Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04505
Original file (BC-2012-04505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04505 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records reflect time served in Vietnam. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While in the service he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and 
the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. He was assigned to the 
1980th Communications Squadron at Takhli, Thailand. He further 
states he had boots-on-the-ground in Vietnam. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 15 February 
1965. 

 

The applicant was honorably released on 24 August 1968 and 
transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of 
AFM 39-10 (Convenience of the Government). He served 3 years, 
6 months and 10 days on active duty and credited with 11 months 
and 23 days of foreign service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states a review of the 
applicant’s Master Personnel Records did confirm service while 
permanently assigned with the 1980th Communications Squadron at 
Takhli Air Base, Thailand, from 31 August 1967 to 23 August 1968, 
for a period of 11 months and 23 days which is the amount 
recorded on his DD Form 214. Unfortunately, a thorough review of 
his records failed to substantiate his claim of foreign service 
in the Republic of Vietnam due to no documentation such as travel 
vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of evaluation, decorations, 
or other official military document that reflect that travel was 
completed and the inclusive periods of the travel. 


 

The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 10 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s 
contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence 
of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
provided sufficient evidence to substantiate time served in 
Vietnam. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04505 in Executive Session on 16 May 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 


 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04505 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 September 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAPP, dated 27 November 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 December 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05812

    Original file (BC-2012-05812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on their review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine that the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) should have been awarded during the applicant's service from 7 June 1965 to 31 October 1985 and was not reflected in his records. The complete AFPC/DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04798

    Original file (BC-2011-04798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04798 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR indicates that the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03313

    Original file (BC 2014 03313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official military records reflect his Vietnam Service and Vietnam/Southeast Asia Service Ribbons. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), attached at Exhibit C and Exhibit D. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04804

    Original file (BC-2012-04804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04804 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s master personnel records do not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02609

    Original file (BC-2012-02609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States – Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect his service time in Vietnam or Thailand. Although he has been unable to provide copies of the travel vouchers for these TDYs, in view of the fact the foreign service documented on his DD Form 214 exceeds his tour length in Taiwan, as confirmed by the OPR, by 3 months and 21 days, we find the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04559

    Original file (BC-2012-04559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states she and her husband were married approximately two years after his retirement from the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04250

    Original file (BC-2011-04250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request to reflect service time in the Republic of Vietnam. DPAPP states they could not verify any time served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he served 60...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03969

    Original file (BC-2011-03969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________ ______________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate that he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 Jul 71 and served on active duty until his Honorable discharge on 18 Dec 72. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04004

    Original file (BC 2013 04004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Personnel Center Directorate of Assignments confirmed “Boots on the Ground” at Takhli Air Base, Thailand, from 26 August 1973 to 23 July 1974, for 10 months and 28 days of Foreign Service. On 17 October 2013, their office notified the applicant that his DD Form 214 correctly reflects his Foreign Service and that since specific locations are not annotated on a member’s DD Form 214, he can use their letter as proof of “Boots on the Ground” in Thailand. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01274

    Original file (BC-2012-01274.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR states based on the applicant’s duties and responsibilities as an aircraft mechanic, his duty location (Okinawa, Japan), and the fact his DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the VSM and RVCM, the likelihood of his having served in direct support of military operations supporting Vietnam is highly likely. This document is not inherently part of Air Force members’ personnel records; therefore, this documentation is not always...