RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04187
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was a crew chief doing combat refueling missions in Southeast
Asia (SEA). He received combat pay for every month he was
stationed in the overseas area. Because he was on orders to be
on the missions and in harms way, he deserves the same
recognition as the flight crews he accompanied.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 20 Aug 65 and served on active duty
until 14 Jan 69 when he was honorably discharged and was
credited with 3 years, 4 months, and 25 days of total active
service, which included 5 months and 15 days of foreign service.
On 28 Jul 68, 22 Aug 68, and 30 Sep 68, the applicant
participated in combat air refueling missions in the SEA hostile
fire area as a non-crew member.
The VSM is awarded to members of the armed forces who, between
4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in Vietnam, its continuous
waters, or airspace there-over; or Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia
and the airspaces there-over, and in direct support of
operations in Vietnam. To qualify, a service member must have
actually participated as a crew member in one or more aerial
flights directly supporting military operations, or have served
on temporary duty (TDY) for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive
days.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating that after a thorough
review of the applicants official military personnel record and
documentation provided, they were unable to verify the applicant
met the criteria for award of the VSM. There is no official
documentation verifying the applicant served in the eligible
areas and his participation in the three documented flights were
as a non-crew member and do not meet the criteria for the award.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04187 in Executive Session on 14 May 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Sep 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 4 Jan 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03274
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03274 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05422
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant did not serve in the area of eligibility for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days. Unfortunately it cannot be determined whether the applicant meets the eligible criteria for award of the VSM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, based on a review of the available...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026
AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPSs database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicants DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05127
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D) THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After careful consideration of applicants request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 28 Feb 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054
In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicants official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02704
This implies the applicants unit provided combat support to military operations in the AOE for award of the VSM. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in the AOE. As a member of the 964th Squadron during this time period of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04629
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04629 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty be corrected to reflect the following medals: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The RVNCM is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who, between 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73, served for...