Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600331
Original file (MD0600331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD06-00331

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20051212 . The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ misconduct. ” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20061025 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, impropriety in the narrative reason for the Applicant ’s discharge was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the reason for discharge shall change to: HONORABLE/ HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION , authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 62 07 , Separation Code “ HRB1 . ”



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant ’s issues, as stated on the application and from an attached letter to the Board:
“ I belive a reason for an upgrade or change is it does not reflect my lifestyle, nor will it ever. Other issues that I would like to be addressed, is my separation code to be changed to a misconduct. Also my reentry code to be changed to one that would help me for re-enlistment. ”

“ To Whom-It May Concern:

 My name is J_ S_ (Applicant) , I am requesting your assistance with me being eligi ble for re - enlistment into the armed for c es. In order for me to be allowe d for re -e nlistment my re-entry code would have to be changed. A l so, my separation code and my narrativ e rea s on for separatio n a nd anything else that w ould keep me from reenlistment. The reason I believe I need these codes changed is from recently speaking w ith military recruiters about possible rentry into the military.

During my initial enlistment into the Marine Corps, I made a mi stake that has followed me to th is date. I w a s much younger then and did not understand the effects what this mistake wo ul d cause. At the time I stated that I was bi - sexua l . I was looking for only one thing and that was to return ho me. I was dealing with the death of my father a n d a foot injury that removed me from my unit. I was very confused at that time and I did not make a rational dec ision. My stat ement regarding being bi - sexual was incorrect and does not reflect my true lifestyle. It was a statement to expedite my return home to help comfort my mother.
Also, during my initial enlistment, I did make some good decisions. I worked hard to be the few and the proud, and had a n outstanding P F T score, graduated as honor graduate out of W.P.N.S. school, received a meritorious promotion and a certificate of commendation.

Since my discharge from the Marine Corps I have struggled with my action, but I have strived to make my life meaningful and have been continually employed in a full time basis and b een an active member of the church. The shock of my father’s death is behind me and I have learned to live w i th those types of things in a mature manner and wish to re -enter into the military at a time when our country is engaged in a war on terrorism. I believe that I can contribute in a positiv e manner and I can only ask that I be allowed the chance to prove that I am a much dif ferent person.

R espectfully,
J_ S_ (Applicant)
[signed]”

Applicant’s Remarks: (Taken from the DD Form 293.)

“I J_ S_ (Applicant), is mailing you this form and sending you these letter’s, cause I want a second chance.
Please review my case carefully and allow me this chance to serve my country when it is in need.
Thank you
J_ S_ (Applicant)”

 Documentation
In addition to the service and medical record s , the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant , was considered:
Character Reference ltr from T_ Z. C_, dtd June 11, 2005
 Character Reference ltr from D_ B_, dtd June 1, 2005
Character Reference ltr from S_ J. M_, dtd September 2, 2004
 HQMC l etter to The Honorable D_ D_, Member, U.S. House of Representatives regarding Applicant’s re-enlistment code , dtd July 20, 2004
 Applicant ’s Certificate of Commendation, dtd April 30, 1998
 Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19971112 - 19971117       COG
         Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19971118              Date of Discharge: 19990924

Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 0 1 1 0 07
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 1 9

Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 45

Highest Rank: LCpl                                   MOS: 0351

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 ( 5)                                Conduct: 4.1 ( 5 )
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Rifle Marksman Badge, Certificate of Commendation, Letter of Appreciation


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
HONORABLE/HOMOSEXUAL ACT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6207.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990823 :  Applicant informs 1stSgt M_ G_, Jr., USMC, Company First Sergeant that Applicant told the Regimental Chaplain on 990820 that Applicant was bi-sexual.
          [Extracted from 1stSgt M_ G_, Jr., USMC statement dtd 990831.]

 990823:          Medical entry: Regimental Aid Station, (not signed, caregiver not identified) : Patient ( Applicant ) was sent here by his unit 1 st Sergeant for medical evaluation after he revealed himself as “bisexual”. Patient admitted he engaged in bisexual interaction but not with his friends in the Marine Corps.
         Patient is alert, oriented and cooperative. He is in clean military uniform. Good eye contact. Normal speech. Thought process is logic and linear. Mood is “better” that he made it to an open but “worried” of what will happen to him and military career. Denies suicidal or homicidal ideation/thoughts.
99 0830:  Commanding Officer, 3 rd Marines (Rein), appoints Major B_ K. B_ to conduct preliminary inquiry into the circumstances surrounding Applicant’s homosexual statement.
990831 :  Applicant acknowledges to Major B_ K. B_ that Applicant did tell the Regimental Chaplain and 1stSgt G_ that the Applicant was bi-sexual; that Applicant stood by those statements; and that Applicant did have a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts.

990907:  Major B_ K. B_ submits report of preliminary inquiry. Finds that Applicant voluntarily told 1stS gt G_ that Applicant was bi-sexual. Opines that Applicant was sincere and is likely to engage in homosexual conduct. Recommends administrative separation.
990913 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of homosexual conduct with a characterization of service as honorable . Applicant informed the least favorable character of service possible was as general (under honorable conditions).

990913 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

990913 :  Commanding Officer, 3d Marines (Rein), Marine Corps Base Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii , recommended Applicant ’s discharge by reason of homosexual conduct with a characterization of service as honorable. The factual basis for this recommendation was statement that demonstrates a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts. Commanding Officer’s comments: “ The respondent’s actio ns clearly indicate unsuitability for future military service; therefore, I recommend that the Respondent be expeditiously discharge. ”
990915 :  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 990916:   GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii , directed the Applicant 's discharge by reason of homosexual conduct with a characterization of service as honorable .

990917:  Applicant found medically qualified for separation.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19990924 by reason of homosexual conduct - act (A) with a service characterization of honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was equitable (B) but im proper in regards to the narrative reason for discharge ( C ).

The Applicant contends that he was not and is not a homosexual and admitted to being a bi-sexual for the sole purpose of obtaining a discharge from the Marine Corps. Per reference (A), the Applicant’s in-service statement to his First Sergeant that he was a bi-sexual created a rebuttable presumption that he engaged in, attempted to engage in, had the propensity to engage in, or intends to engage in homosexual acts. The Applicant did not submit any evidence to rebut this presumption prior to his discharge. The inquiry initiated following the Applicant’s admission determined that his statement was sincere. The statement contained in the application that the Applicant’s admission was due to being younger and not understanding the effects of this “mistake” was found to be insufficient justification to warrant a change in the reason for discharge to misconduct. However, the Board did determine that Applicant was notified of the recommendation for discharge on the basis of a homosexual statement, not a homosexual act; and further determined that the evidence in the record was insufficient to support a determination that the Applicant had engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts in violation of applicable law or policy. Therefore, the Board concluded that the Applicant’s narrative reason for separation should have been for homosexual admission, not homosexual act. Partial relief on this basis is granted.

The NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces. Therefore, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 1995 until 31 Aug 2001, Paragraph 6207, HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600582

    Original file (MD0600582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970627 by reason of homosexual conduct - admission (A) with a service characterization of honorable. The Board found that the Applicant’s post-service conduct was sufficiently creditable to warrant a change to his narrative reason for separation. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00862

    Original file (MD04-00862.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01445

    Original file (ND03-01445.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01445 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030909. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. However, they encouraged her and stated that if she had some time in the military and preferably in the military police, her acceptance into the Sheriffs Dept.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600015

    Original file (ND0600015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. The NDRB has no authority to provided additional review of this case since Applicant’s discharge occurred more than 15 years ago.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01239

    Original file (MD04-01239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500445

    Original file (MD0500445.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 000929: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from appointed place of duty.Awarded forfeiture of $502.00 per month for 2 months, 30 days restriction and extra duties for 45 days. ]021006: Applicant received Original Notification of Separation Proceedings dtd 020920, Acknowledgement of Rights form and the Purpose and Scope of the Navy Discharge Review Board and Board for Correction of Naval Records form. The Applicant’s conduct,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600672

    Original file (MD0600672.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Private First Class B_ (Applicant) has stated to HM2 H_, “That I have no desire to return to the unit and remain in the Marine Corps.” HM2 P_ had told Private First Class B_ (Applicant) the way to correct his deficiencies through his chain of command and that if he did not then a list of consequences was given to him under the references (a) and (b). Private First Class B_ (Applicant) did not show up for the May drill and was given Unexcused for those drills. It is requested that Private...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501420

    Original file (MD0501420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). After I told the men in my command that I had taken the drugs. The NDRB advises that there was no impropriety in his administrative separation for misconduct due to drug abuse, despite the evidence of record showing that the Applicant’s test result came back negative for controlled substances.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501410

    Original file (ND0501410.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“APPLICANT REQUESTS AN UPGRADE OF DISCHARGE FROM “GENERAL, UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS” TO “HONORABLE.” APPLICANT INTENDS TO RE-ENLIST, SERVE TWO YEARS ON ACTIVE DUTY AND THEN COMPLETE EIGHT YEAR INITIAL TERM ENLISTMENT AS INTENDED.” The names, and votes of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501044

    Original file (ND0501044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I WAS TOLD THAT I COULD NOT LONGER SEE HER DURING CAPTAIN’S MAST AND A SUSPENDED BUST FOR 6 MONTHS AND FINED $1,000 FOR 2 MONTHS. Furthermore, both B_ E_ and her father verified the ongoing relationship in their statements and J_ A_ O_ provided 2 additional statements documenting the ongoing relationship between the Applicant and the lady whom he was ordered to stop seeing.