RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04235
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in
Vietnam.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While stationed at Tachikawa Air Base, Japan, his unit took
several missions on temporary duty into Vietnam, which was during
the draw down to the war effort in 1970 and 1971. Because
President Nixons Vietnamization policy did not acknowledge
entering Vietnam it placed limits on the number of troops in that
country.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), created on 8 Jul 65, is awarded
to all service members of the Armed Forces who, between 4 Jul 65
and 28 Mar 73, served in the following areas of Southeast Asia:
in Vietnam and the contiguous waters and airspace; in Thailand,
Laos or Cambodia or the airspace thereover and in the direct
support of military operations in Vietnam. The specific
eligibility criteria requires a member to be attached to or
directly serving for one or more days with an organization, or
aboard a naval vessel, directly supporting military operations;
actually participate as a crew member on one or more aerial
flights directly supporting military operations; or serve on
temporary duty (TDY) for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive
days, although these time limitations may be waived for personnel
participating in actual combat operations. However, no member may
be issued both the AFEM and the VSM for service in Vietnam.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. According to the official
documentation, the applicant served in Vietnam for a total of
17 days; he did not serve in Vietnam the required 30 consecutive
or 60 non-consecutive days. Therefore, he is ineligible for
awarded of the VSM.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 14 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the applicants complete submission and
noting the VSM criteria, we are not persuaded that his records
are in error or unjust. In this respect, we note that although
the applicant has provided copies of TDY orders, with amendment,
assigning him on two separate TDYs to the RVN, and copies of two
travel vouchers, they do not support that he performed 30
consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days of TDY in the RVN. In
view of this and since there is no evidence the applicant was
attached to or directly serving for one or more days with an
organization directly supporting military operations or actually
participated as a crew member on one or more aerial flights
directly supporting military operations, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04235 in Executive Session on 25 Apr 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2012-04235
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Sep 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 Nov 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04801
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04801 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or a Badge reflecting his service during that era. In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03274
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03274 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05113
Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03128
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial and states that there is no evidence that supports the applicants contention that he served in Vietnam during the inclusive dates for these awards. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05422
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant did not serve in the area of eligibility for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days. Unfortunately it cannot be determined whether the applicant meets the eligible criteria for award of the VSM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, based on a review of the available...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870
However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04187
To qualify, a service member must have actually participated as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations, or have served on temporary duty (TDY) for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03773
Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) c. Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) d. National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) e. Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA) Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY. The complete DPSID evaluation is at exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054
In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicants official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...