RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05565
COUNSEL: NONE
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 26 Sep 12, be removed from
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to health reasons she was unable to pass the FA. On 27 Sep
12, she was examined by her provider who determined her health
condition was the underlying cause for the failure.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy AF Form
108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, and
a copy of her FA scores.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A resume of the applicants FA results are as follows:
Date Composite Score Rating
5 Oct 12 100.00 Excellent
*26 Sep 12 70.88 Unsatisfactory
21 Mar 12 80.13 Satisfactory
2 Nov 11 80.63 Satisfactory
27 Apr 11 89.00 Satisfactory
* Contested FAs
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The applicant failed to
demonstrate an error or injustice. Further, according to the
governing instructions, If an Airman becomes injured or ill
during the FA and is unable to complete all required components,
he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical
Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count
unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The AF Form 108
provided by the applicant is evidence of injury/illness and the
commander acknowledged that there was a medical reason for the
applicants failing the FA. However, there is no evidence the
commander invalidated the assessment. While the medical
authority can recommend the FA be removed due to injury, only
the commander can actually invalidate the assessment.
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 8 Mar 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-05565 in Executive Session on 12 Sep 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Oct 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 25 Feb 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Mar 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235
The applicants last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00433
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939
Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05615
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05615 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 1 Jan 13 83.20 Satisfactory 4 Oct 12 70.70 Unsatisfactory 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625
According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered Unsatisfactory. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02244
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that there was a medical condition that precluded him from passing the FA and recommended invalidation of the FA. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 24 Jul 13 80.33 Satisfactory *25 Apr 13 26.33 Unsatisfactory 12 Oct 12 82.33 Satisfactory 28 Mar 12 85.44 Satisfactory 30 Dec 11 72.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 2 Jan 14 a similar request...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03075
A list of the applicants FAs since she entered the service is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 3 Jul 13 75.67 Exempt Satisfactory *15 Apr 13 81.00 25/0.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Nov 12 87.10 38/6.00 Satisfactory 16 Apr 12 84.10 42/7.50 Satisfactory *Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis that, The applicants injury was validated by the applicants medical provider, but there was no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02896
In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Air Force Guidance Memorandum on Fitness Program “if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander.” In this instance it is clear the applicant did not report to the MTF upon completion of her FA due to the elevated heart rate. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01784
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 28 Jan 13 0.00 Unsatisfactory 29 Oct 12 68.78 Unsatisfactory 30 Apr 12 88.00 Satisfactory 20 Oct 11 Exempt Exempt *26 Jul 11 67.50 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence, specifically no commander invalidation. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured...