MEMBER SITTING
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
SECRETARY OF TEE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE R E W BOARD
1533 COMMAND D R EE WING. 3RO FLOOR
ANDREWS ARB, MD 20762-7002
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the ‘“application be denied (Exhibit C) . Requested Action. The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant the stated reason for...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00052
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) .--------------------. If she can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising her right to make a personal appearance before the Board. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00075
01/03/13/ia D E P A R T M E N T O F ':ti€ r,;R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S E l G t l T H A I R F O R C E ( A C C ) B A R K S D A L E AIR F O R G E B A S E , L O U I S I A N A ommendation to Involuntarily Discharge Airman Basi 384 MSSQ, McConnell Air Force Base TO: 8AFKXP 8 AFKC IN TURN scharge action has been initiated against Airman Basic Squadron, McConnell Air Force Base, for a pattern o red an unconditional waiver of his right to an administrative r, 384th Bomb Wing, recommends...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00031
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The DRB recognized the applicant was 19 years of age when the discharge took place. d. On 10 Mar 86, you received an Article 15 for fail to go.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00325
AIR FORCE DlSCllARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR EE WING, 3RD F1.00H ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will he used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL KATIONAIAE CASE NUMBER FD-2(,(,5-0(,325 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The n~isconduct included leaving his post without authority, failure to obey a lawful order, civil arrest for speeding, driving under the influence of alcohol, dereliction of duty,...