Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01923
Original file (BC-2012-01923.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01923 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
    
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was not informed of the requirement to request his transfer of 
Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to retiring. 
 
The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation. 
 
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant retired from the Air National Guard in the grade of 
lieutenant colonel (0-5) on 7 Sep 06. 
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
National Guard Bureau, which is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
NGB/A1Y recommends denial.  Post 9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33, became 
effective 1 Aug 09 based on Post 9/11 Veteran Education Act of 
2008.    The  Public  Law  states  in  part,  that  “an  individual  may 
transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the 
Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.”  In this case, the 
Post  9/11  GI  Bill  had  not  yet  been  established  prior  to  the 
applicant retiring in 2006.   
 
The NGB/A1Y complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 5 Nov 12 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the National Guard Bureau office of primary responsibility and 
adopt  their  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion  that  the 
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01923 in Executive Session on 8 Jan 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 
 
 
 
 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2012-01923 
was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, NGB/A1Y, dated 4 Oct 12. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Nov 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03206

    Original file (BC-2012-03206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would have transferred his benefits had he been informed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05310

    Original file (BC 2012 05310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05310 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. At the time of his separation, he only had 14 years satisfactory service towards retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03630

    Original file (BC-2012-03630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. A1Y states that the applicant did not transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement as defined in Public Law No 110-252, nor follow the instructions given by his Force Support Squadron (FSS) for retirement out-processing. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01346

    Original file (BC-2012-01346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated letter the applicant responds that he is submitting the letter to provide further explanation of his request to accomplish the Post 9/11 TEB. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. However, based on the applicant's complete submission, we find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02569

    Original file (BC 2014 02569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Prior to his retirement in Sept 09 he submitted a request online through his personnel office to transfer his Post 9/11-GI Bill Education Benefits to his children. The applicant states, that the OPR is correct in that he was briefed on the Post 9/11-GI Bill and the process to transfer his educational benefits. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 Sep 09, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03249

    Original file (BC-2012-03249.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He does not know what office notifies retiring military personnel of the option to transfer educational benefits and is not sure when the educational benefits began. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 12.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01457

    Original file (BC-2012-01457.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He attempted to transfer his benefits to both of his sons before he retired. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00913

    Original file (BC-2012-00913.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) was not conveyed in a timely manner before his retirement date. However, based on the applicant's complete submission and his available military records, we find no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04634

    Original file (BC-2012-04634.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not provided guidance or advice regarding the need to adjust or transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlement prior to his retirement. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01282

    Original file (BC 2013 01282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01282 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependent. However, the applicant’s request was for the TEB to her dependent. In this case, the applicant argues she was never briefed on the rules and regulations governing the...