RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________ ________________________________________ __________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4E (Grade is airman first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for a 6- year enlistees)), be changed so that he can be eligible to rejoin the military service. ___________ ________________________________________ __________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Honorable Discharge upon his separation from the Air Force. Although he was court-martialed, he was allowed to complete his required active duty service and therefore should be eligible to join the Air National Guard. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ___________ ________________________________________ __________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. Therefore, there is no need to describe these facts in this record of proceedings. ___________ ________________________________________ __________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant enlisted on 20 September 2005. He was demoted to Amn (E-2) on 15 October 2009 as part of his court-martial sentence. His RE code was updated to 4E since he was a first-term Airman with the grade of A1C or below. At the time of his Date of Separation (DOS), he was not eligible to stay in the Air Force because he held the rank of A1C. Ultimately, the applicant was demoted based on his own actions and he was appropriately discharged at his DOS and issued the RE code of 4E in accordance with the provisions of the governing instruction. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________ ________________________________________ __________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 03 August 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ___________ ________________________________________ __________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ___________ ________________________________________ __________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ___________ ________________________________________ __________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02791 in Executive Session on 7 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jun 12, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 26 Jul 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Aug 12. Panel Chair 3