RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00455
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her 20 Dec 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She failed the sit-up component of the FA resulting in an
overall unsatisfactory rating.
The failed FA is an injustice as she is currently pending
medical care for a chronic hip condition.
Her Primary Care Manager (PCM) signed an AF Form 108, Physical
Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, stating she had a
preexisting medical condition that affected her ability to pass
the FA.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of Air
Force Form 108.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade
of senior airman (E-4).
The applicants request was considered by the Fitness Assessment
Appeals Board (FAAB) on 6 Nov 2013. The FAAB disapproved the
request due to no medical documentation to support her claim and
forwarded it to the Board for consideration (Exhibit C).
On 16 Dec 2013, she requested assistance from her Congressman
stating that her physician signed off on the FA failure stating
it was due to a medical issue. She submitted the medical
documentation and recently received a preliminary decision that
the FA would not be removed. She has attempted to get her
attorney as well as an Area Defense Counsel to advise her. The
FA failure has adversely affected her and she is concerned that
submitting the appeal on her own is a fruitless matter.
The applicants most recent FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite Score
Rating
13 Jul 2013
90.67
Excellent (Exempt:
Cardio, Sit-ups)
20 Dec 2012
65.00
Unsatisfactory (Exempt:
Cardio)
29 Jun 2012
100
Excellent (Exempt:
Cardio, Push-ups,
Sit-ups)
22 Dec 2011
100
Excellent (Exempt:
Cardio, Push-ups, Sit-
ups
10 Jun 2011
97.00
Excellent (Exempt:
Push-ups, Sit-ups)
16 Dec 2010
97.89
Excellent (Exempt:
Push-ups)
15 Mar 2010
86.50
Good
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. In accordance with Air Force
Instruction 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, paragraph
10, an airman who becomes injured or ill during the FA and is
unable to complete all required components will have the option
of being evaluated at the Medial Treatment Facility (MTF) but
the test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit
commander. The applicant did provide an AF Form 108 stating she
had a medical condition precluding her from achieving a passing
fitness score; however, there is no documentation from the unit
commander invalidating the FA failure.
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded stating that she has a chronic health
condition that affected her ability to pass the FA. She was
diagnosed with sacroiliitis affecting her hip, chronic
myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia. Her physician signed
off on the Air Force Form 108 stating she had a medical
condition that prevented her from passing the test.
She disagrees with the Air Force Advisory and provides
documentation from her physicians. She is seeing several
specialists and is undergoing a medical review board. She is on
strict profiles which further limit her fitness capabilities.
Her squadron commander issued her a Letter of Counseling (LOC)
but then dropped it as a result of her medical condition. Her
attorney advised her that the Board was the only authority
capable of removing the failed FA. She believes her commander
would have invalidated the failed FA if he knew he could have
removed it.
She struggles on a daily basis as a result of her medical
conditions and pushed herself too hard on the day of the FA.
Her medical board will likely address these issues but it is
unfair and discriminatory that the failed FA not be removed in
light of her health problems. She has not failed any test since
then, and never failed any other test before the Dec 2012 FA
failure. She has faithfully served the Air Force for nearly
four years; she will complete her masters degree and served in
the Honor Guard. She is potentially facing medical separation
and should be afforded the opportunity to have her records
corrected.
She provides letters from her physicians, AF Form 108, AFFMS
information, response to the LOC and Standard Form 600,
Chronological Record of Medical Care.
The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting
partial relief. We note the Air Force office of primary
responsibility recommends denial stating there is no evidence
that her commander invalidated the FA. However, it is our
opinion that the medical evidence provided by the applicant
substantiates that she had a preexisting medical condition which
precluded her from successfully passing the sit-up portion of
the 20 Dec 2012 FA. While the applicant requests the entire FA
be removed, the evidence only supports exempting the sit-up
portion. Accordingly, we recommend the applicants record be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the sit-up
component of her Fitness Assessment, dated 20 Dec 2012, be
amended to reflect exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management
System.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-00455 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 2014, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following pertinent evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jan 2013, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Sep 2013, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 Nov 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 2013.
Exhibit E. Congressional Inquiry, dated 16 Dec 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Dec 2013, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235
The applicants last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939
Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01087
The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. The applicants last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Nov 13 79.00 Satisfactory 26 Jul 13 77.20 Unsatisfactory 1 Mar 13 EXEMPT EXEMPT 31 Dec 12 23.75 Unsatisfactory *10 Sept 12 64.67 Unsatisfactory 27 Feb 12 78.30 Satisfactory *15 Nov 11 68.20 Unsatisfactory *12 May 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05716
Beyond the cardio exemption, there is no evidence that the applicant should have been exempt from any other component. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response the applicant states that after receiving the Air Force advisory opinion it was clear that he did not provide the supporting medical documents, therefore he submits a copy of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04663
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment dated 27 Jul 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). At that time she stated that she could not continue due to cramping in her leg, but was advised that the score was not official until put into...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04933
In spite of this, her profile allowed her to perform crunches, but after getting another note from her doctor, the Deployment Availability Working Group (DAWG)1 threw it out and agreed with her cardiologist that all timed events were dangerous. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicants commander provides a memorandum, dated 13 Mar 2014, to serve as his invalidation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441
On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicants medical provider. A list of the applicants last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591
On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment. On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03257
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the sit-up component of the contested FA reflect "exempt" in the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note that while the applicant requests the entire FA be...