Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04498
Original file (BC-2012-04498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04498 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge 
be upgraded to honorable. 

 

2. His records be corrected to reflect his correct service 
number. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

1. He was discriminated against and the circumstances 
surrounding his discharge were unfair. Although he was 
discharged for the possession of marijuana, he was told that he 
would receive an honorable discharge within six months of his 
separation. For more than 25 years he has tried to have his 
records corrected, but to no avail. He was led to believe there 
was nothing that could be done because his military records were 
destroyed by fire. 

 

2. His service number may have been transposed in his military 
records. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military personnel records were located in the 
area most heavily damaged in the fire at the National Personnel 
Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. The applicant provided a NA Form 
13038, National Archives and Records Administration, which 
indicates he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 31 March 1955 
and served on active duty until he was furnished a UOTHC 
discharge on 8 August 1957. 

 

On 4 June 2013, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for comment within 30 days. As of 


this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. 
According to officials at NPRC, the applicant’s records were 
destroyed by fire in 1973 at the NPRC. Therefore, the facts 
surrounding his separation and character of service could not be 
verified. However, based on the presumption of regularity in 
the conduct of governmental affairs, we must assume the 
applicant’s discharge and service characterization were proper 
and in compliance with the directive under which it was 
effected. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has 
presented no evidence to indicate otherwise. In the interest of 
justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on 
clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence of a 
successful post-service transition, we are not inclined to 
recommend granting relief upon this basis. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend the relief sought in this application. In regards to 
the applicant’s assertion that his records reflect an incorrect 
service number, we note the applicant’s available personnel 
records correctly reflect his service number. However, it 
appears his service number was transposed on the Certification 
of Military Service document he submitted. Since this is not an 
official Air Force document, but one generated by NPRC, the 
Board has no authority to correct it. Therefore, in view of the 
above, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested 
relief. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04498 in Executive Session on 9 July 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 September 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 June 2013. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05721

    Original file (BC 2012 05721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05721

    Original file (BC 2012 05721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03421

    Original file (BC-2011-03421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03421 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. Although the applicant states that he has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01624

    Original file (BC 2013 01624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01624 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In response, the applicant provided a character reference, a personal narrative of his time in the Air Force, and the prescription for his glasses (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01095

    Original file (BC-2013-01095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented sufficient to conclude that the applicant’s post-service activities overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02733

    Original file (BC-2012-02733.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02733 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The circumstances surrounding his discharge were unjust. After careful...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02381

    Original file (BC-2011-02381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDRA states the PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions, (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). DPSIDRA indicates that the applicant has not provided a detailed personal account, medical documentation verifying he received a wound as a direct result of enemy action that required medical treatment, and eye witness statement(s) to help support his claim. We note that although the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03789

    Original file (BC 2013 03789.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03789 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has carried the stigma of the UOTHC discharge for over 67 years. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02163

    Original file (BC 2013 02163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM) and Air Force Crew Wings. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00849

    Original file (BC-2013-00849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in the Air Force from 12 Sep 1954 to 11 Sep 1962 and he does not have a copy of his records which were destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. DPTS states that based on available documents, they can only confirm that the applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 12 Sep 1954 and was discharged on 11 Sep 1962 with 8 years total service. All relevant evidence...