Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-02494
Original file (BC-2013-02494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02494
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The 7.5 days of leave he lost in FY12 be restored to his leave account. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to a short notice Temporary Duty (TDY) during the period 27 Jun 12 through 9 Nov 12, he lost 7.5 days of leave.  His original TDY orders were through the end of Aug 12, so he would have been able to use his leave, but he was extended.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served in grade of major (O-4) at Ramstein Air Base, Germany during the period of time in question.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.    

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends the applicant’s request be granted.  The applicant states that due to a short notice TDY, which was then extended beyond the end of the fiscal year, he lost 7.5 days of leave.  The applicant’s Master Military Pay Account reflects that the member entered FY12 with 74.5 days of leave, earned 30 days of leave, and used 22 days causing the applicant’s ending leave balance to be 82.5 days for FY12.  The applicant’s leave balance at the beginning of FY13 was 75 days with the member losing 7.5 days of leave.  IAW AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, members are ineligible for Special Leave Accrual (SLA) in the case of normal Permanent Change of Station (PCS) moves or TDYs that prevent the applicant from using leave.  Although the applicant does not qualify for SLA, he was unable to take leave due to a TDY, which was beyond his control.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.    

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted.  Although we find no evidence of an error on the part of the Air Force, due to the fact the applicant’s TDY was extended through the remainder of the fiscal year after he had departed, we believe he was not afforded the opportunity to use his leave through no fault of his own, and it is in the interest of justice to provide the requested relief.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that seven and a half (7.5) days of leave were added to his leave balance.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02494 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the record as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 May 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 23 Jan 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Feb 14.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair







Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001

    Original file (BC 2013 01001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726

    Original file (BC-2012-05726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states “members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs.” AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., “unit commanders: advise members who schedule “use or lose” leave in August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04787

    Original file (BC-2012-04787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not demonstrated a clear error or injustice. If at any time the leave balance drops to or goes below 75 days, then there is no longer any SLA protected leave. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03471

    Original file (BC-2012-03471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03471 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 days of lost leave be restored, or as an alternative, he be allowed to sell back 15 days of leave. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains Special Leave Accrual (SLA) allows members who are faced with circumstances that prohibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302

    Original file (BC-2012-01302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05768

    Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05768

    Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01612

    Original file (BC-2012-01612.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01612 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 days of lost leave be restored. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains SLA shall not be a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 October 2008 through 30 September 2013) when it is a result of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00868

    Original file (BC 2014 00868.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice that warrants restoring 2.5 days of leave to the applicant’s records. If, at any time, the leave balance drops to or goes below 60 days (75 days during the period 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 15), then...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00465

    Original file (BC-2011-00465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) and FY08, she requested SLA and was approved to carryover 120 days of leave. However, she came to understand that her SLA request in FY09 was lost when she changed jobs and was informed in Oct 09 that she had to either sell back or lose 10 days of leave. The application was timely filed.