I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AFSNlSSAN
GEN
C O U ~ Z j S ~ i 9 ' " + ~ ; NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
YES
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I NO
X RECORDREVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANlZATlON OF COUNSEL
I
I
MEMBERS SITTING
I
HEARING DATE
25 JULY 03
I
CASE NUMBER
FD2003-00 153
I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE B O W S DECISIONAL RATlONAL A N DBQISSEDON THE A ' I T T A$R
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
I
I
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
/ TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL A P P E W C E HEARING
I
Q;IS@ARGE RKVlEW BOARDDECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
SAFMIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used.
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD2003-00153
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of di'scharge is denied.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any.
Issues. Applicant was discharged for conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. He had an Article
15, two Letters of Reprimand, and an Unfavorable Information File. His misconduct included failing to pay
just debts, misuse of his government travel card, and failure to pay the balance of the resultant debt. At the
time of the discharge, member consulted counsel and waived his right to submit statements in his own
behalf. The Board noted member was given several opportunities to correct his behavior but was either
unwilling or unable to do so. Member was age 25 and 26 when his misconduct occurred, the same age as
other airmen who honorably complete their service without misconduct. There was no evidence he was
immature, or didn't know right from wrong. The Board determined member was responsible for his actions
and was held accountable for them because his misconduct was disruptive to the unit. The Board did not
find sufficient mitigation to warrant an upgrade, and no inequity or impropriety was found in this discharge
in the course of the records review.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH SRA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 17 Oct 96 UP AFI 36-
3208, para 5.50.2 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and
Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2 . BACKGROUND :
a. DOB: 27 Aug 70. Enlmt Age: 22 11/12. Disch Age: 26 1/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-68, E-49, G-53, M-65. PAFSC: 2A634 - Aircraft Fuels Systems
Apprentice. DAS: 25 Mar 96.
b . Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 13 Aug 93 - 16 Nov 93 (3 Months 4 Days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enld as A1C 17 Nov 93 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 11 Mos 1 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - 18 Sep 96 (Article 15, 18 Sep 96)
SRA - Unknown
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 18 Sep 96, Seymour Johnson AFB, NC - Article 134. You,
being indebted to American Express in the amount of
$2,886.71 for goods, service and/or lawful currency
received, which amount became due and payable between on
or about 1 Jun 96, and ori or about 1 Sep 96, did, from
on or about 15 Jul 96 to on or about 4 Sep 96,
dishonorably fail to pay said debt. Reduction to A1C.
(Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation).
e. Additional: LOR, 19 JUN 96 - Misuse of American Express government
LOR, 12 FEB 96 - Financial irresponsibility.
card.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 17 Nov 93 - 16 Jul 95 RAF Mildenhall 5 (Initial)
17 Jul 95 - 04 Feb 96 RAF Mildenhall 5 (CRO)
(Discharged from Seymour Johnson AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA W/2 DEV.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (3) Yrs (2) Mos (5) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (11) Mos (1) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 30 Mar 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.
ATCH
None.
13 Jun 03/cr
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
4TH FIGHTER WING (ACC)
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE NC
/ c @ L ? ~ ~ . ? - 0 8 ) < 3
MEMORAIVDUM FOR AI C
,
4 CRS
~
FROM: 4 CRSICC
'L
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1 . I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct, specifically, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The authority for
my recommendation is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, section H, paragraph
5.50.2. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable
or general. I am recommending your service be characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. Between on or about 1 Aug 95 and on or about 6 Feb 96, while stationed at RAF
Mildenhall, England, you were delinquent in your rent payments in the total amount of $769.50
pounds, as evidenced by a letter of reprimand, and an unfavorable information file action, both
dated 12 Feb 96, with supporting documents (atch la).
b. On or about 30 Mar 96, you misused your Government American Express card, as evidenced
by a letter of reprimand dated 19 Jun 96 (atch lb).
c. Between on or about. 1 Jun 96 and on or about 1 Sep 96, you were delinquent in your
payments to your Government American Express account in the total amount of $2,886.71, as
evidenced by an Article 15 dated 24 Sep 96, with supporting documents (atch lc).
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you
are discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be
ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. I
have made an a;;pointment for you to consult the Area Defense Counsel, duty phone 5336,
on ^/ 6 4 - 96 at 0900
, in bldg 3601. You may consult civilian counsel at year
own expense.
5. You have the right to submit statements in your Q X ~ I
the separation authority to consider n ~ e z ~ h
A:;;. ztatements you want
me by 9 0~f96 (3 workdays) unless you
request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation
authority.
6. If you fail to consult counsel or submit statements in your behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You were previously scheduled for a mandatory medical examination, at the Physical
Examination Section, 4th Medical Group, Seymour Johnson AFB, at 07~5 hours on
9 d'cf96
hours on /7Uc-wb at Family Practice.
,and at &@
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974.
A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your Orderly Room.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Commander, 4 CRS
Attachments:
1 . Suppoging docun~ents:
a. LOR/UIF, 12 Feb 96
wlsupporting documents
b. LOR, 19 Jun 96
c. Article 1 SIUIF, 24 Sep 96
2. Receipt of Notification Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00150
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with thc procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 5 Apr 89 - 16 Nov 89 (7 months 12 days) (~nactive) . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: eenlisted as SrA 24 Feb 9 b. Grade Status: AB - 5 Oct 94 (Article 15, 5 Oct 94) c. Time Lost: None.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00251
JRD FLOOR ANDK&\VS AFR, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00251 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Article 15 was administered for failure to obey a lawful order to remain in Parachute Room 1 and stealing $80.00, the property of a non-commissioned officer. Because applicant's discharge file was unavailable to the Board for review, the...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00063
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Letter of Reprimand for misconduct during his time of service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other information contained in the records. Article 15, dtd 14 Jan 94 w Atch’s
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00161
During this time, the applicant's commander inappropriately used hearsay and opinion in a letter he wrote to the Medical Evaluation Board. S E R V I C E UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 26 Sep 94 for 6 yrs. Medical Board Review.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00308
In addition, he received a Letter of Reprimand, twelve Records of Individual Counseling and two Letters of Admonishment for financial irresponsibility, violation of Tech Data, dereliction of duty, violation of AFOSH Standards, failure to perform tool box inspection, failure to properly inspect vehicle, late for duty, substandard workmanship, and for dress and appearance violations. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB,...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00074
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. He had two Letters or Records of Individual Counseling, five Letters of Reprimand, an Article 15, and an Unfavorable Information File. For your misconduct, you received a Letter of Reprimand, dated 7 April 1999.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00396
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation, four Letters of Reprimand, a Letter of Admonishment and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. The applicant had further misconduct and received an Article 15 and Vacation for failure to go to appointed place of duty on three separate occasions and failure to wear Chef Whites while perfomling duties at the dining facility. For your misconduct, you received a Record of Individual Counseling dated, 30...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0001
ae CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0001 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, specifically for minor disciplinary infractions.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00155
He was administratively disciplined for drug abuse; being late for work; failure to obey a dircct order; dereliction of duty; disobeying lawful orders; failure to go; abandoned post; sleeping on duty; failure to comply with shaving standards; and failure to meet uniform standards. On 26 March 2001, you were derelict in your duties by failing to meet Air Force dress and appearance standards, as evidenced by AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 26 March 200 1. c. On 18 April...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00232
The applicant's records reveal medical issues, which if known by the separation authority at the time of the applicant's discharge, could have led to a different conclusion concerning characterization of the applicant's service. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) FD2003-00232 1. For this offense you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 29 Mar 96 with an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) entry.