AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FDO 1-00025
I
CASE NUMBER
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety, which would justify a change of discharge.
The applicant's issue is listed in the attached brief
Issue: The applicant feels like he served his country with the best of intentions and wishes to receive his
G.I. Bill so that he can go back to school. The Board reviewed the record and concluded the conduct for
which applicant was discharged was a significant departure fiom the conduct expected of all military
members. The applicant had a conviction in a civilian court for assault. He received a Letter of Counseling
for leaving his workstation without authority and failing to properly account for his tools. He received two
Letters of Reprimand, one for failing to report to his place of duty and one for cruelty to a child. No
inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the records review.
many.offenses of the applicant amqunted to an overall serious problem that could not be tolerated. The
Board concluded that the character and reason for discharge were appropriate due to his misconduct.
The
The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case upon which to base an upgrade of
discharge.
1
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
prbcedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided hll administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board hrther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
?WDREWS AE'B, MD
FD-01-00025
(Former SRA)
-
'1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 00/03/27 UP AFI 36- 3208,
para 5 . 5 0 . 2 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline).
Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 7 5 / 0 4 / 1 5 .
AFQT: N/A. A-51, E-54,
Journeyman. DAS: 9 9 / 0 5 / 0 3 .
Enlmt Age: 1 7 5 / 1 2 . Disch Age: 24 1 1 / 1 2 . Educ:HS DIPL.
G - 4 1 , M-53. PAFSC: 2A353B - TAC Aircraft Maintenance
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 9 2 / 0 9 / 2 3 - 93/08/12
( 1 0 months 20 days)(Inactive).
all AMs.
inactive. AMN - 9 4 / 0 2 / 1 3 .
Transferred to USAFR 9 7 / 0 8 / 1 3 .
A1C - 9 4 / 1 2 / 1 3 .
EPRs: 4 , 5 .
( 2 ) Enld as AB 9 3 / 0 8 / 1 3 for 4 years. Svd: 4 yrs 0 mos 0 das,
Svd: 0 yrs 1 0 months 11 das, all
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenld USAF as SRA 9 8 / 0 6 / 2 4 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 9 Mo 4 Das, of which
AMs is 1 yr 9 mo 1 day (excludes 3 days lost time).
b. Grade Status: SRA - 9 7 / 0 6 / 1 9
c. Time Lost: 9 9 / 0 1 / 1 1 - 9 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 ( 3 days).
d. Art 15's: none.
\
a
e. , Additional: LOR, 20 NOV 98 - Dereliction of duty.
LOCI 20 NOV 98 - Failure to account for all tools.
Civilian Conviction, 15 NOV 9 9 - Battery.
LOR, 2 3 NOV 99 - Act of cruelty.
f. CM: none.
g . Record of SV: 9 8 / 0 6 / 2 4
9 9 / 0 6 / 2 3 Moody AFB
(Discharged from Moody AFB)
3 (Annual)
h. Awards & Decs: AFLSAR, AFTR, SWASM W / 1 SS, NDSM, AFEM W / 1 SS, AFOUA
W / l OLC, AFGCM W / 1 OLC.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: ( 7 ) Yrs (6) Mos ( 8 ) Das
TAMS: ( 5 ) Yrs ( 9 ) Mos ( 7 ) Das
4. aASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 2 9 3 ) dtd 0 0 / 1 2 / 1 4 .
(Change
Discharge to Honorable)
I wish to upgrade my disch rge from General (Under Honorable
Issue 1
Conditions)
to Honorable. I fee like I served my country with best intentions
and wish to have the opertunity (sic) to receive my VA Benefits (GI Bill) that
were assured to me on my discharge. I only wish to go school and one day maybe
(if possible) serve my country again. Which I enjoyed so dearly.
ED01 -00025
ATCH
1. DD Form 214.
01/01/23/ia
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
nuoqrrnmlts 34m wiwc (ACC)
MOODY AIR FORCE IME. CEOR611
2 Mar 00
MEMORANDUM FOR 347 WG/CC
FROM: 347 WGIJA
arge:
-.
arge and find it legally sufficient. On 3 1 Jan
ommended that the respondent, SrA dlld be
der other than honorable conditions
(UOTHC) discharge under the authority of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2, for a pattern of
misconduct (conduct prejudicial to good
took action on 68 FS/CC's recommendat
pline). On 2 Feb 00, before 347 WG/CC
ffered to waive his right to a discharge
neral) discharge. On 29
be accepted and that
does not recommend a
program of probation and rehabil
2. In reviewing this action, I find there is a legally sufficient basis to separat-from
Air Force with a gen
sufficient basis to sep
the
out P&R, as recommended. I also find there is a legally
the Air Force with a UOTHC discharge.
a. Basis for discharge: AFI 36-3208, paragbph 5.50.2, states that airmen are subject to
discharge for conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, which is defined as conduct that
tends to disrupt order, discipline, or morale within the military community. This category of
conduct also includes that which causes dissent, disruption, and degradation of mission
effectiveness, as well as conduct that tends to bring discredit on the Air Force in the view of the
civilian community. In this cas-isconduct
includes failure to go to his appointed
place of duty, leaving his assigned workstation without making an accurate account of his tools,
criminal assault, and cruelty to a child. These acts of misconduct resulted in one Letter of
Counseling (LOC), two Letters of Reprimand (Lob), a conviction for battery in Lowndes
County, Georgia and a prosecution for child abuse pending in the Lowndes County court system
(see Tab 3, Notification Memorandum, atch 1, for additional details).
b. Should-
discharged? In determining whether-hould
be discharged,
you may consider the nature of the offenses and the circumstances surrounding their commission.
saulted his girlfriend, who is now his wife. He was convicted of
2 months confinement and a fine of $250.00. He served 3 days in
confinement and was placed on probation fo
conviction, fine, confinement, and probatio
26 Oct 99, he repeatedly hit his stepdaughte
of his sentence. Despite this
rpetrated another domestic assault. On
injuries that required tre
1 Jan 00 memorandum recommending dischar
ieve that his actions bring discredit to the Air
and safety of his family and Air Force standards.” I concur.
isconduct and his response to the consequences of his
misconduct demonstrate an unwillingness to conform to Air Force standards. Consequently, he
should be administratively discharged.
c. Service characterization: There is a legally sufficient basis to discharg
general or a UOTHC discharge. AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.18.3, states that characterization of an
airman’s service as UOTHC is warranted when the airman’s acts or omissions constitute a
significant departure fkom the conduct expected of airmen. Examples of such behavior, acts, or
omissions include:
th a
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The use of force or violence to produce serious bodily injury or death;
Abuse of a special position of trust;
Disregard by a superior of customary superior-subordinate relationships;
Acts or omissions that endanger the security of the United States;
Acts or omissions that endanger the health and welfare of other members of the Air
Force; and
Deliberate acts or omissions that seriously endanger the health and safety of other
persons.
s resulted in his arrest and convict
ignificant departure fkom the conduct
m the Air Force with an under other than
. Air Force Instruction 36-3208, paragraph
treatment at a hospital. These acts o
expected of airmen. Therefore, rem0
honorable conditions (UOTHC) disc
1.18.2 states that an under honorable conditions (general) discharge is warranted when
significant negative aspects of the airman
isconduct, as described above clearly
aspects of the airman’s military record
outweighs any positive aspects of his record. Since the more negative characterization of
UOTHC is warranted by these facts, a general discharge is also legally supportable. The 68
FS/CC recommends that 347 WG/CC accept the conditional waiver and that 347 WG/CC
recommend 9AF/CC approve a general discharge without P&R. For reasons stated in paragraph
3 below, I concur with acceptance o-nditional
t or performance of duty outweigh positive
waiver and general discharge.
d. P&R: AFI 36-3208, paragraph 7.3, states tha P&R may be offered to airmen who have
demonstrated a potential to serve satisfactorily, have the capacity to be rehabilitated for
continued military service or completion of the current enlistment, or whose retention on active
duty in a probationary status is consistent with the maintenance of good order and discipline in
as recommended that P&R not be offered. According to
emorandum “If a civilian conviction, confinement and a
were not sufficient to encourag
likelihood that P&R will be successful.” I agree.
and (LOR) and a prior Letter of Counseling (LOC)
to meet Air Force standards, there is no reasonable
servgd for more than
e board. After con
serted his right to a board. On 2 Feb 0
if he was grante
s entitled to a hearing
Area Defense Couns
a conditional waiver
nditions (general) discharge.
Under the circumstances of this case, acceptance of the conditional waiver is recommended.
waiver would facilitate a rapid discharge
9 Feb 00 recommendation,^ co
the serious nature all
allegations. Third, the sole witness of both assaults is SrA
o has not been cooperative with our efforts to discharge SrA
FCS to provide us with
s misconduct, we recommend you
accept the conditional waiver and recommend thh 9 M/CC approve a general discharge for SrA
!dimm
4
hysical examination is not yet complete. However, AFI 36-3208 allows
4.
prw-volytary
is then held in abeyance until the member is found medically qualified for world\arideduty.
5. As the Special Court-Martial Convening Authority, you have the following options:
-
discharges to continue until actual separation. Any approved discharge
+
a. Retain the Respondent.
b. Reject the conditional waiver and give the member the option of either submitting an
unconditional waiver or requesting a board hearing.
c. Recommend that 9 AFKC acc
onditional waiver and approve an under
honorable conditions (general) discharge with or without the opportunity for P&R.
RECOMMENDATION
6. Recommend that 9 AFKC accept
honorable conditions (general) discha
proposed letter at Tab I .
conditional waiver and approve an under
the opportunity for P&R by signing the
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
IIEADQMRTEM 34Tlll WIN6 (A@)
MOODY AIR FORCE BASE, 6EORcll
MEMORANDUM F
FROM: 68 FS/CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
I
-
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of misconduct
(prejudicial to good order and discipline). The authority for this action is AFI 36-3208, paragraph
5.50.2.
2. My reasons for this action are as follows:
a. An investigation disclosed that, on or about 13 Nov 98, you failed to report for duty. For this
offense, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 20 Nov 98 (Atch 1 a).
b. On or about 17 Nov 98, you departed your assigned workstation without making an accurate
account of all your tools, to wit: ear protectors. For this offense, you received a Letter of
Counseling (LOC), dated 20 Nov 98 (Atch lb).
c. On or about 11 Jan 99, you intentionally caused substantial physical harm to an individual. For
this offense, you pled guilty and received a civilian conviction for committing battery (domestic
violence) as documented by
punishment included confin
balance was probated; and a $250.00 fine. Furthermore, you were ordered to attend @e Domestic
Violence Intervention Project and to have no violent con
result of this incident, you were issued a written order
refrain from any unsupervised contact with the victim
State Warrant (Atch IC). Your
service of 3 days in confinement, the
to
~
I
d. An investigation disclosed that, on or about 26 Oct 99, you committed an act of cruelty upon a
child by repeatedly hitting your stepdaughter causing her to suffer injuries which were treated at the
en no contact order, dated 28 O c 5 A t c h le)
refiain from any contact with your3epdaughter
LOR, dated 23 Nov 99 (Atch 10.
-
3. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. I am recommending that you receive an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. The commander exercising Special Court-Martial (SPCM) jurisdiction or a higher
authority will make the final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will be ineligibl for
reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied enlistment in any component of the armed
forces, and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.
4. You have the right to:
9toGal' Pow.=% foz d m e z i c a
a. Consult legal counsel;
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board;
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing;
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board hearing;
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before deciding to waive any of
your rights.
-
1 has been obtained to assist you. I
5. You have the right to consult counsel.
in Bldg 5 107, extension 342 1, at
have made an appointment for you to consul
1300 on 6 Dec 99. Please take your copy of
orandum and the attachments
with you to your first appointment with counsel. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have
another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as
determined according to AFI 5 1-201. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ
civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay expenses incident to the employment of civilian
counsel. Civilian counsel, if employed, must be readily available.
6. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within seven (n workdays, specifLing the rights
you choose to exercise. The statement must be signed in the presence of your counsel, who will
also sign it. If you waive your right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, you may
submit written statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the discharge authority
with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If you fail to respond, your failure
will constitute a waiver of the right to a board hearing.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. qou must report to the Moody Air Force
Base Hospital, Physical Exams Section, Bldg 3296, at 1400 on 6 Dec 99 for the examination. Then
on 9 Dec 99. Thes are mandatory appointments. Be
report to the Flight Surgeon’s ofice at
sure to bring your medical records to these ahpointments.
8. Any personal information you h i s h in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy
of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the orderly room.
~
9. If you request a board and you fail to appear without good cause, your failure - -.--
constitutes a &iG5 of your right to be present at the hearing.
t o s a r
-
-
_ _
10. The disckrge board or the discharge authority will make the finding and recommendations
required under 10 U.S.C. 2005(g).
-
1 1.
Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents, Reasons for Discharge
a. LOR, 20 Nov 98
b. LOC, 20 Nov 98
c. State Warrant, 12 Jan 99 (w/atch)
d. No Contact Order, 13 Jan 99 (w\atch)
e. No Contact Order, 28 Oct 99
f. LOR, 23 Nov 99
2. Receipt of Notification Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0253
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE £1902-0253 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In reviewing this action, | find that there is a legally sufficient basis to separate Alc from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without P&R, as recommended. Honorable: AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.18.1, states that an honorable discharge should be given when the airman’s service has met Air Force standards...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0254
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2002-0254 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The misconduct included late to work, failing a dorm room inspection, failure to go, financial irresponsibility, and improper wear of chemical warfare gear during an exercise. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1 .
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00186
~~'2076t700]00i AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00186 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00025
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant’s discharge should not be changed. As a result, you received a LOR, dated 8 Jun 99. Letter of Counseling, dated 23 Dec 98 | 3.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00006
In reviewing the evidence presented, I find there exists a legally sufficient basis to warrant separating -from the Air Force. Clearly and should be discharged. d. On or about 13 October 1994, you wrote a check to the Moody AFB Exchange in the amount of about $50.00, and thereafter, failed to place or maintain sufficient knds in your account to pay this check in full upon its presentment for payment.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0205
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHC | OTHER | DENY ISSUES A 4.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 Fike ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE \ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00266
LOC, 25 APR 04 - Failure to obey a lawful order and lack of LOR, 06 FEB 04 - Failure to go at the time prescribed. For this offense you received a LOR on 4 Jun 04 (Atch 11). If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance hnds may be subject to recoupment.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00142
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) Es. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 2993-00142 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00033
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. b. Grade Status: A m - 4 Jan 00 (Article 15, 4 Jan 00) A1C - 11 Apr 99 A m - 11 Jun 98 (Article 15, 11 Jun 98) A1C - 2 NOV 97 Amn - 2 Jan 97 c. Time Lost: None. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was fair and just to me and I have grown and...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00446
I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to perform assigned duties properly. This action may result in my discharge from the Air Force with an honorable discharge. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to perform assigned duties properly.