INDEX NUMBER
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCEARGE REVIEW BOARD
153s COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD PLOOR
ANDREWS AEB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
. .,
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03621
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, line 10(b) is marked YES, as the disability did occur during a time of war in the line of duty. What the Air Force is telling him is that in no way an Air Force member can have a combat-related injury if they were medically retired and entered the Air Force prior to the date indicated on the form. DPPD states the...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00091
The Air Force Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found him unfit for continued service with a combined rating of 10% for 6100 asymmetrical hearing loss, mild on the right and moderate on the left using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force regulations. Using an evaluation done two months after separation from the Air Force, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated his hearing loss at 0% under VASRD code 6100 and also rated 6260 Tinnitus...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0494
f AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AlC AR X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN, UOTHC | OTHER DENY ~~ ISSUES INDEX NUMBER Au A93.17, A92.21, A92.37 A66.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 03-05-21 FD2002-0454 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00828
Therefore, it was Professional Military Education (PME) at the right level at the right time, and should have been displayed in the Officer Selection Brief (OSB). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that he was in the last year group of majors allowed to enroll in Air War College (AWC) via correspondence or seminar. All through his career the Air...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0083
The legal review of the recommended discharge and the separation authority’s letter directing execution of the discharge action are also missing from the record. You must consult legal counsel before making a decision to walve any of your rights. In addition to mifitary counsel, you have the right to employ civllian counsel.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00621
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00621
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0190
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD00-0339 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FDO1-00190 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) 1. Reference Letter of Counseling dated 11 Mar 92.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00065
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00065 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Background Information: The respondent has more than six years military service, therefore he is entitled to an administrative discharge board hearing. Based on the respondent’s record, a General discharge is appropriate when characterizing the respondent’s overall service record and drug abuse.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00894
In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of a Department of Veterans Administration (DVA) reconsideration decision; his Certificate of Service documentation, Proceedings of Army Retiring Board for Officers, a letter from his state Senator with attachment, and a letter from the Army Review Board Agency. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed in the 1973 fire at the...