Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01507
Original file (BC-2012-01507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01507 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education 
benefits to his dependents. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While he was on active duty he was not able to transfer his 
remaining education benefits to his youngest son because he was 
not 18 years old. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with an attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former Air Force Reserve member who was 
transferred to the Retired Reserve on 25 May 10. 

 

The website for the transfer of Post-9/11 GI Benefits states any 
member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, 
officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for 
the Post-9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the 
Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a 
specified additional period of duty in the Armed Forces from the 
date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their 
dependents. 

 

An individual approved to transfer an entitlement to educational 
assistance under Post-9/11 may transfer their entitlement to: 
The individual's spouse; one or more of the individual’s 
children, any combination of spouse and child, a family member 
must be enrolled in the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting 
System (DEERS) and be eligible for benefits, at the time of 
transfer to receive transferred educational benefits. 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/A1YR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or injustice. There is not an age limit for how young a 
dependent can be, to be designated by the service member to 
receive Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits. The Transfer of 
Education Benefits (TEB) website pulls its dependent data from 
the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS). Any 
child dependent (except for legal Wards) listed in DEERS from 
ages newborn to 20 years old, if not a full-time student in 
college, or ages 21 years to 22 years, if full time college 
student, may be designated to receive the education benefits. 

 

The complete NGB/A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 19 Jun 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-01507 in Executive Session on 11 Feb 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Acting Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1YR, dated 22 May 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Acting Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04059

    Original file (BC 2014 04059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04059 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His ability to transfer any/all remaining Post 9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his daughter be restored. While we acknowledge the applicant’s request to transfer Post- 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter, we do not believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02762

    Original file (BC-2011-02762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. If he can provide documentation showing he attempted to change his daughter's status in DEERs prior to retiring and the Board finds there was injustice, NGB/RS recommends approval of his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GJ Bill education benefits to his dependent. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01300

    Original file (BC-2012-01300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in thePost-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. While we note the comments of NGB/A1PSindicating the applicant’s squadron did not receive the Post9/11 GI Bill Informational Briefing until after the applicanthad retired, we also note the applicant never out-processedthrough the Retention Office Manager (ROM),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016282

    Original file (20100016282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official notes the applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post 9-11 GI Bill transferability program to his daughter. The evidence shows the applicant's daughter was over 23 years of age at the time the applicant requested transfer of benefits and she was not an eligible dependent in DEERS. Therefore, considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019459

    Original file (20110019459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By Public Law 110-252, only eligible children and/or spouses enrolled in DEERS are eligible to receive the transferred benefits and the Soldier must transfer the benefits while a member of the Selected Reserve or a Regular Army Soldier. There is no evidence the applicant took all necessary steps to ensure the adopted child was enrolled in DEERS during the period the applicant was eligible for the transfer and he attempted to transfer the benefit prior to leaving active or Reserve military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00413

    Original file (BC-2012-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008021

    Original file (20120008021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was uninformed that education benefits must be transferred to dependents before they reached 23 years of age * his oldest child, his daughter Natasha, reached 23 years of age on 13 January 2012 * he attempted to transfer his benefits to her on 12 April 2012 * Natasha was displayed on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website, yet labeled ineligible * information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website states dependents can use transferred benefits between 18 and 26 years of age * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004291

    Original file (20120004291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to two of his four dependents. The applicant had more than 27 years of service upon retirement; therefore, he was eligible to transfer to two of his four dependents. The Transfer of Education (TEB) online database shows the applicant had four dependents enrolled in DEERS as of 29 February 2012, his last day in service; however, two dependents were ineligible to receive benefits in DEERS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007881

    Original file (20120007881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for VA Education Benefits, dated 30 August 2007, that shows the applicant applied for his Reserve Educational Assistance Program (REAP) educational benefits. The criteria for a service member to be eligible for the transfer of entitlement option requires that he or she be on active duty on 1 August 2009; however our records indicate (the applicant) was discharged from the Army Reserve on 12 April 2003; therefore, he is no longer eligible to apply for the TOE [transfer of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002363

    Original file (20140002363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was unable to transfer her Post 9-11 GI Bill educational benefits to her son, T____, because he turned 23 years old 6 days prior to the date she submitted the request. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's son's DOB was 22 January 1991 and he turned 23 years of age on 22 January 2014. Although eligible family member status can be extended from age 21 to age 23 if they are a full-time student and unmarried, there is no evidence that shows the applicant ever submitted a request...