Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01500
Original file (BC-2012-01500.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01500 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His DD Form 214 be amended to reflect the Vietnam Service Medal 
(VSM). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
On 2 April 2008, it was confirmed that he had boots-on-the-ground 
in the Republic of Vietnam and was issued a corrected copy of his 
DD Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty. 
 
In  support  of  the  applicant’s  appeal,  he  provides  documents 
extracted from his military personnel records. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  1  December 
1960. 
 
On 31 March 1981, the applicant retired in the grade of master 
sergeant under the provisions of AFR 35-7, Voluntary – Retirement 
for Years of Service Established By Law.  He served 20 years and 
4 months on active duty. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIDRA  recommends  denial.    DPSIDRA  states  there  is  no 
documentation to determine if the applicant served in Vietnam for 
at least 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days. 
 
The  Air  Force  Personnel  Center,  Directorate  of  Assignments, 
confirmed  boots-on-the-ground in Vietnam based on an eyewitness 
who  recounted  a  brief  encounter  with  the  applicant  on  one 
occasion  at  Tan  Son  Nhut  Air  Base,  Vietnam,  sometime  between 
August 1970 and August 1971.  The applicant’s evaluation report 
 
 

closing  13  May  1971  reflects  that  he  was  serving  on  temporary 
duty (TDY) as a Sky Marshall during Operation GRIDSQUARE during 
this period. 
 
Although the applicant may have flown in and out of the area of 
Vietnam while serving as a Sky Marshall, he was not serving in 
Vietnam, directly supporting the mission in Vietnam.  Operation 
GRIDSQUARE was a program conducted by the Department of Defense 
to  assist  the  Department  of  Transportation  in  screening, 
training, deploying, and supervising military personnel from all 
services  (Army,  Navy,  Air  Force,  and  Marine  Corps),  who 
voluntarily participated as Federal Air Security Specialists (Sky 
Marshalls)  to  combat  air  piracy  in  response  to  a  rash  of 
political hijackings of U.S. commercial aircraft. 
 
The applicant provided an eyewitness statement confirming a brief 
encounter which took place in Vietnam.  This statement was used 
by  the  Directorate  of  Assignments  to  confirm  the  applicant  had 
boots  on  ground  in  Vietnam;  however,  it  does  not  indicate  the 
length of time served or to whom he was assigned. 
 
The DPSIDRA complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit 
C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
The applicant states that he served as an Air Marshall during the 
contested time frame.  The FAA made it clear to all Air Marshalls 
that  in  order  to  maintain  the  integrity  of  a  mission;  Air 
Marshalls would travel throughout the globe without the benefit 
of  written  orders.    He  flew  to  Vietnam  while  on  a  mission  and 
while  there  he  visited  with  a  friend,  who  has  provided  a 
statement in support of his appeal in 2008.  The criteria for the 
VSM  states  that  it  may  be  awarded  to  all  members  of  the  U.S. 
Armed  Forces….Serving  at  any  time  between  4  July  1965  and 
28 March  1973,  in  Vietnam,  its  contiguous  waters,  or  airspace 
there-over.  He believes very strongly that he was indeed a bona 
fide  member  of  the  Armed  Forces,  proudly  serving  his  country, 
like the many men and women serving their country in support of 
combat  operations  in  Vietnam.    In  addition,  although  there  may 
not  have  been  an  actual  engagement  with  an  enemy,  the  mere 
presence of U.S. Sky Marshalls aboard a U.S. Commercial aircraft, 
might  have  had  a  significant  deterrent  affect  discouraging  the 
enemy from carrying out a catastrophic act against resources of 
the  United  States  of  America,  as  was  evident  on  September  11, 
2001. 
 
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 

2 
 

 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    The 
applicant’s  contentions  are  duly  noted;  however,  we  agree  with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or  injustice.    We  took  note  that  a  correction  was  made  to  the 
applicant’s  DD  Form  214  to  reflect  boots-on–the-ground  in 
Vietnam;  however,  the  amount  of  foreign  service  performed  in 
Vietnam  could  not  be  verified.    Therefore,  in  the  absence  of 
documentation to determine if the applicant served in Vietnam for 
at  least  30  consecutive  or  60  non-consecutive  days,  we  find  no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01500  in  Executive  Session  on  16  October  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01500 was considered: 
 
  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 March 2012, w/atchs. 
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 14 May 2012. 
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 24 May 2012. 
  Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 11 June 2012. 
 
 
 
 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01922

    Original file (BC-2011-01922.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01922 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Medal (AM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). Neither the applicant’s submission or his military personnel records contain enough official documentation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02514

    Original file (BC-2012-02514.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be added to his records and he be issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and any other awards related to service in Vietnam. Based on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02637

    Original file (BC-2011-02637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CRM is awarded to U.S. Air Force, U.S. Air Force Reserve Service members, and Service members of other Services after 1 Aug 1960, for sustained individual combat or mission readiness or preparedness for direct weapon-system employment. According to the applicant's official military record, he was awarded the VSM with two Bronze Service Stars (w/2 BSS) for his service in Vietnam from 26 Feb 1972 to 21 Apr 1972. The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04259

    Original file (BC 2013 04259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID is unable to determine the dates and locations for the applicant's TDY to Vietnam; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for award of the AFEM, VSM, or the VCM during the award inclusive periods. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013- 04259 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04630

    Original file (BC-2011-04630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for a head injury received during a rocket attack while on temporary duty (TDY) to Da Nang Air Base (AB) Republic of Vietnam. The complete AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at exhibit D. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force Evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 24 February 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01746

    Original file (BC-2012-01746.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant served in units during their award periods for the RVNGC w/P, which would imply...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00589

    Original file (BC-2012-00589.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00589 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. f. Any unit awards for time served in Vietnam. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05048

    Original file (BC-2011-05048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDRA states the applicant’s dates of assignment in Thailand were well after the ending date of 28 March 1973 for award of either the VSM or the RVCM; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for award of the VSM or the RVCM based on the inclusive period of the award. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, in Vietnam, its contiguous waters or airspace there-over and to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00178

    Original file (BC-2012-00178.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, a copy of a document extracted from his military personnel records and a notarized letter from a former coworker attesting to his service in the Republic of Vietnam. No documentation was provided to verify the applicant served in Vietnam, or any area for which the VSM is authorized for the specified period of time. We believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam based on the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01274

    Original file (BC-2012-01274.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR states based on the applicant’s duties and responsibilities as an aircraft mechanic, his duty location (Okinawa, Japan), and the fact his DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the VSM and RVCM, the likelihood of his having served in direct support of military operations supporting Vietnam is highly likely. This document is not inherently part of Air Force members’ personnel records; therefore, this documentation is not always...