Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05110
Original file (BC-2012-05110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05110
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE
			
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The deceased former member’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), naming the applicant as the beneficiary.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The couple’s divorce decree, dated 6 Apr 95, states her ex-husband may not change his SBP, which named her as the beneficiary.  He paid the premiums on the plan.  It was only after his death on 14 Oct 12 that she found out his SBP had been suspended back on 26 May 95.  She was never informed by either the Air Force or her attorney that she needed to do anything to maintain the SBP.  The SBP should have never been allowed to be changed since the divorce decree clearly states it may not be changed.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval.  A person’s eligibility to receive a spouse SBP annuity terminates upon divorce.  However, the law provides two mechanisms for changing spouse coverage to former spouse coverage.  One of the following actions must be exercised within the first year following the divorce: (1) the retiree may file an election change, or (2) the former spouse may request the retiree be deemed to have made such a change on his or her behalf.  In the latter case, the former spouse must provide legal documentation showing the member agreed, or that the court ordered the member to establish former spouse coverage.  If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter.  The former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member’s death even though a member fails to notify the Defense Finance and Accounting Service—Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP premiums afterword.

The member and the applicant were married on 4 Sep 58.  The member retired for disability effective 8 May 71, and elected spouse only coverage based on full retired pay during the plan initial enrollment (21 Sep 72 to 20 Mar 74).  The parties divorced on 26 May 95.  The divorce decree stated the applicant should be considered as the member’s “surviving spouse” and prohibited him from changing the election or designation of the applicant as the SBP beneficiary.  There is no evidence the member submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within the first year of their divorce.  Records maintained by the DFAS-CL reflect spouse coverage was suspended effective 26 May 95, and SBP premiums ceased at that time.  There is no evidenced either party remarried; therefore, there is no competing claimant.  The member died on 14 Oct 12.  The current amount of the SBP monthly annuity is $2,265; however, release of payments would not be authorized until the retroactive premium debt of $45,801 (plus interest) is recovered.  To deny the applicant’s request would be to deny her an asset awarded to her by the court.  

The complete AFPC/DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted.  Although we find no evidence of an error on the part of the Air Force, we believe that it is in the interest of justice to provide the requested relief.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the DECEASED FORMER MEMBER be corrected to show that on 27 May 1995, he elected former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) based on full retired pay, naming his former spouse as the eligible former spouse beneficiary.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05110 in Executive Session on 31 Jul 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Oct 12, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 13 Nov 12.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Dec 12.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02386

    Original file (BC 2014 02386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the former member’s death certificate, divorce decree, Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, marital status affidavit and various other documents associated with her request. None of the documents the applicant provided (Separation and Property Agreement or QDRO) had language that would entitle her to deem former spouse SBP coverage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her attorney submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05021

    Original file (BC-2012-05021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence either party submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce. SBP premiums for spouse coverage continued to be deducted from the member’s retired pay, and the former spouse’s name and date of birth remained as the applicant’s eligible spouse beneficiary until DFAS-CL received his 19 Mar 12 request to change spouse coverage to former spouse SBP coverage. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00425

    Original file (BC-2013-00425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record to show he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay effective 25 Jan 07, naming the former spouse as the eligible beneficiary. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00712

    Original file (BC 2014 00712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A person's eligibility as an SBP spouse beneficiary terminates upon divorce; however, the law provides two mechanisms for changing spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. The court order awarded the applicant the SBP and DFAS-CL records continued to reflect the applicant’s name as the eligible spouse beneficiary and SBP premiums continued to be deducted from the member's retired pay until his 14 Oct 13 death. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00704

    Original file (BC 2014 00704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted DD Form 1882, for former spouse and child coverage; however, DFAS-CL did not honor the election because it was not received until after the one-year eligibility period. However, while the applicant contends the election for former spouse coverage was made within the required time, no evidence has been provided, to our satisfaction, that she or the deceased former member submitted a valid former spouse election during the first year following their divorce. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03731

    Original file (BC 2013 03731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The decedent elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Jul 95 retirement. There is no evidence either party submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce as the law requires. The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant acknowledges the change to the advisory opinion to recommend the decedent’s record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00338

    Original file (BC 2014 00338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). Second, we note that the divorce decree submitted by the applicant was not final, as it was not executed by both parties and the court. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05676

    Original file (BC 2013 05676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated the beneficiary for her former spouse’s Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). As such, we find the death certificate provided by the applicant sufficient to conclude that the decedent was not married at the time of his death. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614

    Original file (BC 2013 05614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedent’s retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...