Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01920
Original file (BC-2012-01920.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01920 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 
 
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
 
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  fitness  assessments  (FAs)  dated  1  November  2004  and  6 
December  2004  be  removed  from  the  Air  Force  Fitness  Management 
System (AFFMS).  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
Unofficial FA scores were entered into AFFMS contrary to the Air 
Force  Instruction  (AFI).    On  16  January  2004  he  had  a  passing 
score  of  75.30.    The  squadron  commander  implemented  a  policy 
that the fighter squadron members must score at least an 81 on 
their FA.  If they scored below 81, they were required to test 
every month until they scored at least an 81 because they were 
the  81st  Fighter  Squadron  (FS)  and  the  commander  could  use 
practice tests to assess fitness standards.   
 
His  next  official  test  was  administered  on  16  July  2004.    He 
passed  with  a  76.35  score.    The  81  score  policy  remained  in 
effect  and  when  he  failed  the  practice  assessment  tests  on 
1 November 2004 and 6 December 2004, both scores were input into 
AFFMS contrary to the AFI.  He passed his next official test on 
21 January 2005 with a score of 75.60. 
 
In January 2005 he was told by the unit fitness program manager 
(UFPM)  there  was  no  way  to  remove  the  scores  from  AFFMS.    He 
tried  to  have  them  removed  again  in  2006  after  a  permanent 
change  of  station  (PCS).    AFI  36-2905,  AFGM3,  3  Jan  12, 
identified  AFBCMR  as  the  authority  to  remove  FA  scores  from 
AFFMS.  A practice test should not show up in AFFMS.   
 
In  2004  FA  tests  were  based  on  date  of  birth.    Since  his 
birthday  is  in  July,  his  tests  were  due  in  January  and  July.  
These  were  the  only  times  official  tests  were  supposed  to  be 
entered into AFFMS. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
AFFMS Individual Fitness Assessment History.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A.   

 

 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  in 
the grade of O-4, Major.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ  AFPC/DPSIM  recommends  denial.    DPSIM  states  at  the  time  of 
the  applicant’s  fitness  assessments  the  governing  Air  Force 
instruction was AFI 10-248 not AFI 36-2905.  AFI 36-2905 became 
effective  on  1  July  2010  and  does  not  apply  to  any  fitness 
assessments prior to that date.   
 
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
In his response dated 11 July 2012, the applicant states that on 
4 November  2004,  AFI  10-248  dated  1  January  2004,  makes  clear 
“the  annual  fitness  assessment  provides  commanders  with  a  tool 
to  assist  in  the  determination  of  overall  fitness  of  their 
military personnel.”  Paragraph 3.4., under “Scheduling” states 
frequency of fitness testing should be based on previous fitness 
score unless earlier assessment is necessary to accommodate the 
AEF 
for 
intervention/fitness  improvement.    Paragraph  3.4.1  states  the 
scheduling frequency for an excellent/good test score is within 
12 months.  The applicant indicates he was not scheduled for an 
AEF rotation so an earlier test was not necessary and scheduling 
should have been within 12 months since his previous test score 
was in the good category.   
 
The  applicant  provides  an  expanded  statement  of  the  events  of 
his 1 November 2004 and 6 December 2004 practice assessments and 
his multiple attempts to have the scores removed from AFFMS.  He 
further  states  he  has  five  scores  entered  into  AFFMS  from 
16 January 2004 through 21 January 2005 for his “annual” fitness 
assessment which is contrary to AFI 10-248.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  response,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit D.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 

available 

maximize 

rotation 

and 

time 

 

1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The  application  was  not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After  a 
thorough  review  of  the  evidence  of  record  and  the  applicant’s 
submission we believe relief is warranted.  The Board notes the 
comments  of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility, 
indicating  the  applicant  has  failed  to  sustain  his  burden  of 
proof  to  substantiate  his  claim.    However,  we  believe  he  has 
raised sufficient doubt regarding the contested practice fitness 
assessments.    In  this  respect,  we  note  that  guidance  regarding 
the  scheduling  frequency  of  the  fitness  assessments  is  not 
clearly  outlined  in  AFI  10-248  dated  1  January  2004,  which  has 
been  superseded  by  AFI  36-2905,  1  July  2010,  whose  current 
guidance  on  practice  tests  does  not  apply  to  the  applicant’s 
case,  as  stated  by  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary 
responsibility.  Therefore, in view of the above and noting the 
applicant’s  history  of  otherwise  acceptable  fitness  levels,  we 
recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The  pertinent  military  records  of  the  Department  of  the  Air 
Force  relating  to  APPLICANT  be  corrected  that  the  Fitness 
Assessments dated 1 November 2004 and 6 December 2004 be removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application 
in  Executive  Session  on  10  January,  2013,  under  the  provisions 
of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 
 

 

 
The  following  documentary  evidence  was  considered  in  AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2012-01920: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dtd 28 March 2012, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 31 May 2012, w/atch. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 June 2012. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 11 July 2012, w/atch. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
 

Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00021

    Original file (BC-2012-00021.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, E, and G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove his 19 Feb 2010 FA from the AFFMS. DPSIM states the applicant is requesting his FA dated 19 Feb 2010 be removed from the AFFMS. The complete DPSID evaluation, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05619

    Original file (BC 2012 05619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since his 21 April 2010 FA was removed from his record, which was the basis for his demotion action, his rank should be restored. There is no demotion action or demotion order in his personnel records. The applicant contends that his former grade should be restored because his demotion was based upon four consecutive fitness assessment (FA) failures, but one of the four failures was later declared void and removed from his records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02382

    Original file (BC 2013 02382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members must test by the last day of the month, six calendar months following the previous passing test (e.g., if member tested on 15 April, then member must retest on/before 31 October of the same year.” With a RNLTD date of 30 May 11, the applicant was not required to test prior to his scheduled FA and was allowed 42 days after the RNLTD date to test, but was not required to do so. DPSIM concludes that the contested FA is a legitimate unsatisfactory score, in accordance with AFI 36-2905,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006

    Original file (BC-2012-02006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His provider’s memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test.” On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01212

    Original file (bc-2012-01212.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 27, para 4.4.4; XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01212 COUNSEL: NONE IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 15 Mar 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03598

    Original file (BC-2012-03598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He failed the contested FA due to a medical condition that prevented him from achieving a passing score. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he would like to amend his request to have the EPR rendered for the period 1 February 2011...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05052

    Original file (BC-2011-05052.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. He was clearly not afforded the time allowed to acclimatize after his arrival in Korea as the AFI directs before being scheduled for his FA, thus,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097

    Original file (BC-2012-01097.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05244

    Original file (BC 2012 05244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the reporting period 14 Mar 09 through 13 Mar 10, be declared void and removed from her military personnel records. At the time, there were no provisions that authorized the one- mile walk component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03286

    Original file (BC-2012-03286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03286 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) scores dated 30 March 2012 and 18 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took note of the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommendation; however, we agree with the BCMR...