Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04167
Original file (BC-2012-04167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04167 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His official records be changed to show he received the Air 
Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was awarded the AFCM after his release from active duty, but 
the paperwork and award were lost in a flood in 2001. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described 
in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice. The AFCM is awarded to member of the 
Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any 
capacity with the Air Force after 24 Mar 58, distinguished 
themselves by meritorious achievement and service. A thorough 
review of the applicant’s official military personnel records 
failed to reveal any evidence the applicant was recommended for 
or awarded the AFCM. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation, with attachments, 
is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 Nov 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04167 in Executive Session on 2 May 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04167 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Sep 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 3 Nov 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Nov 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03934

    Original file (BC-2012-03934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the requested medals. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02656

    Original file (BC 2013 02656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). In this case, a thorough review of the applicant’s official personnel records indicates that the special order awarding him an AFCM for the period 9 Jan 65...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04194

    Original file (BC-2012-04194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04194 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), and National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02648

    Original file (BC 2014 02648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02648 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), third Oak Leaf Custer. In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of the DÉCOR-6 rip, recommending him for the AFCM and a letter from his supervisor at the time, dated 24 Jun 14. The applicant’s official military personnel records reflect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03573

    Original file (BC-2012-03573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03573 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and all appropriate awards earned by the 37th Tactical Fighter Wing (TFW), Phu Cat AB, Republic of Vietnam. He was not considered for these awards because his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03520

    Original file (BC-2012-03520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    MRBP states that the AFDB considered the applicant (and another Air Force officer) for award of the AmnM on 7 Aug 2009 and disapproved the award, recommending downgrade to the AFCM for an act of courage. Also included in the file was the AFBCMR request for upgrade to the AmnM. The Board acknowledges the act of courage and personal sacrifices of the applicant on 6 Jan 2008; however, we believe his commander acted within his authority in determining the AFCM was the most appropriate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05375

    Original file (BC 2013 05375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05375 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The AF Form 973, Air Force Request and Authorization for Change of Administrative Orders, revoking her AFCM be removed from her military records. The original award approval authority has since revoked this decoration and AFPC/DPSID removed the medal from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), per AF Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03234

    Original file (BC 2012 03234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). Although the applicant’s APR, closing 29 May 73, confirms that he was recommended for the AFCM, the applicant’s records and the documentation he has provided in support of his appeal, do not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05779

    Original file (BC 2013 05779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05779 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his grade to SSgt on his DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05439

    Original file (BC 2013 05439 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his application as he has earned these medals and they should be reflected on his DD Form 214. According to his DD Form 214, he was awarded the VSM and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSID determined the applicant should have been awarded the AFCM, RVNGC w/P and VSM w/3 BSS for his service from 29 Oct 68 to 11 Sep 72.