I
i
I
1
I
-
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 Y 4MF: OF SFRVTrr; Mvnm"" - ' ;T, FIRST MIDL)LE 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 , )
I
~
I
,
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X
~
~
I
~
NAME OF COUNSEL ASU OR ORGANIZ4TION
4
~
~
:
Y
P
~
I Nn
T
-
t
YES
-
GRADE
I AMN
/
I
I
AFSNISSAN
1
I
RECORDREVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
ISSUES A94.06
. i'
HEARING DATE
--
-
CASE NUMBER
1 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
/ 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 / L E T E R OF NOTIFICATION
4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TLME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
1 TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
1
I
15 Nov 2005
V P 1 I W S 1SJUt AND nil' RUMD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE UISCUSSED LW at.: ATliPCHQD AIR KHCE MSCW&GF WlkW BOARD m S W N A L RATIONAIE
1 Case hcard at Washington, D.C.
I
1 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR
I
I 1 Nanles and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
i
1 SlGPiATUKE OF W.CORDER ,
SIGNATURE OF B-QRRD PRESIDENT
-
S.417MRBR
5.50 (: STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RASDOI.PH AFB, 1X 781 i0-4741
-
SECRETARY OF TtlE AIK FORCE PERSONNEL COL'NCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE RFVIEW B O A W
I535 COMMAND DQ EE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant appeared and testified before the Di
h d r e w s AFB, MD, on 15 Nov 2005.
applicant's behalf.
view Board (DRB), without counsel, at
retired USAF TSgt, also testified on the
The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:
Exhibit 6: Eighteen character letters
Exhibit 7: Motor Vehicle Report dated 15 Nov 05
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The discharge is upgraded to honorable; however, change of reason and authority for
discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record
or that provided by the applicant substantiates an impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by the applicant, the Board finds the applicant's
characterization of discharge inequitable.
ISSUE: Applicant received a general discharge for a pattern of misconduct and conduct prejudicial to good
order and discipline.
Applicant contends that he was treated unjustly in that his second Article 15 was his only improper act and
caused the only instance in which he was in trouble during his entire stay at his permanent duty station
(most of which was spent overseas), that he personally volunteered to extend his deployments so that others
would have the opportunity to go home to their families, that some higher ranking individuals might have
felt he was not a team player since he preferred to shy away from the politics/personal bias of his fellow
soldiers, and that he was never late for, never compromised, and always completed missions he was
assigned. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, one for being drunk and disorderly
while in Tech School, and the other for being incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties as a
result of previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor within 12 hours of takeoff, and for being drunk and
disorderly on another occasion, as well as one Letter of Reprimand for failure to show. Testimony revealed
that applicant was deployed and volunteered the information that he did have one drink within 12 hours of
the original takeoff time only after he learned that the alert time had been slipped due to mechanical
problems; in fact, the flight was subsequently delayed for over 30 hours. The drunk and disorderly charge
stemmed from numerous deployed personnel taking part in some horseplay which testimony revealed was
more or less standard fare during these deployments. Testimony also revealed that member was returned to
the CONUS after the drunk and disorderly incident and, for the next six months, flew only two missions
(over the Christmas Holidays) due to a senior NCO in his chain of command refusing to put him on the
flying schedule despite applicant never being officially DNIFed. The Board took note of the excessive
length of time it took to render the applicant the Article 15 upon his return to CONUS (approximately 4
months) and that it was rendered by individuals who were not in the deployed location, as well as the fact
that it took approximately 6 months to subsequently discharge him after his return to the CONUS. The Board
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that the overall quality of
applicant's service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge, and that the applicant's
characterization should be changed to Honorable under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Pope AFB, NC on 18 Jun 04 UP
AFI 36-2308, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good
Order and Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 13 Sep 80. Enlmt Age: 20 10/12. Disch Age: 23 9/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-81, E-82, G-80, M-78. PAFSC: 1A231 - Aircraft Loadmaster
Apprentice. DAS: 31 Oct 02.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 16 Jul 01 - 14 Nov 01 (03 mos 29 days)(Inactive).
3 .
SERVICE UNDER RFVIEW:
a. Enlisted as Amn 15 Nov 01 for 4 years. Svd: 02 Yrs 07 Mo 04 Das, all
AMS .
b. Grade Status: Amn - 23 Mar 04 (Article 15, 23 Mar 04)
A1C - 15 Sep 02
Examiner's Note: Reduction to AB from Article 15 was
never updated. At the time, he was TDY enroute PCS and promotion
automatically updated.
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 23 Mar 04, Pope AFB, NC - Article 134. You were, at or
near Amman, Jordan, on or about 14 Nov 03, as a result
of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating
liquor, incapacitated for the proper performance of your
duites. You, were, at or near A1 Udeid Air Base, Qatar,
on or about 2 Dec 03, drunk and disorderly. Article 92.
You did, at or near Amman, Jordan, on or about 14 Nov
03, violate a lawful general regulation, to wit:
paragraph 3.32, AFI 11-2C130V3, dated 1 Apr 00, by
wrongfully consuming alcoholic beverages within 12-hours
of takeoff. Reduction to the grade of Arm and
Reprimand. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation)
(2) 18 Sep 02, Little Rock AFB, AR - Article 134. You
were, on or about 23 Aug 02, drunk and disorderly which
conduct was of a nature to bring discredit upon the
armed forces. Reduction to AB. Thirty days
correctional custody, suspended. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 10 MAR 04 - Failure to go.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 15 Nov 01 - 14 Jul 03 Pope AFB 4 (1nitial)REF
h. Awards & Decs: AAM W/1 OLC, AM, NDSM.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (02) Yrs (11) Mos (03) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (07) Mos (04) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 15 Mar 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applications Issues.
2. Five Character References.
3. Personal Information Printout.
May 5,2005
To whom it may c o n c b .
would like to relay the following events to you, the way I see them. I
art with the Article 15 that resulted in a loss of Rank fiom A1 C to AMN
and set in motion the chain of events that eventually ended in my discharge from the Air
Force. The behavior that prompted the aforementioned Article 15 was my only improper
act and caused the only instance in which I was in trouble during my entire stay at my
permanent duty station. I was there for almost two years, most of which was spent
overseas. I personally volunteered to extend my deployments every chance I got, so that
others would have the opportunity go home to their families. I wasn't married and I would
not be able to go home to see my parents in Seattle, so it seemed like the most logical,
decent thing to do. On top pf that, I personally enjoyed flying the missions and competing
in the weight lifting competitions. (Ali of which I won for my weight class).
I think that some of the higher ranking individuals felt I was not a team player, but only
because I preferred to shy away from the politics/personal bias of my fellow soldiers.
While I was at Pope AFB I did notice a lot of favoritism and opportunities based on
personal relations and not on performance and capability. Pope AFB was to be my first and
last duty assignment in the Air Force. Following is my interpretation of the events that led
to my discharge:
Lrdczn
1. On the day in question in Amm
we w-ere scheduled to check out at
bby and was the only one from my crew down
approximately 03 15. I arrived do
there.'I saw another aircrew down in the Iobby havYng"a few drinks. They had just arrived a
short time earlier. This was the crew that brought in the MkI' (Mission Repair Team). I
asked them if they had seen my crew, to which they replied that they had not and they had
heard that I was not going to be leaving that day. They said the repairs would take far
longer then one morning, and we would be looking at least another day. They then invited
me to have a drink with them and stay awhile. 1 accepted. About a half an hour later I
returned to my room. I called another member of my crew to convey how appreciative I
was that I was the only one down in the lobby at 03 15. It turned out the alert time was
slipped to 0800 and I was not informed. I admit I was tired because I had already woken up
for two alerts, but I was not drunk. I could have performed my duties as well as I had on all
the other missions. It turns out it was my turn to b e the secondary Loadmaster anyway, but
I feel confident that I was of sound mind to act in any Loadmaster capacity. We had two
Loadmasters for that particular mission and no cargo to unload or upload and none
scheduled for pick up. That meant that I was basically a passenger with the Primary
Loadmaster. I had informed my crew that they plane was not had not been fully repaired.
When we got to the plane we confirmed that was the case. We ended up not leaving that
day and left the following day, over 30 hours fiom the initial alert time. I later told Captain
Messick that I showed up for the original time and no one was there and that I had Jack
and Coke with the other crew. He then made a decision then that it was not a problem
considering the facts of the matter. We both agreed that in the future it was better to wake
up the Aircraft commander if there was ever any doubt again. That was the last I heard of
this matter until I received an Article 15 for it state side.
2. On the day in question at Alludeid AB, I had my allotted three beers. I was not out of
control. My friends and I were having are own "worlds strongest man competition" just out
side the "wagon wheel". When it was my turn, I shot put a single sand bag so far it hit the
side of the Persko tent. I was not throwing multiple sand bags and I was not trying to
destroy or hurt anything or anyone. I then returned to my side of the base. That's when I
walked into a tent where one of my fellow crewmen was hanging out. I was told half
heatedly to just go sleep it off and that I was probably in trouble for the "sand bag thing".
I finally agreed and started walking back to my tent. On my way back I saw MSgt Kelly, I
always trusted him, so I thought him the appropriate person to give my small container of
rum to. I had gotten the rum from another crew that was just trying to keep up moral. I
figured if it had caused that much of a problem I wanted nothing to do with it. I voluntarily
gave this to him. I just wanted to come clean about everything right then and there. If
questioned I'm sure he will convey these facts. I then went to sleep. Around 0600, I woke
t to the bathroom, on the way back I encountered a very distraught MSgt
as very poiite and courteous to him even though he would not let me speak. He
e of going out to the chow hall, after I was ordered to go to bed. He had no
proof. I then went back to sleep after he threatened to lock me up. I would have gone back
to sleep without the threat. I was well within my time to start crew rest for a next mission if
one would have come up. Crew rest is 12 hours officially but many crews know well in
advance of their next mission. Most of the time we had 24 to 48 hours of down time
between missions.
Sirs, I ask that you further take into consideration that I had never been late for a mission. I
had never compromised a mission and I had always completed the mission in which I had
been given. I understand that I was at fault for all of these incidents, and I can do nothing
now but look back with regret for what could have been a very promising Air Force career.
I have almost given up on being a police officer or a firefighter due to the fact that I don't
have an honorable discharge. I also had a promising opportunity with Halliburton, but
when I sent in my DD-214 they systematically cut ties. Border Patrol seemed less
enthusiastic with me after they learned about the less than full honorable discharge. My
DD-214 states that I have a "Pattern of Misconduct". To be honest I wouldn't hire anyone
with that either.
%
I sometimes feel like the time I spent flying missions supporting the war doesn't matter to
anyone. That doesn't make me any less proud of serving our country, it just makes me
wish I could go back and change some things. For all that I have done I am truly sorry, but
I still believe that I was treated unjustly. I have included several character statements fiom
people I served with. These people believe that I was a good soldier and so do I. Thank
you for your time.
DEPARTMENT OF 'THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 43D AIRLIFT WING (AMC)
POPE AIR FORCE BASE NORTH CAROLINA
FROM: 2 ASICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct: A Pattern
of Misconduct, Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline. The authority for this action is
AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2. If my recommendation is approved, your service
will be characterized as an Under Honorable Conditions (General) Discharge. I am recommending
that your service be characterized as an Under Honorable Conditions (General) ~ i s c h a r ~ e .
2. My reason for this action is:
a. On or about 14 Nov 03, at or near Amman, Jordan, as a result of wrongful previous
overindulgence in intoxicating liquor, you were incapacitated for the proper performance of your
duties, as documented by an AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudical Punishment Proceedings, dated
23 Mar 04.
b. On or~about 14 Nov 03, you did, at or near Amman, Jordan, violate a lawful regulation, to
wit: paragraph 3.32, Air Force Instruction 11-2C130v3, dated 1 Apr 2000, by wrongfully
consuming alcoholic beverages within 12 hours of takeoff, as documented by an AF Form 3070,
Record of Nonjudical Punishment Proceedings, dated 23 Mar 04.
c. On or about 1 Mar 03, you failed to show for your Emergency Procedures Evaluation at your
appointed place of duty, to wit: building 738 at 0800, as documented by a Letter of Reprimand
(LOR), dated 10 Mar 04.
d. On or about 23 Aug 02, at or near Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas, you were drunk
and disorderly, which conduct was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, as
documented by an AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudical Punishment Proceedings, dated
18 Sep 02.
3. The 43d Airlift Wing Commander, who exercises SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authority, will
decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force. Copies of the documents to be
forwarded to the Separation,Authority in support of this recommendation are attached. If you are
discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force, and any special pay, bonus, or
education assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.
4. Military legal counsel may be obtained to assist you. Contact SS
2362) at the Area Defense Counsel's office, at that time an appointment will be scheduled for
you to consult the Area Defense Counsel. You may consult civilian counsel at your own
(extension 4-
expense. The Air Force does not pay expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel.
Civilian counsel, if employed, must be readily available.
5. You have the right to submit a statement in your behalf. Any statements you want the
Separation Authority to consider must reach me by a&& at dqm unless you request and
receive an extension for good cause shown. Any submitted statements will be forwarded to the
Separation Authority.
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your behalf in three days, your failure
will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You have been scheduled for a physical examination. Report to the Pope AFB Family Practice
Clinic on 3m%,d at 0930
screening.
hours. In addition, report to the Lab ASAP to receive HTV
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy
of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at http://www.e-publishing.af.miV.
9. Execute the attached acknowledment and return it to me imrnediatelv.
Commander
Attachments:
1. AF Form 3070, dated 23 Mar 04 (3 pgs)
2. Written Presentation to AF Form 3070, dated 22 Mar 04
3. Written Presentation to AF Form 3070, dated 27 Mar 04
4. LOR, dated 10 Mar 04
5. AF Form 3070, dated 18 Sep 02 (3 pgs)
6. Receipt of Notification Memorandum
I
AIR FORCE DISCIIARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (1 . A R T , FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
TYPE GEN
CVNSEC
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
- I
I
MEMBER SITTING
ISSUES A92.35
I
I
.,.dEY NUMBER
A67.50
I HEALING DATE-
) 06 Dec 2005
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DlSClJSSED ON THF: ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
- - -
I
I
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME O F
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDWG O F PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
I --
TO:
---
INDORSEMENT
-
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
I
1
-
-
DATE: lU612005
-
--
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCt DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COhlhMND D R LI: WIWC. 3RD FI.OOR
ANDREWS AFB. ~~'20762-7002'
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
1 AFSNISSAN
I
IX
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
RECORDREVIEW
I
/ON 1
VOTE O F THE B O W ; 3' ;.'
I DENY
I OTHER
I UOTHC
GEN
I
I
~ 2 3 0 + G & - $ 2 i ' ~ ' c ~
I
I
,
I
EXHIBITS S U B ~ I M S D ~ ] ~ ~
1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
1 2 / APPLICATION FOR REVIEW O F DISCHARGE
' 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFlCATlON
4 ) BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
I
I
+
]
I
I
I
1
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00451
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant stated that his discharge was based on one isolated incident in 27 months of
otherwise exemplary service. The records indicated the applicant received two Articles 15, and a Special
Court-martial for misconduct. The misconduct included driving under the influence on two separate
occasions, resisting arrest, drunk and disorderly and communicating a threat to a law enforcement officer.
1 The Special Court-martial found the applicant guilty of failing to obey a lawful order not to operate a motor
vehicle while on Langley AFB, Virginia. The Board found that the seriousness of that misconduct
outweighed the applicant's otherwise satisfactory service. The characterization of the discharge received by
the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Langley AFB, VA on 26 Jun 98.
UP AFI 36-3208 (Misconduct. Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 17 Mar 75. Enlmt Age: 20 7/12. Disch Age: 23 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-Unknown, E-Unknown, G-Unknown, M-Unknown. PAFSC: 2A331B - F-
15/Flll Avionics Systems Apprentice. DAS: Unknown.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 3 Nov 95 - 28 Feb 96 (3 months 26 days) (~nactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 29 Feb 96 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 3 Mo 29 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: Amn - 17 Mar 98 (Art 15, 17 Mar 98)
A1C - Unknown.
Amn - Unknown.
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 17 Mar 98, Langely AFB, VA - Article 95. You did, on
or about 9 Feb 98, resist being apprehended by SSgt
an armed force policeman, a person
prehend you. Article 134. You were, on
or about 9 Feb 98, drunk and disorderly which conduct
was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the
9 Feb 98, wrongfully
armed forces. You
a threat by telling
communicate to SSgt.
him, to wit: "When I get through, I'm going to fucking
get you," or words to that effect. Reduction to Airman:
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
(2) 19 May 97, Langely AFB, VA - Article 111. You, did, on
or about 13 Apr 97, at Ward Road adjacent to the LTA
Pool, operate a motor vehicle, to wit: a passenger car,
while drunk. Suspended reduction to AB. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
e. Additional: Unknown.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (2) Yrs (7) Mos (24) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs ( 3 ) Mos (29) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 25 Oct 04.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
I+
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (X as appliceb/e) (Piease print name snd Social Security Number on each document.)
WUL NOT BE SUBMITIED. PLEASE COMPLETE RMM BASED ON AVAKABLE SERVlCE RECORDS.
ARE USTED BELOW AND ARE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION: (Contmue on a plain sheet of paper if mom space is needed.1
- , G .
'
',%
I
c. DOCUMENT 3:
8. ISSUES
The Board wiH consider any issue submitted by you prior to closing the case for deliberation. The Board will also review the case to
determine whether there are any issues that provide a basis for upgrading your discharge. However, the Board is not required to respond in
writing to issues of concern to you unless those issues are fisted or incorporated by specific reference below. Carefully read the instructions
that pertain to Block 8 prior to completing this part of the application. If you need more space, submit addition4 issues on an attachment.
I
H I HAM LSTED ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS AN ATTACHMENT TO THIS APPLICATON.
SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date1
I PR-Y
I
I THE ABOVE ISSUES SUPERSEDE A U PRNlWSLY SUBMITED.
I
9. CERTIFICATION
I make the foregoing statements as part of my apptication with full knowledge of the penalties involved for willfully making a false'
statement. U S . Code, Title 18, Section 1001, provides that en jt~dividuel shell be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 6 years,
or both.)
I Army Review B0erd3 Agency
Suppon Division, St. Louis
ATTN: SFMR-RBR-SL
9700 Page Avenue
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
Bldg. 36 - washington Navy Yard
... .. . ..C) ..-..-.. .--,.-
,901 fvl Street, S.E.
sAFmIB~
Commandant (WPM-GO)
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters
550-c Street West, Suite 40
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4742 Washington, DC 20593-0001
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00108
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used .J AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00108 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The applicant had further misconduct with a Vacation action for failure to go to appointed place of duty. On or about 8 Mar 00, you did, at or near Pope AFB NC, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your a ointed lace of duty, to wit: a...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00189
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. Applicant's Issues.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00135
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00135 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00360
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00360 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the DRB can establish an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I am requesting an upgrade of my discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0482
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER R)02-0482 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) MISSING DOCUMENTS 1. Prior Sv: (Examiner's Note) : The following service is extracted from DD Forms 214 due to missing enlistment or discharge documents) (1) USN AMS = 1 month 18 days.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00220
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0220 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. He also had six Letters of Reprimand and five Record of Individual Counseling for unsatisfactory performance, disrespectful attitude, missed appointments, late for duty, failure to use a seatbelt, failed room inspection, and dereliction of duty. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00146
In view of the foregoing findings the Board found no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 23D FIGHTER GROW (ACC) POPE AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA 28308 I o F E B ~ ~ , 2 3 AMXS MEMORANDUM FOR AIvQ FROM: 23 AMXSICC 286 Fortress Street Pope AFB, NC 28308 SUBJECT:...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00359
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIIMRER FD-2005-00359 GENEFIAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1 . (No appeal) (No mitigation) Additional: VBC, 5 MAR 03 - Counseled of the consequences of continued violations of Air...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0513
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlQNAL RATIONALE C A S P NllMHEK FD2002-0513 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and for a change in the RE Code and the Reason and Authority for discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) 1. On or about 16 Sep 98, at or near Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina, you, who h e w of your duties, were derelict in the performance of those...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00019
JRD FLOOR 4\DRL\\S AFB, 4411 211lfo2.7M2 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSIONAL RATIONALE CASE NlJMBER FD-20(,6-00019 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SrA) 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 6...