Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0212
Original file (FD2002-0212.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

    

 

     

PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL 1
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN DOTHC OTHER DENY
X
ny —— —~——
xX
X
xX
—
X
[issies = | INDEXNUMBER—SSCSOSSSOT:C*X 0” EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD.
A95.00 A67.10 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 + | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
19 DEC 02 FD2002-0212 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
___|

 

 

APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

 

 

REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

 

 

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER

 

 
 

DATE: 19 DEC02

INDORSEMENT

 
  

   

 

 

 

TO: FROM:
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°? FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0212

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,
and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the
available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant had three
Letters of Reprimand for being late for work (twice) and for financial irresponsibility, a Letter of
Counseling for failure to show up for work, a Letter of Admonishment for failure to report to work in the
proper uniform and required equipment and a Record of Individual Counseling for loss of gear, uniform and
conduct not becoming of a security policeman. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions,
the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative/repetitive behavior. The Board concluded the
disciplinary infractions were a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military members.

The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of

discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0212
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

ee (Former AlC) (HGH A1C)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 01/10/03 UP AFI 36-3208,

para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable
Disch,

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 80/11/09. Enlmt Age: 17 7/12. Disch Age: 20 10/12. Educ: HS DIPL
AFOT: N/A. A-74, E-43, G-48, M-48. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Forces
Apprentice. DAS: 99/12/06.

b. Prior Sv: AFRes 98/06/18 - 99/07/06 (1 Yr 0 Mos 19 Days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enld as AB 99/07/07 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 2 Mos 27 Das, all AMS,

b. Grade Status: A1C - 00/11/07
AMN - 00/01/07

c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15’s: None.

e. Additional: LOR, 13 AUG 01 - Late for work.

LOR, 26 JUL O01 - Financial irresponsibility.

LOR, 26 JUN O01 - Late for work.

LOC, 26 MAR 01 - Failure to show up for work.

LOR, 11 Dec 00 - Failure to account for two lost vest.

LOA, 22 AUG 00 - Failure to report to work in the proper
uniform and required equipment .

RIC, 5 Aug 00 - Loss of gear, uniform and conduct not
becoming of a Security Policeman.

£. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 99/07/07 - 01/03/06 Andrews AFB 4 (Initial)
(Discharged from Andrews AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (3) Yrs (3) Mos (16) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (2) Mos (27) Das
FD2002-0212

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/05/11.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
None.

02/08/20/cr
FD2002-0212
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

‘pe, (Former A1C) (HGH A1C)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 01/10/03 UP AFI 36-3208,

para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions. Appeals for Honorable
Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a, DOB: 80/11/09. Enlmt Age: 17 7/12, Disch Age: 20 10/12. Educ: HS DIPL
. AFOT: N/A. A-74, E-43, G-48, M-48. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Forces
Apprentice. DAS: 99/12/06.

b. Prior Sv: AFRes 98/06/18 - 99/07/06 (1 Yr 0 Mos 19 Days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enld as AB 99/07/07 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 2 Mo 27 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: A1C - 00/11/07
AMN - 00/01/07

c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15’s: None.

e. Additional: LOR, 13 AUG 01 - Late for work.

LOR, 26 JUL 01 - Financial irresponsibility.

LOR, 26 JUN 01 - Late for work.

LOC, 26 MAR 01 - Failure to show up for work.

LOR, 11 DEC 00 - Failure to account for two lost vest.

LOA, 22 AUG 00 - Uniform violation.

Loc, 5 AUG 00 - Failure to maintain accountability of
duty equipment.

£. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 99/07/07 - 01/03/06 Andrews AFB 4 (Initial)
(Discharged from Andrews AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.

1. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (3) Yrs (3) Mos (16) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (2) Mos (27) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/05/11.
FD2002-0212
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
None.

02/08/20/cr
! FO 200 2- OZ! 2

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 89TH AIRLIFT WING (AMC)

 

SEF 2 4 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0269

    Original file (FD2002-0269.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0269 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0269 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AI1C) (HGH SRA) 1. You, did, on or about 23 Jan 02, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0347

    Original file (FD2002-0347.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General service characterization from the Air Force for minor disciplinary infractions. The Respondent’s file reflects two Article 15s and three letters of reprimand. The Respondent’s commander has recommended the Respondent receive a general discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0462

    Original file (FD2002-0462.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no légal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0462 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD rs (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. LOC, dated 18 Nov 01 LOR, dated 18 Nov 01 AF Form 1058 w/Atch: LOR, dated 13 Mar 01 LOR, dated 30 Dec 00 LOR, dated 28 Dec 00 LOR, dated 28 Dec 00 AF Form 1058...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0313

    Original file (FD2002-0313.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0313 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. I wish to receive my school benefits yet I no (sic) that unless my discharge is upgraded I won't receive them. BACKGROUND: The Respondent is 25 years old and has been on active duty in the United States Air Force for approximately 2 years and 7 months.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0188

    Original file (FD2002-0188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0188 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0188 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. For these actions, Respondent received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 11 Jul 00. b.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0217

    Original file (FD2002-0217.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0217 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. After a thorough and complete consideration of the information submitted by the applicant, the applicant’s compelling personal testimony, and information contained in the record, the Board concluded there was sufficient mitigation and extenuation to substantiate upgrade of the discharge and to change the reason for the discharge. For this...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00155

    Original file (FD2003-00155.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0155 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change the Reason and Authority for discharge and change the RE Code. If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00155 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0194

    Original file (FD2002-0194.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cask NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECTSIONAT, RATIONALE FD02-0194 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the Reason and Authority for discharge, and to change the RE Cade. Altachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0194 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AB} 1. Direct his discharge with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge; or j Ppn2002-0/9F c. Recommend thatiigiiiiaiiee...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00330

    Original file (FD2003-00330.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 4 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I 1 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0433

    Original file (FD2002-0433.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0433 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. He also received seven Letters of Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for Dereliction of duties, failure to report a vehicle accident, failure to go, being late for work four times, failure to perform his duties, and failure to secure equipment. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enld as AB 15 Oct 97 for 4 yrs.