Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01704
Original file (BC-2013-01704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01704
	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL: NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he made a timely election for 
spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit 
Plan (RCSBP).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He originally made his RCSBP election in 2004.  On 21 Oct 2011, 
he was remarried.  He should be allowed to change his RCSBP 
election since his children are over the age of 19 and his 
divorce decree does not stipulate he provide SBP for his ex-
wife.  On 1 Jul 2013, he retired and was told that he could 
enter a new SBP election within one year of his retirement.  He 
was waiting to complete his Department of Veterans Affairs 
disability process to determine which SBP plan he should select.  
He was not aware that he was required to make a SBP election 
within one year of his marriage.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election 
Certificate, Certificate of Marriage and Property Settlement and 
Custody Agreement. 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force.  Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial.  DPTT states that the applicant did 
not provide the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) a copy of 
his marriage certificate within the one year as dictated by law.  
He was not court ordered to provide former spouse coverage to 
his former spouse.  However, on 6 Dec 2004, he made a former 
spouse election under the RCSBP.  He can remove his former 
spouse at any time.  However, there are restrictions to add a 
spouse.  According Title 10,Subsection 1448 (a)(5)(B) Manner and 
time of election - "Such an election must be written, signed by 
the person making the election, and received by the Secretary 
concerned within one year after the date on which that person 
marries or acquires that dependent child."  On 19 Mar 2012, the 
applicant contacted ARPC and he was instructed to provide ARPC 
with a copy of his current marriage certificate and a complete 
copy of his divorce decree so they could counsel him correctly 
about his options for updating his election.  The applicant did 
not provide the requested documents to ARPC within the timeframe 
prescribed by law.

The complete DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 10 May 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the member for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a 
response has not been received (Exhibit C).

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 13 Dec 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

     , Panel Chair
     , Member
     , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2013-01704:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Apr 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 9 May 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 2013.




								
								Panel Chair

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974



8

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974


3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 00362

    Original file (BC 2012 00362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 May 93, the member completed an ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, and indicated that he had no eligible spouse or children and deferred participation. The applicant and the member were divorced on 24 Aug 93. As of this date, a response has not been received by this office (Exhibit C).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01862

    Original file (BC-2012-01862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of DD Form 2656-10, Final Decree of Divorce, Domestic Relations Order [Military Retirement], letters from her attorney, letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and numerous other documents in support of her request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00793

    Original file (BC-2011-00793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Aug 1994, the decedent and the applicant divorced. If the documents were provided within the required timeframe, DPTT would have been unable to update the member's RCSBP election due to the member not electing to participate in the Plan when eligible. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of her request, the applicant provides two letters.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01662

    Original file (BC-2013-01662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and the decedent divorced on 25 June 2010. The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. The divorce decree did not award former spouse coverage under the RCSBP as dictated by law.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01718

    Original file (BC 2012 01718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPTT states the member and/or his former spouse had one year from the date of the QDRO, dated 9 Oct 01, to make a former spouse deemed election to the Secretary concerned. He states the QDRO does not provide the required “election data” necessary to complete the SBP enrollment form. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00302

    Original file (BC-2011-00302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides an expanded statement and copies of a divorce decree, power of attorney, and DD Form 2293, Application for Former Spouse Payments from Retired Pay. The divorce did not award the former spouse coverage under the RCSBP; however, neither the member nor his former spouse deemed an election for former spouse coverage under the RCSBP. The applicant contends that her deceased former husband’s Parkinson’s disease impacted his ability to make a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03122

    Original file (BC-2010-03122.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Neither he nor his former spouse knew of the requirement to file for coverage within one-year following their divorce. He is relying on the Board to correct this mistake in order for his former spouse to receive a benefit that she earned during the 29 years he served our country. The Legal Advisor states the applicant’s intentions were clear and unfortunately many service members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01612

    Original file (BC 2014 01612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01612 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as beneficiary for “former spouse” coverage under the decedent’s Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant was awarded full survivor benefit annuity under RCSBP by court order. However, the applicant did not notify ARPC of her RCSBP election within one year as prescribed by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01573

    Original file (BC-2013-01573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his divorce in 2005, he submitted his divorce decree to keep his Air Force records current. On 18 Dec 2012, DPTTE faxed the applicant a letter explaining how and when a deemed election must be submitted and advised that if she believed there was an error or injustice that she could apply to the Board for a correction of her former spouse’s records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00171

    Original file (BC-2011-00171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, neither the applicant nor his former spouse deemed an election for former spouse coverage under the RCSBP and the applicant's RCSBP election changed to children only. When the member filled out his application for retired pay, DD Form 2656, he made an election for former spouse. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show...