-
I AFSNISSAN
I GRADE
AB
l i
-
.
TYPE
YES
I NO
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIJlDLE INITIAL)
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
X RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBERS SITTING
9
' cS rr
WON
I GEN
I UOTtfC
I OTHER
] DENY
ISSUES
A94.05
MDEX NUMEIER
A67.90
I
I
HEARING DATE
6 MAY 03
CASE NUMBER
FD2002-0439
I
I
I
'
I
I
I ,
I
~
I
~
. S ~ i t l r r ~ + $
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
TBE'BW
I
~
M
O
T
I
2
( 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I I TAPE RECORDWG OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
f
x
I
m
ISSUE AND THE B O W S W S l O W @ i l
~
S
I
I
A
P
~
%
I
3
I
REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
SAFIMIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 1504742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
SECRETARY OF T I E AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
4
Previous edition will be used.
c
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD02-0439
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety, which would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant contends that his discharge was too harsh because the Article 15 he received for being
AWOL was due to a broken down car. The record indicates the applicant received two Article's 15. The
first one for being AWOL for three days and the second one for wrongfully using his government charge
card for purposes other than official government travel. He also received three Letters of Counseling for
not returning to work after an appointment, being derelict in the performance of his duty and for being late
for work. The applicant indicates that he was stuck in Savannah Georgia for the weekend during the period
of 26 May 98 through 29 May 98. However, the second Article 15 he received indicates that he used his
government credit card in Houston Texas and in Savannah Georgia during that same time frame. If he can
provide additional documented infomation to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider
exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If he should choose to exercise this
right to a personal appearance hearing, the applicant should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual
evidence of the inequity and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to
the community. The Board found no evidence of any inequity or impropriety on which to base a decision to
upgrade the discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH AMN)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 9 SEP 98 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.50.2 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline).
Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 24 Mar 76. Enlmt Age: 20 9/12. Disch Age: 2 2 5/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-67, E-68, G-82, M-57. PAFSC: 2W131F - Munitions Systems
Apprentice. DAS: 2 0 Nov 97.
b. Prior S v : (1) AFRes 17 Jan 97 - 20 May 97 (4 months 4 days) (Inactive)
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 21 May 97 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yr 3 Mos 20 Days, al1,AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB -' 17 Aug 98 (Article i5, 14 Aug 98)
AMN - 21 NOV 97
c. Time Lost: None.
d .
Art 15's: (1) 14 Aug 98, Moody AFB, GA - Article 9 2 . You, did, at or
near Houston, Texas, and or Savannah, Georgia, on divers
occasions between on or about 27 May 98 and on or about
3 0 May 98, fail to obey a lawful general instruction, to
wit: paragraph 25.1, AFI 65-104, dated 1 May 96, by
wrongfully using your Government - - - - - - - Travel Charge
Card for purposes other than official government travel.
Reduction to AB. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(2) 5 Jun 98, Moody AFB, GA - Article 86. You, did, on or
about 26 May 98, without authority, absent yourself from
your place of duty at which you were required to be, and
did remain so absent until on or about 29 May 98.
Suspended reduction to AB, and 14 days restriction.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOC, 24 JUN 98 - Late for work.
LOCI 19 JLTN 98 - ~ereliction of duty.
LOCI 18 JUN 98 - Not returning to work after appointment.
f . CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.
(Discharged from Moody AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (7) Mos ( 2 4 ) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs ( 3 ) MOS (20) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 2 9 3 ) dtd 8 Sep 02.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: One issue I have with this is that I had gotten an Article 15 for
being AWOL. What caused me to be late was a broken down car. It broke down in
Savannah, GA while I was coming home from leave. After breaking down I called
my squadron commander and told him of the situation. After 4 days of being
stranded in Savannah, because the mechanic kept telling me he should get my car
back to me the next day, I decided to take the car & get it towed to Valdosta GA
Moody AFB. Everyday I reported to my superiors. After that first incident I
was unfairly singled out and treated bad.
ATCH
1. Congressional Correspondence.
2 . DD Form 214.
DEPARTMENT OF 'THE AIR FORCE
'*'
HEADpUAUTERS 347ll WIN6 (AM)
MOODY A11 FORCE BASE, 6EOUClA
20 August 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR 0
FROM: 69 FSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct (conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline). The authority for this action is
AFI 36-3208, section 5.50.2. If my recommendation for discharge is approved, your service will
be characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions (general). I am recommending that
your service be characterized as under honorable conditions (general).
2. My reasons for this action are as follows:
a
a. You, did, on or about 26 May 1998, without authority, absent yourself from your place of
duty at which you were required to be, to wit: Building 775, 69th Fighter Squadron, Weapons
Sections, located at Moody Air Forcc Base, Georgia, and did remain so absent until on or about
29 May 1998. For this offense, you received nonjudicial punishment pursuant to Article 15,
UCMJ dated 5 June 1998. Punishment included reduction to the grade of airman basic,
suspended until 3 December 1998, unless sooner vacated (Atch la).
b. On or about 17 Jun 98, without authority, you did not return to duty after taking your
cycle ergometry test. For this offense, you were counseled, as documented by a Letter of
Counseling (LOC), dated 18 Jun 98 (Atch 1 b).
c. On or about 19 Jun 98, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you
failed to complete volume 2 of your CDCs' within the allotted 30 day period. For this offense,
you were counseled, as documented by an LOC, dated 19 Jun 98 (Atch 1 c).
d. On or about 24 Jun 98, without authority, you were late reporting back to work after
lunch. For this offense, you were counseled, as documented by an LOC, dated 24 Jun 98
(Atch Id),
e. You, did, at or near Houston, Texas, and or Savannah, Georgia, on divers occasions
between on or about 27 May 1998 and on or about 30 May 1998, fail to obey a lawful general
instruction, to wit: paragraph 25.1, Air Force Instruction 65- 104, dated 1 May 1996, by
wrongfully using your Government American Express Travel Charge Card for purposes other
than official government travel. For this offense, you rece!bed nonjudicial punishment pursuant
to Article 15, UCMJ dated 14 Aug 1998. Punishment included reduction to the grade of airman
basic (Atch 1 e).
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising Special Court-Martial (SPCM)
jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the
Air Force and, if you are discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are
discharged, you will be ineligible for re-enlistment in the Air Force.
3. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you,
in Bldg 5 107, on 21 Aug 98 at
I have made an appointment for you to consul
-
0900. Please take your copy of this Notifjcation Memorandum and the attachments with you to
your appointment. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense,
4. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me within three duty days after receipt of this
notification letter, unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. If your
appointment with defense counsel is beyond three duty days after receipt of this letter, you
should contact the Area Defense Counsel office at extension 7-3421 to obtain a delay
request. I will send any statement(s) you submit to the separation authority.
5. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
6. You have been scheduled for a medical examination, You must report to the Moody Air
Force Base Hospital, Physical Exams Section, Bldg 3296, at 0730 on 26 Aug 98 for the
examination. Bring contact lenses or prescription glasses if applicable. If you have a family
history of diabetes, do not eat food fourteen (14) hours prior to this appointment. This is a
rnandatorv appointment.
7. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act Statement. A
copy of AFI 36-3208, is available for your use in the orderly room.
8. Execute the attached acknowledgment (Atch 2) and return it to me imm&iZRh.
Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents, Reasons for Discharge
a. AF Form 3070,5 Jun 98 (w/atchs)
b. LOC, 18 Jun 98
c. LOC, 19 Jun 98
d. LOC, 24 Jun 98
e. AF Form 3070,14 Aug 98 (w/atchs)
2. Receipt of Notification Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00142
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) Es. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 2993-00142 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00186
~~'2076t700]00i AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00186 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0254
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2002-0254 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The misconduct included late to work, failing a dorm room inspection, failure to go, financial irresponsibility, and improper wear of chemical warfare gear during an exercise. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1 .
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00033
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. b. Grade Status: A m - 4 Jan 00 (Article 15, 4 Jan 00) A1C - 11 Apr 99 A m - 11 Jun 98 (Article 15, 11 Jun 98) A1C - 2 NOV 97 Amn - 2 Jan 97 c. Time Lost: None. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was fair and just to me and I have grown and...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00081
(EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0081 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. For your actions, you received a LOR on 19 February 1999 (Atch 6).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00024
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand, and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. To: Air Force Review Board - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , From: : L...............-.-: RE: M y request for a discharge change.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00308
In addition, he received a Letter of Reprimand, twelve Records of Individual Counseling and two Letters of Admonishment for financial irresponsibility, violation of Tech Data, dereliction of duty, violation of AFOSH Standards, failure to perform tool box inspection, failure to properly inspect vehicle, late for duty, substandard workmanship, and for dress and appearance violations. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB,...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0031
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge. Svd: 04 Yrs 04 Mo 20 Das, of which AMs is 4 yrs 00 months 5 days (excludes 4 months 15 days lost time) . Sentence adjudged by military judge on 27 October 99: To be confined for 30 days, to be discharged from the Air Force with a bad...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0253
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE £1902-0253 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In reviewing this action, | find that there is a legally sufficient basis to separate Alc from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without P&R, as recommended. Honorable: AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.18.1, states that an honorable discharge should be given when the airman’s service has met Air Force standards...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0008
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p092-0008 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Background: On 24 March 2000, the 75” Security Forces Squadron Commander notified the respondent that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a pattern of misconduct, under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50. Lam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of misconduct.