Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00219
Original file (BC-2013-00219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00219
			COUNSEL:  NONE
	  		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His 26 Sep 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a pre-existing medical condition at the time of the FA.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter from his medical provider.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is serving on active duty in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).

The applicant’s most recent FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
26 Jun 2013
87.20
Satisfactory  
19 Dec 2012
87.67
Satisfactory 
26 Sep 2012
62.70
Unsatisfactory
20 Mar 2012
78.10
Satisfactory
27 Dec 2012
43.00
Unsatisfactory
29 Jun 2011
85.40
Satisfactory
1 Mar 2011
43.10
Unsatisfactory
1 Dec 2010
47.70
Unsatisfactory

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit B. 

________________________________________________________________

 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states the applicant provided a Medical Condition Determination for FA Test Failures issued by a medical provider indicating he in fact had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test, however; there is no evidence that his unit commander invalidated the FA.  Air Force Instruction, 36-2905, Fitness Program, Air Force Guidance Memorandum (AFGM) 4, states that if the medical evaluation validates an illness or injury, the unit commander may invalidate the test results.  There is no evidence of an error or injustice as the applicant did not provide any supporting documentation from the unit commander invalidating the test results.   

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Oct 2013 (Exhibit C) for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office has not received a response.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00219 in Executive Session on 17 Dec 2013, under the provisions of AFI 362603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 2013, w/atch.
Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 20 Sep 2013, w/atch.
Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 2013.




								  
								Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05554

    Original file (BC 2012 05554.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05554 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Jun 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) failure be corrected in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). At the time of the FA, he was unaware of his medical condition. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550

    Original file (BC 2013 01550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00610

    Original file (BC-2013-00610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of letters from his medical care providers and SF Forms 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care. We note in a memorandum dated 21 Nov 13, the applicant’s group commander restored the applicant’s grade to TSgt based on additional medical evidence that was not provided at the time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02001

    Original file (BC 2013 02001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02001 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In the letter he expresses his opinion, explaining how his medical condition and pride of admitting his physical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04647

    Original file (BC-2012-04647.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. In view of the medical documentation submitted in support of this appeal indicating the prescribed inhaler contributed to his failure during the cardio component of the contested FA, the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01174

    Original file (BC 2013 01174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01174 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 14 July 2011, 02 Feb 2012, and 31 Mar 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822

    Original file (BC 2013 00822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00617

    Original file (BC-2013-00617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00617 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 Jan 2013 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial stating there is no evidence that his unit commander...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078

    Original file (BC 2013 03078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...