Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01711
Original file (BC-2013-01711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01711
	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for his actions 
following the 2010 Earthquake in Haiti.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was put in for the AmnM for his action in Operation UNIFIED 
RESPONSE; however, in Nov 11, it was denied.  

The Board has since ruled that the teams’ actions did indeed 
meet the requirements of the AmnM.  The Pararescueman (PJ) Team 
Leader had his medal approved; and due to the fact that the 
medals were submitted for the same actions, it stands to reason 
that he should receive this award as well.  Considering both put 
their lives in considerable risk to rescue trapped Americans and 
Haitians.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served in Port-au-Prince, Haiti as a Pararescue 
team member while assigned to the 23rd Special Tactics Squadron, 
in direct support of Operation UNIFIED RESPONSE, from 13 to 
23 Jan 10.  The five man team was attached to the Fairfax County 
Urban Search and Recovery team while in Haiti.

On 5 May 10, the Air Force Decorations Board (AFDB) considered 
and denied the applicant’s request for award of the AmnM.  On 
2 Nov 11, the AFDB considered and denied the Air Force Special 
Operations Commander’s (AFSOC/CC) request for reconsideration 
for the AmnM.

On 2 Aug 12, the AFBCMR considered and granted the Team Leader’s 
request for award of the AmnM for his actions during Operation 
UNIFIED RESPONSE.  On 17 Sep 13, the AFBCMR denied the Team 
Leader’s request for entitlement to the 10 percent pay increase 
for retirement pay.

The AmnM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United 
States or foreign military personnel who, while serving in any 
capacity with the United States Air Force, distinguish 
themselves by heroism involving voluntary risk of life under 
conditions other than those of actual conflict with an enemy.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action.  We note the AmnM was awarded to the Team 
Leader and the applicant believes he should be awarded the AmnM 
for the same reasons.  After carefully reviewing the available 
evidence, it is our opinion that the applicant’s request should 
be approved.  In this respect, we note that each member of the 
team played an equal role in the mission’s success.  Moreover, 
their individual acts of heroism were consistent with those of 
the Team Leader and involved the same voluntary risk of life 
under extreme conditions against insurmountable odds.  In view of 
this, we find the evidence is sufficient to recommend approval 
for the AmnM.  Although not requested by the applicant, 
generally, when an AmnM is awarded, the Secretary of the Air 
Force, Personnel Council (SAFPC) determines entitlement to a 
10 percent increase in retirement pay.  In view of this, we 
considered the applicant for the additional pay; however, we did 
not find substantive evidence that his actions on the days in 
question rose to the level of "extraordinary," as required for 
award of the 10 percent increase in retired pay.  Therefore, we 
find no basis to recommend approval for entitlement to an 
additional 10 percent increase at retirement.  Accordingly, we 
recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to the extent 
indicated below.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was 
awarded the Airman’s Medal for his heroism involving voluntary 
risk of life while participating in Operation UNIFIED RESPONSE 
from 13 January 2010 to 23 January 2010.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01711 in Executive Session on 31 Jan 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 13, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Redacted Copy of Precedent Case.




                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02079

    Original file (BC 2013 02079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 5 May 10, the Air Force Decorations Board (AFDB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for award of the AmnM. On 2 Aug 12, the Board considered and granted the Pararescue Team Leader’s request for award of the AmnM for his actions during Operation UNIFIED RESPONSE. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05558

    Original file (BC 2012 05558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Pararescueman (PJ) Team Leader received the AmnM for performing duties that all pararescue team members performed. On 2 Aug 12, the Board considered and granted the Pararescue Team Leader’s request for award of the AmnM for his actions during Operation UNIFIED RESPONSE. The complete MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03891

    Original file (BC-2011-03891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial noting there is no evidence of a recommendation to upgrade the AFCM or official documentation concerning the disapproval and downgrade of the initial recommendation for the AmnM. The applicant did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02179-2

    Original file (BC-2012-02179-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00124 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a ten percent increase in his retired pay as a result of receiving the Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for heroism. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01203

    Original file (BC 2014 01203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council approved the award of the AmnM to the applicant for his action, at which time they also considered and disapproved award of the ten...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03887

    Original file (BC-2011-03887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 1 November 1977 to 30 June 1998. DPSIDR states the Department of the Air Force Special Order GB- 110, dated 15 November 1991, does not indicate the applicant was awarded a ten percent increase in retired pay. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00122

    Original file (BC 2014 00122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00122 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the ten percent annual retired pay increase he qualified for by being awarded the Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for heroism. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04685

    Original file (BC 2013 04685.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04685 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to a 10 percent increase in retired pay due to his being a recipient of the Airman's Medal (AmnM). The applicant believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he only recently discovered that all members who receive the AmnM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03419

    Original file (BC-2011-03419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did not realize at the time that he could receive a 10 percent increase in his retirement pay for receiving the AmnM and now humbly requests the increase. The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) determines entitlement to a 10 percent increase in retirement pay for the AmnM when awarded to enlisted members for extraordinary heroism upon approval of the award. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01034

    Original file (BC-2012-01034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had the squadron followed through with the AmnM processing, the former commander would have seen and approved the awards. One of the approved citations actually states "voluntary risk of life," which is what all of their original citations read before citations were changed to the AFCM for “acts of courage.” The AFI states that the AmnM will not be awarded for "normal performance of duties." Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Dec 2012, w/atch.