RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02751
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded
to Honorable.
____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Enough time has passed that she should be considered for an
upgrade to her discharge. She was young at the time and made an
error in not making the Air Force a lifetime career.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
____________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records indicate she enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 31 Jul 89.
On 16 Nov 90, the applicant was furnished a General (Under
Honorable Conditions) discharge under the provisions of AFR 39-
10, Administrative Separation of Airmen, for Misconduct-Pattern
Conduct Prejudicial To Good Order and Discipline, and was
credited with 1 year, 3 months, and 16 days of total active
service.
On 10 Dec 12, a request for post-service information was
forwarded to the applicant; however, as of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or
injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on
the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or
disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of
justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of
clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the
applicants activities since leaving the service, we find no
basis to recommend the relief sought on that basis. Therefore,
in view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to grant the relief
sought in this application.
____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
____________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02751 in Executive Session on 28 Feb 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jun 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Dec 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05207
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPSIT states that in accordance with 38 USC, Chapter 33, Section 3319(f), an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed. The applicant retired from the Air Force on 16 Sep 2005; therefore, she was not eligible to transfer benefits to her dependents since...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05170
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05170 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable, so she may reenter the Air Force or another branch of the Armed Forces. On 24 Jan 07, the Deputy Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the case file and found it legally sufficient to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05896
DPSIM states that the evidence provided by the applicant substantiates a medical condition existed that restricted her from performing all components of the FA except the abdominal circumference. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04980
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04980 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for Tranfer of her Post-9/11 Educational Benefits (TEB) be corrected to reflect 26 Jan 14, instead of 25 Sep 15. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05795
Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05795
Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00755
An evaluation officer reviewed the applicants case and recommended she be discharged from the Air Force and furnished a general discharge for an apathetic and defective attitude only after being considered for rehabilitation. On 27 Mar 81, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and was credited with 1 year and 16 days of total active service. On 28 Apr 82, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered the applicants request to upgrade her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02783
On 10 Dec 70, the Air Force Military Personnel Center (AFMPC) reviewed the case and recommended disapproval stating there was insufficient justification to support a waiver of the one year ADSC. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00046
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-00046 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 29 March 2010 and 18 December 2009 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 13 February 2012, AFPC/DPSIMC wrote to the applicant requesting documentation to substantiate her claim,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03412
DPTT has no record of ever receiving her election form. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.