Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00386
Original file (FD2004-00386.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
I 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

/  GRADE 

/  AFSNISSAN 

1 

, .............................. 
ISSUES  A94.06 
A91.54 

I 
1  C 4 S E  h C M B E R  
I  FD-2004-00386 

HEARIYG DATE 

28 Dec 2004 

/  Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise appiicant of the decision ofthe Board. 

2  1  APFLICAT!Oh'  FOR &?VIEW  OF DISCHARGE 
3  i  LETTER  OF NOTIFICATION 
4 
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL  FILE 

/  COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXH!BITS  SUBMIT'I.ED  A7 TIME OF 
PERSONAL APPEAR4NCE 

LAPE RECORDING OF PERSONA!.  APPEARANCE 
 

1 

1
/ 

I-- 
/ 
I 
1
1 

1 

I 

.". 

SAF!?dR8R 

5%  C STREET N'ET W UITE 40 

RA1\DO1-PH AFR, TX 7781504742 

.  ... 

SECRETARY OF THE .AIR FORCE PIRSOY\FL  COUVCU 
ACR  FORCE DISCBARGE RE\?EW  90.&RD 
IS35 COMMAXO DR.  tE \ILYG,  3 W  *LOOR 
ANDREIVS  AB3. MB 20761-7001 

AFtIQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V3) 

Previous edition will be used 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00480

    Original file (FD2005-00480.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's discharge was too harsh and approved an upgrade of discharge to General. Specification: In that ss9t : ......................... :, ' USAF, 11 CS, Bolling AFB, DC, who knew or should have known of her duties within the continental US, on divers occasions, between on or about 16 Jul 2004 and on or about 23 Jul 2004, was derelict in the 1 2 DEC - . APPLICANT DATA (The p m n whose discharge is...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00465

    Original file (FD2005-00465.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. should be discharged with an 1 . should be discharged with a general service characterization because he has had enough chances and time to improve sufficiently to meet Air Force standards.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00258

    Original file (FD2005-00258.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I'X 781 50-4742 FROM: SECRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COlJNClL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ' ANOREWS AFB. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Seymour Johnson AFB, NC on 17 Dec 04 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline). You did, at or near Seymour Johnson AFB, NC, between on or about 1 Feb 02 and on or about 22 Mar 02, steal a box of aircraft warning streamers, of a value...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00288

    Original file (FD2004-00288.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    a - 1 NARIE OF SERVICE MERIBER (LAST, FIRST RllDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I ] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION I LTCOL I ( X I ( I RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGAhlZATlON OF COUNSEL - 1 I I I MEMBER SITTING I t- HON VOTE OF THE BOARD -- GEN I 1 UOTHC O T H E R ~ DENY X - ISSUES A94.05 - - INDEX NUhlBER A70.00 HE4RlNG DATE' 1 C A S E N U M B E R 1 2 3 4 I 1 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I ORDER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00432

    Original file (FD2005-00432.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Pattern of Misconduct--Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline and Condition that Interferes with Military Service--Mental Disorder Applicant did not submit any issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge, but did submit that the characterization of his discharge has prevented him from obtaining federal and contracting jobs. Bases for Discharge: A1 C \ -------- :misconduct and his diagnosed mental disorder make him...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00203

    Original file (FD2006-00203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00203 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The record indicates the applicant received six Records of Individual Counseling for being late for work--three times, failure to obey direct order, failure to meet standards, and abuse of government vehicle; four Letters of Reprimand for being late for work and failure to go; and an Article 15 for driving under the influence of alcohol and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00120

    Original file (FD2006-00120.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL KATIONALE CASL N l l M R F R FD-2006-UU120 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. The records indicated thc applicant received two Letters of Reprimand and was found guilty of three charges by a Special Court Martial for misconduct. (Atch 2) c. On 29 Nov 2004, you were convicted in a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00282

    Original file (FD2004-00282.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    , , HON I : . ~ o ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ $ ; ~ ; i j $ $ g ; ; $ & ~ $ ~ g G E N 'UOTHC DENY ,,,,. '~, 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 3 4 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTmCAllON BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TOTHE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHlBrrS SUBMIlTED AT T M E OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I =?.,.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00236

    Original file (FD2004-00236.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    YAME-OF SERVlCE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST RllDDLE INITIAL) r G W D E AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE GEN I / YES C O U N s E ~ I No X PERSONAL APPEARANCE ] i NAME b~ COUNSEL nrw OR ORGANIZATION I I MEMBER SITTING I J ISSUES A01.02 INDEX NUMBER AO1.O1 SRA 1 I RECORDKEVIEW X I ,\namss AND on ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL I I YOTE. OF THE BOARD I 1 X X X X X 1 2 3 4 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00112

    Original file (FD2005-00112.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SrA) 1. If you chose to not consult with counsel, then take no actions regarding an appointment with legal.