Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04559
Original file (BC-2012-04559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-04559
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE
	
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her deceased husband’s record be corrected to reflect he had 
boots on the ground in Vietnam.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her husband was appointed as the pay agent while overseas.  
According to her husband, he went to Vietnam once a month to pay 
personnel that were assigned to his unit.  His death was due to 
an Agent Orange condition.

In support of the request, the applicant submits the service 
member’s death certificate and special orders. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The decedent is a former member of the Air Force who retired on 
31 December 1968.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  A review of the decedent’s Master 
Personnel Records failed to substantiate any Foreign Service 
time in Vietnam.  However, his service in Thailand from 12 July 
1966 through 4 July 1967 was verified. 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant states she and her husband were married 
approximately two years after his retirement from the Air Force. 
During the almost 39 years of marriage, he often told her the 
details of his assignments while on active duty in Thailand.  He 
was assigned to the 355th Supply Squadron and was responsible for 
accounting and records maintenance of various supplies.  

In doing this, he was in direct contact with herbicides stored 
and used within Thailand perimeters and in Vietnam.  His 
additional duties included that of paymaster for his squadron, 
of which, many were in Vietnam.  He carried a briefcase to pay 
those members in cash.  

She has had several career military members review her husband’s 
records.  They concur that he would have been exposed to Agent 
Orange while stationed in Thailand, as well as, when he traveled 
to Vietnam. 

Her husband passed away on 9 March 2010, after a brief battle 
with lung cancer.  She seeks this correction to qualify for a 
claim made with the Department of Veteran’s Affairs for Agent 
Orange benefits.  It is their opinion that his cancer was the 
result of his exposure to Agent Orange. 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit E.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the applicant’s submission in judging the 
merits of the case, we are not persuaded that a change in the 
record is warranted.  The facts and opinions stated in the Air 
Force advisory appear to be based on the evidence of record and 
have not been adequately rebutted by the applicant.  Therefore, 
we agree with AFPC/DPAPP and adopt their rationale as the basis 
for our conclusion that there is no error or injustice in the 
record.  While we are sympathetic to the applicant’s 
circumstance, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04559 in Executive Session on 18 June 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Panel Chair
			Member
			Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dtd 29 Sep 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B.  Member's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dtd 27 Nov 12.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 10 Dec 12.
Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant’s Response, dtd 7 Jan 13, w/atchs.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03634

    Original file (BC-2006-03634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03634 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: JULIANN BAILEY HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 28, 2008 _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s record be corrected to show he served in Vietnam and received the Vietnam Service Medal. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02633

    Original file (BC 2010 02633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02633 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. DPAPP states the applicant’s master personnel records do not contain information that reflects his service in Vietnam or Thailand. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00567

    Original file (BC-2009-00567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her late husband's DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, his death certificate and a letter from the Agent Orange Administration. On 19 Apr 08, AFPC/DPAPP requested the applicant provide documentation showing her late husband served in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00567...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03825

    Original file (BC-2010-03825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states they were unable to location documentation in the applicant’s master personnel records reflecting service in Vietnam. The complete HQ AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. The applicant provided a response to the request from HQ AFPC/DPAPP. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03337

    Original file (BC 2013 03337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP requested the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect Indochina Service as “Yes.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIC recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the decedent’s Primary Specialty Number and Title. DPSIC states that Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 42372 and the AFSC title (Aircrew Egress Systems Repairmen), captured on the decedent’s DD Form 214 were correct at the time of his 23 Jun 1977...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03242

    Original file (BC 2014 03242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal letter, a copy of his DD Form 214, and copies of his medical records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02231

    Original file (BC-2010-02231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the former member has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05154

    Original file (BC 2013 05154.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05154 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her spouse’s records be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating...