conduct unbecoming, malingering, failure to complete assigned tasks, insubordinate conduct towards a noncommissioned officer. Because of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00071

    Original file (FD01-00071.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Nonetheless, in view of the relatively minor nature of the applicant’s misconduct when juxtaposed with his previous excellent duty performance, the Board concluded that the applicant’s then existing and continued mental health issues provided sufficient mitigation to warrant the upgrade of the applicant’s discharge characterization and reason. In this case, misconduct is the primary basis for the recommended discharge. [am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00100

    Original file (FD2003-00100.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 I 1 1 I r AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE 1NITML) MEMBER SITTING GRADE AFSNISSAN I I AIC I Florida Department of Veteran's Affairs 1 ( ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION I 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 HEARING DATE 19 Apr 2004 CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00266

    Original file (FD2005-00266.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    LOC, 25 APR 04 - Failure to obey a lawful order and lack of LOR, 06 FEB 04 - Failure to go at the time prescribed. For this offense you received a LOR on 4 Jun 04 (Atch 11). If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance hnds may be subject to recoupment.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00143

    Original file (FD2005-00143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and four Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. ATCH None DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 347TH SECURITY FORCES SQUADRON MOODY AFB, GEORGIA 31699 MEMORANDUM FOR SRA : L...................-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.'

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00447

    Original file (FD2005-00447.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received two Article 15's and a Letter of Reprimand for misconduct. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. AF Form 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, 13 Aug 04 3.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00233

    Original file (FD2005-00233.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty and for bcing disrespectful in language to an NCO, a Vacation of Suspended Reduction in Grade for i'ailure io go at the lime prescribed lo his appointed place of duty, a Letter of Reprimand for lying to his OIC, 21nd two Letters of Counseling, one for failure to go and one for failing to report to work as scheduled. I n ~ i e w 01' the foregoing findings the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00111

    Original file (FD2004-00111.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -- DCNY -1 -1 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 1 2 3 ( LETTER OF NO.I'IPICATION 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEI. For your actions, you received an LOR on 2 Oct 02. For your actions, you received an LOR on 9 Jul03.