I 

i 
I 

1 

I 

- 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

1  Y 4MF: OF SFRVTrr; Mvnm""  -  ' ;T,  FIRST MIDL)LE 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 , )  

I 
~
I 
,

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 
X
~

~
I 
 
~
NAME OF COUNSEL ASU OR ORGANIZ4TION 
4 

~

~

:

Y

P

~
I  Nn 

T
- 
t
YES 

- 

GRADE 

I  AMN 
/ 

I 

I 

AFSNISSAN 

1 

I 

RECORDREVIEW 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION  OF COUNSEL 

MEMBER SITTING 

ISSUES  A94.06 

.  i' 

HEARING DATE 

-- 

- 

CASE NUMBER 

1  1  ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 
/  2  1  APPLICATION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
3  /  L E T E R  OF NOTIFICATION 
4  1  BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 

COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TLME OF 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 
1  TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

1 

I 

15 Nov 2005 
V P 1 I W S  1SJUt AND nil' RUMD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE UISCUSSED LW at.: ATliPCHQD AIR KHCE MSCW&GF  WlkW BOARD m S W N A L  RATIONAIE 
1  Case hcard at Washington, D.C. 
I 
1  Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR 

I 

I 1 Nanles and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. 
i 

1  SlGPiATUKE OF W.CORDER  , 

SIGNATURE OF B-QRRD  PRESIDENT 

- 

S.417MRBR 
5.50 (:  STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RASDOI.PH  AFB, 1X 781 i0-4741 

- 

SECRETARY OF TtlE AIK FORCE PERSONNEL COL'NCIL 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE RFVIEW B O A W  
I535 COMMAND DQ  EE WING. 3RD FLOOR 
ANDREWS  AFB, MD 20762-7002 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

I 

GENERAL:  The  applicant  appeals  for upgrade  of  discharge  to  honorable  and  to  change the  reason  and 
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment  code. 

The  applicant  appeared  and  testified  before  the  Di 
h d r e w s  AFB,  MD,  on  15 Nov  2005. 
applicant's behalf. 

view  Board  (DRB),  without  counsel,  at 
retired  USAF  TSgt,  also  testified  on  the 

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: 

Exhibit 6: Eighteen character letters 
Exhibit 7: Motor Vehicle Report dated 15 Nov 05 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  The  discharge  is  upgraded  to  honorable;  however,  change  of  reason  and  authority  for 
discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied.  The Board finds that neither the evidence of  record 
or  that  provided  by  the  applicant  substantiates  an  impropriety  that  would  justify  a  change  of  discharge. 
However,  based  upon  the  record  and  evidence  provided  by  the  applicant, the  Board  finds the  applicant's 
characterization of discharge inequitable. 

ISSUE:  Applicant received  a general discharge for a pattern of misconduct and conduct prejudicial  to good 
order and discipline. 

Applicant contends that he was treated unjustly in that his second Article  15 was his only improper act and 
caused the only instance in which he was in trouble during his entire stay at his permanent duty station 
(most of which was spent overseas), that he personally volunteered to extend his deployments so that others 
would have the opportunity to go home to their families, that some higher ranking individuals might have 
felt he was not a team player since he preferred to shy away from the politics/personal bias of his fellow 
soldiers, and that he was never late for, never compromised, and always completed missions he was 
assigned.  The records indicated  the applicant received two Article 15s, one for being drunk and disorderly 
while in Tech School, and the other for being incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties as a 
result of previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor within  12 hours of takeoff, and for being drunk and 
disorderly on another occasion, as well as one Letter of  Reprimand for failure to show.  Testimony revealed 
that applicant was deployed and volunteered the information that he did have one drink within 12 hours of 
the original takeoff time only after he learned that the alert time had been slipped due to mechanical 
problems; in fact, the flight was subsequently delayed for over 30 hours.  The drunk and disorderly charge 
stemmed from numerous deployed personnel taking part in some horseplay which testimony revealed was 
more or less standard fare during these deployments.  Testimony also revealed that member was returned to 
the CONUS after the drunk and disorderly incident and, for the next six months, flew only two missions 
(over the Christmas Holidays) due to a senior NCO in his chain of command refusing to put him on the 
flying schedule despite applicant never being officially DNIFed.  The Board took note of the excessive 
length of time it took to render the applicant the Article 15 upon his return to CONUS (approximately  4 
months) and that it was rendered by individuals who were not in the deployed location, as well as the fact 
that it took approximately 6 months to subsequently discharge him after his return to the CONUS. The Board 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of  the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

However,  in  view  of  the  foregoing  findings,  the  Board  further  concludes  that  the  overall  quality  of 
applicant's  service  is  more  accurately  reflected  by  an  Honorable  discharge,  and  that  the  applicant's 
characterization should be changed to Honorable under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553. 

Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  A I R   FORCE 

A I R   FORCE  DISCHARGE  REVIEW  BOARD 

ANDREWS  AFB,  MD 

(Former AMN)  (HGH AlC) 

1.  MATTER  UNDER  REVIEW:  Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Pope AFB, NC on 18 Jun 04 UP 
AFI 36-2308, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct -  Conduct Prejudicial to Good 
Order and Discipline).  Appeals for Honorable Discharge. 

2 .   BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 13 Sep 80. Enlmt Age: 20 10/12.  Disch Age: 23 9/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-81,  E-82,  G-80,  M-78. PAFSC: 1A231 - Aircraft Loadmaster 
Apprentice.  DAS: 31 Oct 02. 

b.  Prior Sv:  (1) AFRes 16 Jul 01 -  14 Nov 01  (03 mos 29 days)(Inactive). 

3 .  

SERVICE  UNDER  RFVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as Amn  15 Nov 01 for 4 years. Svd: 02 Yrs 07 Mo 04 Das, all 

AMS . 

b.  Grade Status:  Amn  -  23 Mar 04  (Article 15, 23 Mar 04) 

A1C -  15 Sep 02 
Examiner's Note:  Reduction to AB from Article 15 was 

never updated.  At the time, he was TDY enroute PCS and promotion 
automatically updated. 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15's:  (1) 23 Mar 04, Pope AFB, NC -  Article 134.  You were, at or 

near Amman, Jordan, on or about 14 Nov 03, as a result 
of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating 
liquor, incapacitated for the proper performance of your 
duites.  You, were, at or near A1 Udeid Air Base, Qatar, 
on or about 2 Dec 03, drunk and disorderly.  Article 92. 
You did, at or near Amman, Jordan, on or about 14 Nov 
03, violate a lawful general regulation, to wit: 
paragraph 3.32, AFI 11-2C130V3, dated 1 Apr 00, by 
wrongfully consuming alcoholic beverages within 12-hours 
of takeoff.  Reduction to the grade of Arm  and 
Reprimand.  (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation) 

(2) 18 Sep 02, Little Rock AFB, AR -  Article 134.  You 

were, on or about 23 Aug  02, drunk and disorderly which 
conduct was of a nature to bring discredit upon the 
armed forces.  Reduction to AB.  Thirty days 
correctional custody, suspended.  (No appeal) (No 
mitigation) 

e.  Additional: LOR, 10 MAR  04 -  Failure to go. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: 15 Nov 01 -  14 Jul 03  Pope AFB  4  (1nitial)REF 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AAM W/1 OLC, AM, NDSM. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS:  (02) Yrs  (11) Mos  (03) Das 
TAMS:  (02) Yrs (07) Mos  (04) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 15 Mar 05. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable) 

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. 

ATCH 
1.  Applications Issues. 
2.  Five Character References. 
3.  Personal Information Printout. 

May 5,2005 

To whom it may c o n c b .  

would like to relay the following events to you, the way I see them. I 
art with the Article 15 that resulted in a loss of Rank fiom A1 C to AMN 
and set in motion the chain of events that eventually ended in my discharge from the Air 
Force. The behavior that prompted the aforementioned Article 15 was my only improper 
act and caused the only instance in which I was in trouble during my entire stay at my 
permanent duty station. I was there for almost two years, most of which was spent 
overseas. I personally volunteered to extend my deployments every chance I got, so that 
others would have the opportunity go home to their families. I wasn't married and I would 
not be able to go home to see my parents in Seattle, so it seemed like the most logical, 
decent thing to do. On top pf that, I personally enjoyed flying the missions and competing 
in the weight lifting competitions. (Ali of which I won for my weight class). 

I think that some of the higher ranking individuals felt I was not a team player, but only 
because I preferred to shy away from the politics/personal bias of my fellow soldiers. 
While I was at Pope AFB I did notice a lot of favoritism and opportunities based on 
personal relations and not on performance and capability. Pope AFB was to be my first and 
last duty assignment in the Air Force. Following is my interpretation of the events that led 
to my discharge: 

Lrdczn 

1. On the day in question in Amm 
we w-ere scheduled to check out at 
bby and was the only one from my crew down 
approximately 03 15. I arrived do 
there.'I saw another aircrew down in the Iobby havYng"a few drinks. They had just arrived a 
short time earlier. This was the crew that brought in the MkI' (Mission Repair Team). I 
asked them if they had seen my crew, to which they replied that they had not and they had 
heard that I was not going to be leaving that day. They said the repairs would take far 
longer then one morning, and we would be looking at least another day. They then invited 
me to have a drink with them and stay awhile. 1 accepted. About a half an hour later I 
returned to my room. I called another member of my crew to convey how appreciative I 
was that I was the only one down in the lobby at 03 15.  It turned out the alert time was 
slipped to 0800 and I was not informed. I admit I was tired because I had already woken up 
for two alerts, but I was not drunk. I could have performed my duties as well as I had on all 
the other missions. It turns out it was my turn to b e  the secondary Loadmaster anyway, but 
I feel confident that I was of sound mind to act in any Loadmaster capacity. We had two 
Loadmasters for that particular mission and no cargo to unload or upload and none 
scheduled for pick up. That meant that I was basically a passenger with the Primary 
Loadmaster. I had informed my crew that they plane was not had not been fully repaired. 
When we got to the plane we confirmed that was the case. We ended up not leaving that 
day and left the following day, over 30 hours fiom the initial alert time. I later told Captain 
Messick that I showed up for the original time and no one was there and that I had Jack 
and Coke with the other crew. He then made a decision then that it was not a problem 
considering the facts of the matter. We both agreed that in the future it was better to wake 
up the Aircraft commander if there was ever any doubt again. That was the last I heard of 
this matter until I received an Article 15 for it state side. 

2. On the day in question at Alludeid AB, I had my allotted three beers. I was not out of 
control. My friends and I were having are own "worlds strongest man competition" just out 
side the "wagon wheel".  When it was my turn, I shot put a single sand bag so far it hit the 
side of the Persko tent. I was not throwing multiple sand bags and I was not trying to 
destroy or hurt anything or anyone. I then returned to my side of the base. That's when I 
walked into a tent where one of my fellow crewmen was hanging out. I was told half 
heatedly to just go sleep it off and that I was probably in trouble for the "sand bag thing". 
I finally agreed and started walking back to my tent. On my way back I saw MSgt Kelly, I 
always trusted him, so I thought him the appropriate person to give my small container of 
rum to. I had gotten the rum from another crew that was just trying to keep up moral. I 
figured if it had caused that much of a problem I wanted nothing to do with it. I voluntarily 
gave this to him. I just wanted to come clean about everything right then and there. If 
questioned I'm  sure he will convey these facts. I then went to sleep. Around 0600, I woke 

t to the bathroom, on the way back I encountered a very distraught MSgt 
as very poiite and courteous to him even though he would not let me speak. He 
e of going out to the chow hall, after I was ordered to go to bed. He had no 

proof. I then went back to sleep after he threatened to lock me up. I would have gone back 
to sleep without the threat. I was well within my time to start crew rest for a next mission if 
one would have come up. Crew rest is 12 hours officially but many crews know well in 
advance of their next mission. Most of the time we had 24 to 48 hours of down time 
between missions. 

Sirs, I ask that you further take into consideration that I had never been late for a mission. I 
had never compromised a mission and I had always completed the mission in which I had 
been given. I understand that I was at fault for all of these incidents, and I can do nothing 
now but look back with regret for what could have been a very promising Air Force career. 

I have almost given up on being a police officer or a firefighter due to the fact that I don't 
have an  honorable  discharge.  I  also had  a  promising  opportunity with  Halliburton, but 
when  I  sent  in  my  DD-214  they  systematically  cut  ties.  Border  Patrol  seemed  less 
enthusiastic with me  after they learned  about the less than  full honorable discharge. My 
DD-214 states that I have a "Pattern  of Misconduct".  To be honest I wouldn't  hire anyone 
with that either. 

% 

I sometimes feel like the time I spent flying missions supporting the war doesn't  matter to 
anyone.  That doesn't  make me any less proud  of  serving our  country,  it just  makes me 
wish I could go back and change some things. For all that I have done I am truly sorry, but 
I still believe that I was treated unjustly. I have included several character statements fiom 
people I served with.  These people believe that I was a good soldier and so do I. Thank 
you for your time. 

DEPARTMENT OF 'THE  AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS 43D AIRLIFT WING (AMC) 
POPE AIR FORCE BASE NORTH CAROLINA 

FROM:  2 ASICC 

SUBJECT:  Notification Memorandum 

1.  I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct:  A Pattern 
of Misconduct, Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline.  The authority for this action is 
AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2.  If my recommendation is approved, your service 
will be characterized as an Under Honorable Conditions (General) Discharge.  I am recommending 
that your service be characterized as an Under Honorable Conditions (General) ~ i s c h a r ~ e .  

2.  My reason for this action is: 

a.  On or about 14 Nov 03, at or near Amman, Jordan, as a result of wrongful previous 

overindulgence in intoxicating liquor, you were incapacitated for the proper performance of your 
duties, as documented by an AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudical Punishment Proceedings, dated 
23 Mar 04. 

b.  On or~about 14 Nov 03, you did, at or near Amman, Jordan, violate a lawful regulation, to 

wit:  paragraph 3.32, Air Force Instruction 11-2C130v3, dated  1 Apr 2000, by wrongfully 
consuming alcoholic beverages within 12 hours of takeoff, as documented by an AF Form 3070, 
Record of Nonjudical Punishment Proceedings, dated 23 Mar 04. 

c.  On or about 1 Mar 03, you failed to show for your Emergency Procedures Evaluation at your 

appointed place of duty, to wit:  building 738 at 0800, as documented by a Letter of Reprimand 
(LOR), dated 10 Mar 04. 

d.  On or about 23 Aug 02, at or near Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas, you were drunk 

and disorderly, which conduct was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, as 
documented by an AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudical Punishment Proceedings, dated 
18 Sep 02. 

3.  The 43d Airlift Wing Commander, who exercises SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authority, will 
decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force.  Copies of the documents to be 
forwarded to the Separation,Authority in support of this recommendation are attached. If you are 
discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force, and any special pay, bonus, or 
education assistance funds may be subject to recoupment. 

4.  Military legal counsel may be obtained to assist you.  Contact SS 
2362) at the Area Defense Counsel's office, at that time an appointment will be scheduled for 
you to consult the Area Defense Counsel.  You may consult civilian counsel at your own 

(extension 4- 

expense.  The Air Force does not pay expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel. 
Civilian counsel, if employed, must be readily available. 

5.  You have the right to submit a statement in your behalf.  Any statements you want the 

Separation Authority to consider must reach me by a&&  at dqm unless you request and 

receive an extension for good cause shown.  Any submitted statements will be forwarded to the 
Separation Authority. 

6.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your behalf in three days, your failure 
will constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

7.  You have been scheduled for a physical examination.  Report to the Pope AFB Family Practice 
Clinic on  3m%,d at  0930 
screening. 

hours.  In addition, report to the Lab ASAP to receive HTV 

8.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy 
of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at http://www.e-publishing.af.miV. 

9.  Execute the attached acknowledment and return it to me imrnediatelv. 

Commander 

Attachments: 
1.  AF Form 3070, dated 23 Mar 04 (3 pgs) 
2.  Written Presentation to AF Form 3070, dated 22 Mar 04 
3.  Written Presentation to AF Form 3070, dated 27 Mar 04 
4.  LOR, dated 10 Mar 04 
5.  AF Form 3070, dated 18 Sep 02 (3 pgs) 
6.  Receipt of Notification Memorandum 

I 

AIR FORCE DISCIIARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME O F  SERVICE MEMBER (1 . A R T ,  FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

TYPE GEN 
CVNSEC 

I 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 

- I 

I 

MEMBER SITTING 

ISSUES  A92.35 
I 

I 

.,.dEY  NUMBER 

A67.50 

I  HEALING DATE- 
)  06 Dec 2005 
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DlSClJSSED ON THF:  ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

- -   - 

I 

I 

COUNSEL'S  RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME O F  
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

I  TAPE RECORDWG O F  PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

I 

Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to 
submit an application to the AFBCMR. 

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's  request. 

I -- 

TO: 

--- 

INDORSEMENT 

- 

SAFIMRBR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742 

I 

1 

- 

- 

DATE:  lU612005 

- 

-- 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL 
AIR FORCt DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 
1535 COhlhMND D R  LI: WIWC.  3RD FI.OOR 
ANDREWS  AFB. ~~'20762-7002' 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

I 

1  AFSNISSAN 

I 

IX 
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL 

RECORDREVIEW 

I 

/ON  1 

VOTE O F  THE B O W   ; 3' ;.' 
I  DENY 

I  OTHER 

I  UOTHC 

GEN 

I 

I 

~ 2 3 0 + G & - $ 2 i ' ~ ' c ~  

I 

I 

,

I

EXHIBITS S U B ~ I M S D ~ ] ~ ~  

1  I  ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 
1  2  /  APPLICATION  FOR REVIEW O F  DISCHARGE 
'  3  1  LETTER OF NOTIFlCATlON 
4  )  BRIEF OF PERSONNEL  FILE 

 

I 
I 

+ 

] 
I 

I 
I 

1 

I 

I 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2004-00451 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. 

The applicant was offered a personal  appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied. 

The  Board  finds  that  neither  the  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  the  applicant  substantiates  an 
inequity or impropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

ISSUE:  The  applicant  stated  that  his  discharge  was  based  on  one  isolated  incident  in  27  months  of 
otherwise exemplary service.  The records indicated the applicant received  two  Articles  15, and  a Special 
Court-martial  for  misconduct.  The  misconduct  included  driving  under  the  influence  on  two  separate 
occasions, resisting  arrest, drunk  and disorderly and communicating  a threat  to a  law enforcement  officer. 
1  The Special Court-martial found the applicant guilty of failing to obey a lawful order not to operate a motor 
vehicle  while  on  Langley  AFB,  Virginia.  The  Board  found  that  the  seriousness  of  that  misconduct 
outweighed the applicant's  otherwise satisfactory service.  The characterization  of the discharge received by 
the applicant was found to be appropriate. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive  requirements  of  the  discharge regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of  the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 

(Former AB)  (HGH A1C) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd  a GEN Disch fr Langley AFB, VA on 26 Jun 98. 
UP AFI 36-3208  (Misconduct.  Appeals  for Honorable Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 17 Mar 75.  Enlmt Age: 20 7/12.  Disch Age: 23 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-Unknown,  E-Unknown,  G-Unknown,  M-Unknown. PAFSC: 2A331B -  F- 
15/Flll Avionics Systems Apprentice.  DAS: Unknown. 

b.  Prior Sv:  (1) AFRes  3 Nov  95 -  28 Feb 96 (3 months 26 days) (~nactive) . 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 29 Feb 96 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 3 Mo 29 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  Amn -  17 Mar 98  (Art 15, 17 Mar 98) 

A1C -  Unknown. 
Amn  -  Unknown. 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art  15's:  (1) 17 Mar  98, Langely AFB, VA -  Article 95.  You did, on 

or about 9 Feb 98, resist being apprehended by SSgt 
an armed force policeman, a person 

prehend you.  Article 134.  You were, on 

or about 9 Feb 98, drunk and disorderly which conduct 
was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the 
9 Feb 98, wrongfully 
armed forces.  You 
a threat by telling 
communicate to SSgt. 
him, to wit: "When I get through, I'm going to fucking 
get you," or words to that effect.  Reduction to Airman: 
(No appeal)  (No mitigation) 

(2) 19 May  97, Langely AFB, VA -  Article 111.  You, did, on 

or about 13 Apr 97, at Ward Road adjacent to the LTA 
Pool, operate a motor vehicle, to wit: a passenger  car, 
while drunk.  Suspended reduction to AB.  (No appeal)  (No 
mitigation) 

e.  Additional: Unknown. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: None. 

h.  Awards  &  Decs:  AFTR, AFOUA. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS:  (2) Yrs  (7) Mos  (24) Das 
TAMS:  (2) Yrs  ( 3 )  Mos  (29) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 25 Oct 04. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable) 

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. 

ATCH 
1. Applicant's  Issues. 

I+ 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (X as appliceb/e) (Piease print name snd Social Security Number on each document.) 

WUL NOT BE SUBMITIED.  PLEASE COMPLETE RMM  BASED ON AVAKABLE SERVlCE RECORDS. 

ARE  USTED BELOW AND ARE ATTACHED TO THIS  APPLICATION: (Contmue on a plain sheet of paper  if mom space is needed.1 

- , G .  

' 

',% 

I 

c.  DOCUMENT 3: 

8.  ISSUES 

The Board wiH consider any issue submitted by you prior to closing the case for deliberation.  The Board will also review the case to 

determine whether there are any issues that provide a basis for upgrading your discharge.  However, the Board is not required to respond in 
writing to issues of concern to you unless those issues are fisted or incorporated by specific reference below.  Carefully read the instructions 
that pertain to Block 8 prior to completing this part of the application.  If you need more space,  submit addition4 issues on an attachment. 

I 

H I HAM LSTED ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS AN  ATTACHMENT TO THIS APPLICATON. 

SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date1 

I PR-Y 

I 

I THE ABOVE ISSUES SUPERSEDE A U  PRNlWSLY SUBMITED. 

I 

9.  CERTIFICATION 

I make the foregoing statements as part of my apptication with full knowledge of the penalties involved for willfully making a false' 

statement.  U S .  Code,  Title 18, Section  1001, provides that en jt~dividuel shell be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 6 years, 
or both.) 

I Army Review  B0erd3 Agency 

Suppon Division, St.  Louis 
ATTN:  SFMR-RBR-SL 
9700 Page Avenue 

Naval Council of Personnel Boards 
Bldg. 36 - washington Navy Yard 
...  ..  .  ..C)  ..-..-.. .--,.- 
,901 fvl  Street,  S.E. 

sAFmIB~ 
Commandant (WPM-GO) 
U.S.  Coast Guard Headquarters 
550-c  Street West,  Suite 40 
Randolph AFB,  TX  78150-4742  Washington,  DC  20593-0001