Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-02847
Original file (BC-2013-02847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 
IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02847
			COUNSEL:  NONE
   			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________ 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be reimbursed for the cost of his Personally Procured 
Movement (PPM) of Household Goods (HHG) from Davis-Monthan AFB, 
AZ, to Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA)-Randolph, TX.  

________________________________________________________________ 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In Nov 2012, he signed and returned his Permanent Change of 
Station (PCS) assignment notification to the 355th Force Support 
Squadron (FSS), Outbound Assignments Section, for his assignment 
to JBSA-Randolph with a Report Not Later than Date (RNLTD) of 
22 Apr 2013.  

He should have received PCS orders in early Feb 2013 but did not 
receive them until 1 Apr 2013.

The PPM was made on 21 Feb 2013, less than two months prior to 
his move.  He should be reimbursed since the late issuance of 
his orders was thru no fault of his own, rather the Air Force 
Personnel Center (AFPC) and Outbound Assignments.

The PPM was legal and accomplished in a normal move timeframe 
and was designed to save the Air Force money.

He should not be punished with undue costs as a result of his 
orders being delivered three weeks prior to his RNLTD.  

The Air Force is obligated to pay members to move when they 
receive orders.  Not paying him for the PPM because orders were 
late is unjust. 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of 
Station-Military.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.   

________________________________________________________________


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is on active duty in the grade of major (O-4).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  The applicant was selected for 
reassignment in Nov 2012 with a RNLTD of 22 Apr 2013.  His PCS 
orders were authenticated on 1 Apr 2013.  DPAPP contacted the 
355 FSS to determine why the orders were processed late and was 
advised by e-mail communique that the applicant did not complete 
the required personnel out-processing requirements until 19 Mar 
2013.  In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2102, Base Level 
Relocation Procedures, PCS orders are not released until all 
medical, dental, security clearance, retainability and Personnel 
Processing Code (PPC) requirements are accomplished.  

The complete DPAPP evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He was originally denied reimbursement of his PPM claim by the 
JBSA Transportation Management Office (TMO).  He petitioned 
AFPC/DPAPP to review his case but it was denied based on an 
incomplete e-mail from the 355 FSS.  DPAPP’s denial was based on 
the presumption that he was the limiting factor in completing 
the PCS documents in a timely manner.  This is incorrect as it 
was due to AFPC and 355 FSS not being able to determine in an 
accurate and timely manner what was needed for his PCS to JBSA-
Randolph.  The 355 FSS did not confirm that his reassignment was 
a PCS and not a Temporary Duty (TDY) until 8 Mar 2013.  He was 
not notified until 1 Mar 2013 that proof of aerospace physiology 
was required for his orders; and he was not notified until 
26 Mar 2013 that he was required to sign an AF Form 63, Active 
Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) Acknowledgement Statement. 

In further support of his request, the applicant provides a 
personal statement, timeline of events and e-mail communique.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit D.   

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed. 

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  We note the 
applicant contends the delay in receiving PCS orders was outside 
of his control and he should not be penalized.  However, IAW AFI 
36-2102, PCS orders are not released until all medical, dental, 
security clearance, retainability and other processing 
requirements are accomplished.  Furthermore, the Joint Federal 
Travel Regulation (JFTR) requires PCS orders be published prior 
to the shipment of any household goods.  We do not deny that the 
applicant was inconvenienced as a result of the late issuance of 
his PCS orders; however, in cases where PCS orders are delayed, 
the requirement and expectation is to postpone the shipment of 
any household goods until orders are published.  In view of the 
foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s request be denied.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence that the applicant was 
treated differently than others similarly situated, we find no 
equitable basis to grant the relief sought in this application.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2013-02847 in Executive Session on 15 Apr 2014, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

     , Panel Chair
     , Member
     , Member	


The following documentary evidence in Docket Number BC-2013-
02847 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Jun 2013, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 2 Jul 2013, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Sep 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 20 Sep 2013, w/atchs.  




 
Panel Chair 




 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02500

    Original file (BC 2013 02500.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the necessary documentation for approval of the personally procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG) during a permanent change of station (PCS) move. ECAF states the applicant indicates he should be reimbursed for three primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03022

    Original file (BC 2013 03022 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $1,293.13 to offset Temporary Lodging Expenses (TLE) incurred with her Permanent Change of Station (PCS) assignment to Ramstein Air Base (AB), Germany. A request was submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force Financial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02699

    Original file (BC-2005-02699.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02699 INDEX NUMBER: 128.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Feb 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The date he entered active duty (EAD) be changed from 28 Jul 04 to 14 Jul 04. The applicant was ordered to active duty via Special Order A-2314, dated 15 Jun 04, with an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04133

    Original file (BC-2008-04133.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04133 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders issue date be changed to on or before 1 Jun 08 so that he can be reimbursed for his Do-It- Yourself (DITY) move. Even though his orders were being amended to reflect the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05852

    Original file (BC 2013 05852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommend the Board change the applicant’s DAS to SJAFB to reflect 28 May 13 since this is the day the Join Spouse assignment was approved by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) and also this is the day the applicant was officially assigned to SJAFB. AFMAN 65-116V1, Defense Joint Military Pay System Active Component (DJMS-AC) FSO Procedures, paragraph 41.2.3.1.2.2. states “If the member takes leave in the local area of the new PDS (Permanent Duty Station) without contacting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00067

    Original file (BC-2013-00067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He initiated shipment of household goods prior to this temporary duty (TDY) assignment in order to alleviate stress on his wife and because of the short time frame between his return from TDY and permanent change of station (PCS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends partial relief. The complete PPA HQ/ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02382

    Original file (BC 2013 02382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members must test by the last day of the month, six calendar months following the previous passing test (e.g., if member tested on 15 April, then member must retest on/before 31 October of the same year.” With a RNLTD date of 30 May 11, the applicant was not required to test prior to his scheduled FA and was allowed 42 days after the RNLTD date to test, but was not required to do so. DPSIM concludes that the contested FA is a legitimate unsatisfactory score, in accordance with AFI 36-2905,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02714

    Original file (BC-2004-02714.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Government Bill of Lading (GBL) weight for moving his household goods exceeded the maximum allowable weight authorized by the Joint Federal Transportation Regulation (JFTR) allowance of 14,500 pounds There appears to be a gross weight miscalculation on the weight charged by the contract carrier. With the error of JPPSO failing to weigh his shipment, there is no way to determine the correct weight of his household goods shipment. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00423

    Original file (BC-2013-00423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His PCS order was issued on 10 August 2012. When he attempted to file his paperwork with the TMO he was told that he was not entitled, as the shipment was made prior to issuance of the PCS order. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that competent authority issued a Letter-in-Lieu of order dated 20 July 2012, and the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01879

    Original file (BC-2012-01879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date arrived station (DAS) at Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB) be changed from 28 February 2012 to his original DAS of 3 September 2008. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...