Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00225
Original file (BC-2013-00225.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00225

			COUNSEL:  NONE
	
			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her narrative reason for separation of “Fraudulent Entry Into 
Military Service (Medical)” be corrected.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her recruiter told her to deny all questions regarding her 
medical issues.  

In support of her request, the applicant provided copies of her 
DD Form 2807-2, Medical Prescreen of Medical History Report, 
congressional correspondence, and a notarized witness statement.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 
25 April 2012.

2.  On 5 October 2012, the applicant was notified by her 
commander that he was recommending her for discharge from the 
Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 Military 
Retirements and Separations and AFI 36-3208, Administrative 
Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective 
Enlistments, paragraph 5.15, under Discharge for Fraudulent 
Entry.  The specific reason for this action was: she 
intentionally concealed a prior service medical condition.  They 
discovered she had a history of headache syndrome that was not 
documented on her DD Form 2807-2.  

3.  On 5 October 2012, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the 
notification of discharge and was advised of her right to 
consult legal counsel as well as submit a statement to the 
commander in her own behalf.  The applicant waived her right to 
consult legal counsel and to submit a statement in her behalf.  

4.  Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient, the 
discharge authority approved the recommendation and directed the 
applicant be discharged with an entry level separation.  The 
applicant was released from active duty on 11 October 2012.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AETC/SGPS recommends denial.  SGPS states that a review of the 
records and medical notes from Wilford Hall Medical Center 
(WHMC) indicate the applicant was seen at the Reid Clinic on 
25 September 2012, for headaches and was diagnosed with Headache 
Syndrome due to her long history of headaches since childhood.  
This was not disclosed during her medical prescreening and the 
problem continued during basic training.  Because this is 
disqualifying for military service she was processed for an 
entry level separation.  

The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C 

1.  AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.  DPSOR states the applicant 
did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices 
that occurred in the discharge processing.  She provided no 
facts warranting a change to her separation code, or narrative 
reason for separation.  Based on the documentation on file in 
the master personnel record, the discharge was consistent with 
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge 
authority.  

2.  On 14 September 2012, the medical staff determined the 
applicant had the disqualifying condition prior to enlistment.  
On 3 October 2012, the applicant signed a statement that she did 
not disclose her history of headache syndrome because her 
recruiter told her to withhold her past medical history from the 
Air Force.  Although the recruiter informed the applicant not to 
disclose her history, the applicant agreed not to disclose her 
history.  They concur that fraudulent enlistment was the correct 
basis for discharge.  

The complete AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 March 2013 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E).  To date, a response has not been received.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely.  

4.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  After careful 
consideration of the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s 
separation, we are persuaded she did not deliberately try to 
conceal or omit her long history of headaches.  We have no 
reason to not believe the applicant’s assertions that she was 
misinformed by her recruiter regarding what information she 
should or should not disclose.  We believe the applicant’s 
explanation and supporting statement from her mother of the 
events surrounding her enlistment and separation provide a 
reasonable basis to resolve this matter in her favor.  In view 
of this, and to preclude any further injustice to the applicant, 
we recommend that the narrative reason for her separation and 
corresponding separation code be changed to “Secretarial 
Authority.”  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was 
discharged on 11 October 2012, with a narrative reason for 
separation of "Secretarial Authority” rather than “Fraudulent 
Entry Into Military Service (Medical)” and a separation code of 
"KFF," rather than "JDA". 

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 17 October 2013, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2013-00225:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 November 2012, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 5 February 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 12 March 2013.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 March 2013



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05601

    Original file (BC 2013 05601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05601 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry level separation be changed to a medical discharge with benefits. Her dependent medical records reflect that she had an allergy to "pecan" nuts. Nevertheless, since the applicant was presumed fit to enter military service [at least from a musculoskeletal perspective] and she was presumably...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03351

    Original file (BC-2012-03351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based upon the physician’s findings, the applicant was notified by her commander of his intent to recommend her for an uncharacterized entry-level separation based on fraudulent entry, under the provisions of Air Force Program Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.15 under Basis for Discharge for Fraudulent Enlistment. Subsequently, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge and directed the applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02622

    Original file (BC-2011-02622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Block 28 – Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” to read “Erroneous Enlistment” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicant’s eight-page statement is summarized as follows: 1) During the first meeting with her Air Force recruiter, the applicant disclosed her bee and penicillin allergies. Her recruiter instructed her that she did not need to disclose this information when she...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02476

    Original file (BC 2014 02476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 Dec 12, the case was found to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority approved the commander’s recommendation, directing the applicant be issued an entry-level separation with a basis for discharge of fraudulent entry. The applicant’s commander notified him on 5 Dec 12 he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force for entry-level separation (Fraudulent Entry) for deliberately concealing a prior service medical condition. The following documentary evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00439

    Original file (BC-2010-00439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00439 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (fraudulent entry into military service), the corresponding separation code of JDA, and his reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02908

    Original file (BC 2013 02908.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02908 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter the military. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00657

    Original file (BC 2014 00657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00657 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be changed to honorable. The Staff Psychology Provider memorandum dated 10 Jan 11 shows he self-reported a history of sleepwalking and his DD Form 2807-2 is clearly marked “no” in response to the question on sleepwalking. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03584

    Original file (BC-2012-03584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her narrative reason for separation “Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service” and the corresponding separation code of “JDA” be changed. The specific reason was on or about 4 January 2012, at a mental health evaluation conducted by a psychologist at Behavior Analysis Service (BAS), she revealed that she had a history of a suicide attempt and anger issues that occurred prior to her entry into the Air Force. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05831

    Original file (BC 2013 05831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05831 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of “Discharge Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service” be changed to “Erroneous Enlistment.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has not taken the disqualifying...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01674

    Original file (BC-2012-01674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01674 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry into Military Service) along with the corresponding separation code of “JDA” be changed to “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...