Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0116
Original file (FD2001-0116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
(7
‘ . AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
enna. ILT
—
TYPE
X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL ena ° NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
VOTE OF THE BOARD cae |
MEMBERS SITTING ON] GEN TOTHC OTHER | DENY
—— — 1
a x
pr res - | -——
x
_— { J
X
X
X
a —— —_.. a
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHInITS SUBMITTED 10 THE HOARD Lue
A92,01, A94.05 A67.50 1. | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
[ HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
3 JUN 03 FD2001-0116 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND. THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL‘ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW B BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE, ne a = 7
REMARKS ~—
Case heard at Scott AFB, [linois.

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submitt an application to the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

 

 

TO: FROM:

SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3° FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AJR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-00116

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Scott
AFB, IL on June 3, 2003. The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:

Exhibit 5: Applicant’s contentions.
Exhibit 6: Master of Science in Health Services Administration Certificate

Exhibit 7: Doctor of Pharmacy Certificate

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge to Honorable is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record or that provided by the applicant substantiates an
impropriety or inequity that would justify upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Serious or Recurring Misconduct.
Applicant received 18 Memorandums for Record, 3 Records of Individual Counseling, and 1 Letter of
Counseling for bad judgment and bad conduct, improper wear of his uniform (four times), misconduct,
conduct unbecoming an officer, disrespect to a superior officer (three times), dereliction to duty (seven
times), failure to go, sexual harassment, and he was relieved from his supervisor responsibilities. The
applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The
DRB took note of the applicant’s duty performance as documented by his performance reports and other
information contained in the records. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any
positive aspects of the applicant’s duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate
for the reasons that were the basis for this case. It should be noted that the applicant, when asked by the
Board President if he reviewed the examiner’s brief and had an opportunity to carefully examine it and his
records, he stated that he did not have enough time to go through his records. The Board President stopped
the proceedings and asked the applicant if he wanted to reschedule the hearing and informed the applicant
that he had two months notice of this Board and approximately four hours prior to coming into the Board
today (3 Jun 03). The applicant stated that he was ready to proceed. Also, at the end of the hearing, the
Board President asked the applicant: “Do you feel that you have had a full and fair opportunity to prepare
and present your case to this Board today?” The applicant replied “definitely yes!” The DRB concluded
that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FDO1~-00116
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

eu, (Former 1LT)
ee:

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 93/06/25 UP AFR 36-12,
Chapter 2 & 3, para 2-3a, £ & h, and 3-7d (Serious or Recurring Misconduct).
Appeals for Honorable Disch. ne

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 60/10/26. Enlmt Age: 27 9/12. Disch Age: 32 8/12. Educ: Doctor
of Pharmacy. AFQT: N/A. A-N/A, E-N/A, G-N/A, M-N/A. PAFSC: 9246 -
Pharmacist. DAS: 91/02/15.

b. Prior Sv: Appt to 2Lt, and assigned to ARNG from 88/08/23 - 90/12/12,
of which AMS is 28 days. 1Lt - 89/05/28. OPR: 02.

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Transferred to ResAF 90/12/12, appointed to 1LT, 90/12/13 and ordered
to BAD 91/01/12. Svd: 2 Yrs 6 Mo 12 Das, of which AMS is 2 yrs 5 mos 14 das.

b. Grade Status: none.
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15’s: none.

e. Additional: RIC, 22 JUL 91 - Bad judgement & Bad conduct.

RIC, 07 SEP 91 ~- Proper wear of uniform.

MFR, 27 FEB 92 - Misconduct.

MFR, 12 MAR 92 - Disrespect to a superior officer.

MFR, 03 MAR 92 - Dereliction to duty.

MFR, 12 MAR 92 - Disrespect to a superior officer.

MFR, 09 JUL 92 - Disrespect to a superior officer.

LOC, 30 NOV 92 - Releaved from supervisor
responsibilities.

MFR, 23 DEC 92 - Dereliction to duty.

MFR, 08 JAN 93 - Dereliction to duty.

MFR, 26 MAY 92 - Dereliction to duty.

MFR, 26 JUL 91 - Failure to qo.

MFR, 04 SEP 91 - Dereliction to duty.

MER, 22 APR 92 - Dereliction to duty.

MFR, 26 MAY 92 - Dereliction to duty.

MFR, 12 MAR 92 - Uniform violation.

MFR, 26 FEB 92 - Sexual Harrassement.

RIC, O7 SEP 91 - Uniform violation.

MFR, 12 MAR 92 - Uniform violation.

MFR, 27 FEB 92 - Sexual violation.
FDO1-00116

MFR, 12 MAR 92 - Uniform Violation.
MFR, 06 NOV 92 - Conduct unbecoming an officer.

£. CM: none.

g. Record of SV: 91/01/12 91/05/13 Chanute AFB MS (HAF Dir)
91/05/14 92/05/13 Chanute AFB MS (Annual)
92/05/14 92/12/22 Chanute AFB MS (Cmdr Dir)
(Discharged from Chanute AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA, NDSM, AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (4) Yrs (10) Mos (03) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (6) Mos (12) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 00/02/14.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

Issue 1: As you can see from the above documents, my service performance
record while a member of the Army National Guard, was exemplory. (DOC #2).
After two weeks of Officer Basic Training, I was commissioned USAF. Granted I
was green but I did follow the rules as noted in DOC #1. I honored my country

& opportunity to serve in the Air Force.

Issue 2: As you can see from DOC #3 I state my case. My career
opportunities have been limited. This is evident even though I have gained
valuable experience both while in the military and the civilian sector. I
hold advanced University degrees.

Issue 3: I wish to pursue an upgrade in regards to my present discharge.
I believe a review of my current discharge status is in order. Currently, I
am in good standing with my profession, community, and church. In addition, I
hold a B.S. in Pharmacy, M.S. in Health Services Administration, and a Doctor
Of Pharmacy. Furthermore, we shoulde be cognizant of the fact that the
military and the civilian sector function under different standards, rules,
and regulations. It should be self evident that politics can play a
significant role in ones military career. In conclusion, the discharge I
received from the Air Force can and has affected my career in the civilian
sector. JI wish my USAF discharge to be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge.
Thank you.

ATCH

1. Statement of Upgrade.

2. Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Report.
3. Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Report.
4, Records of National Guard Service.

5. VA Cover Letter, 28 Nov OO.

01/04/23/ia
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS CHANUTE TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER (ATC)
CHANUTE AIR FORCE BASE, IL 61868

 

FROM: CTC/JA 10 MAR Ty

SUBJ: Legal Review of Proposed Officer Discharge Package -
First Licutenant 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0300

    Original file (FD2001-0300.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA TYPE " PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW . CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-0300 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In addition, the applicant also received two Letter’s of Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for failure to go, financial irresponsibility, altering an official document, and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00035

    Original file (FD2007-00035.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ATCH None a DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE- 3330TH TECHNICAL TRAINING WING (ATC) CHANUTE AIR FORCE BASE IL 6 1 888-5000 REPLY TO A ~ N O F : 3362 STUS/CC SUBJECT: Addendum to Notification Letter, 17 Jan 92 - Board Hearing TO , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 --------------------------------------------! Commander 1 Atch Acknowledgment of Receipt of Addendum to Notification Ltr DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORC CHANUTE AIR FORCE BASE IL 6...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0460

    Original file (FD2002-0460.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0460 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a change of the reason and authority for the discharge. 1 am initiating action against you under AFI 36-3206, chapter 2, paragraphs 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 43.3, 2.3.4, and 2.3.5 that requires you to show cause for retention on active duty. Jn response to this notification memorandum, you may, within 10 calendar days, tender flour resignation under AF] 36-3207, chapter 2, section B, with...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0376

    Original file (FD2002-0376.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMHER FD2002-0376 GENERAL: The applicant appeals f'or upgrade of discharge to honorablc. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. For the Government: A preponderance of the evidence establ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0086

    Original file (FD2002-0086.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD [NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) | GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA . CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0086 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the RE Code. In addition, he received four Records of Individual Counseling and a Memorandum for Record for failure to go (three times), delinquent debt, and dereliction of duty.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00259

    Original file (FD2003-00259.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN COUNSEL NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANUATJON O F COUNSEL YES I NO X MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTMC OTHER DENY VOTE OF THE BOARD X X X X X ISSUES A95.00 HEARING DATE 26 AUG 03 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 I CASE NUMBER FD2003-0259 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00167

    Original file (FD2003-00167.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Alc PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ COUNSEL :- : YES | NO xX [ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0167 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In addition, he received three Letters of Reprimand and two Records of Individual...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00044

    Original file (FD2005-00044.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. g. Record of SV: 03...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00285

    Original file (FD2003-00285.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0285 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as Sgt 28 Mar 88 for 6 yrs. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703408

    Original file (9703408.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board,the right to a personal appearance with counsel and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. ORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct described in the applicant’s record warranted the General characterization.