Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02770
Original file (BC-2012-02770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02770 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His 4 Mar 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS), or 
his records be corrected to show he was exempt from the cardio 
component of said FA. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He had a medical condition (walking pneumonia) which precluded 
him from attaining a passing score on the contested FA. He had 
experienced shortness of breath prior to his FA, but attributed 
it to fatigue; however, while performing the cardio portion of 
the FA, he again experienced shortness of breath and was unable 
to successfully complete the run. A few weeks later he reported 
to the emergency room with similar symptoms and was diagnosed 
with walking pneumonia. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard in 
the rank of lieutenant colonel (0-5). 

 

On 4 Mar 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA, 
attaining a composite score of 62.10, resulting in an 
unsatisfactory assessment. The applicant was credited with 
29.90 points for cardio, 13.50 points for abdominal 
circumference, 10 points for push-ups and 8.70 points for sit-
ups. 

 

In order to receive a satisfactory rating the applicant needed 
to earn an overall composite score of 75 or greater along with 
the scores for each component area abdominal circumference 
measurement, push-ups and sit-ups. Military members receive a 
composite score on a 0 to 100 scale based on the following 
maximum component scores: 60 points for aerobic, 20 points for 


body composition, 10 points for push-ups and 10 points for sit-
ups. 

 

On 23 Apr 12, the applicant was diagnosed with walking pneumonia 
and the medical provider recommended the contested FA be voided 
and he be allowed to retest 42 days following medical clearance. 
The applicant was prohibited participating in physical training 
from 5 Apr 12 until 17 May 12. 

 

On 10 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide 
additional documentation to substantiate his claim, specifically 
an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report (DLC), and AF 
Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention 
Processing. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating that Airman who become 
ill or injured during the FA and are unable to complete all the 
components of the FA will have the option of being evaluated by 
the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF); however, the FA will still 
count unless the unit commander renders the test invalid. The 
applicant has provided documentation indicating he had a medical 
condition that may have precluded him from successfully 
completing the cardio component of the FA. Although these 
documents indicate a medical condition existed and prohibited 
him from physical training from 5 Apr through 17 May 12, they do 
not substantiate that he was not cleared to participate in the 
contested FA. Further, the FA in question was not invalidated 
by the unit commander, nor has the applicant provided any 
evidence showing the commander concurred with the recommendation 
of the medical provider. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 Apr 13, for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
We note the Air Force OPR requested additional documentation 
from the applicant to help evaluate the merits of his claim; 
however, he failed to respond. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02770 in Executive Session on 13 Jun 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Jun 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 9 Apr 13, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Apr 13. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03517

    Original file (BC 2013 03517 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She sent medical documentation to her medical unit prior to the contested FA that should have exempted her from components of the assessment. On 19 Apr 13, the applicant provided a “Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance” signed by her medical provider and indicating that she was medically cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443

    Original file (BC 2013 05443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05443 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a “Medical Determination” letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738

    Original file (BC 2013 02738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01179

    Original file (BC-2012-01179.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio component of his Fitness Assessment score dated 1 February 2012, be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441

    Original file (BC 2013 04441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.” A list of the applicant’s last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468

    Original file (BC 2013 04468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commander’s invalidation, AF Form 422, etc.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714

    Original file (BC 2013 04714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833

    Original file (BC 2013 05833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01210

    Original file (BC-2012-01210.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s commander, by letter dated 14 Mar 12, requests the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score be removed from his records or nullified. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial to remove the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score from the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220

    Original file (BC 2013 03220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...