Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04691
Original file (BC-2011-04691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04691 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be 
upgraded to a General (Under Honorable Conditions). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was falsely accused by the Air Force Office of Special 
Investigation (AFOSI) for having and using illegal drugs. He 
was never given a drug test to validate usage of drugs. Even 
though he denied any use of illegal substances and was allowed 
to continue his professional business in the Air Force, he was 
turned over to Japanese authorities about two months later. The 
Japanese police treated him badly and he was subjected to 
physical abuse. He tried for a long time to tell them he did 
not have or use any drugs. They produced what they stated were 
drugs found in his room on base and continued the pressure until 
he decided to falsely confess that he used and possessed drugs. 
No drugs were found when he was first arrested in his room on 
base. As young as he was and scared for his life, what else 
could he do? 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the 
Armed Forces of the United States. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Air Force on 25 Mar 81. 

 

On 30 Sep 82, while stationed in Japan, the applicant’s 
commander notified him he was recommending he be discharged from 
the Air Force due to a civil court conviction. The court 
conviction was for illegal possession of approximately 12 grams 
of marijuana. In addition, he had previously received non-
judicial punishment (Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military 


Justice) on three occasions: 1) 11 May 82, for failure to go to 
his appointed place of duty; 2) 15 Jul 82, for wrongful 
possession of codeine and valium; 3) 20 Aug 82, for wrongful 
possession of codeine. 

 

On 12 Oct 82, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action 
and elected to exercise his right to a hearing before an 
administrative discharge board. The administrative discharge 
board met on 5 Nov 82 and recommended the applicant be furnished 
a UOTHC discharge without probation or rehabilitation. 

 

On 17 Dec 82, the case was found legally sufficient. On 21 Dec 
82, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished 
an UOTHC discharge without probation and rehabilitation. 

 

On 28 Jan 83, the applicant was furnished an UOTHC discharge for 
misconduct—civil court conviction and credited with one year, 
ten months, and four days of total active service. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, 
which is at Exhibit C. 

 

On 5 Mar 11, a copy of the FBI Report and a request for post-
service information were forwarded to the applicant for review 
and comment within 30 days. In response, the applicant provides 
an expanded statement, a statement from his mother, and copies 
of four letters of support (Exhibit E). 

 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. 
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the 
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or 
disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of 
justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of 
clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is 
sufficient for us to recommend granting the relief sought on 
that basis at this time. Therefore, in the absence of evidence 


to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to grant the 
relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with the 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04691 in Executive Session on 5 Jun 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Nov 11, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. FBI Report. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 5 Mar 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 May 12, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01588

    Original file (BC-2006-01588.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 12 June 1985, applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting her UOTHC discharge to be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The AFDRB considered all the evidence of record and concluded the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00882

    Original file (BC-2006-00882.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Feb 82, in a Waiver of Disposition Board Proceedings, the applicant voluntarily indicated he no longer wished to participate in the 3320th Correction and Rehabilitation Squadron (CRS) Program at Lowry AFB, CO. On 4 Mar 82, the 3320 CRS commander notified the applicant he was recommending a general discharge for failure to complete the Rehabilitation Program and because of evidence of misconduct documented in the applicant’s military record. After 2 years, 10 months, and 15 days of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-004083

    Original file (BC-2010-004083.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04083 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00868

    Original file (BC-2012-00868.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00868 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 2098, Duty Status Change, dated 24 Jul 90, be declared void and removed from his records. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we do not find the applicant’s arguments or the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00785

    Original file (BC-2008-00785.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00785 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, not dated. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 30 Apr 08.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03103

    Original file (BC-2007-03103.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03103 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His characterization of service be upgraded from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04921

    Original file (BC-2011-04921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 Feb 95, the findings and recommendations of the administrative discharge board were found legally sufficient and, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished a UOTHC discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report which is attached at Exhibit C. A copy of the FBI Investigative Report and a request for post- service information was forwarded to the applicant on 3 Jul 12 (Exhibit D). We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02029

    Original file (BC 2013 02029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For these reasons, this Board very carefully weighs requests to upgrade the character of a discharge and, in doing so, carefully considers whether the impact of an applicant's contributions to his or her community are substantial enough for us to conclude they overcome the misconduct which precipitated the discharge and whether or not an upgrade of the discharge would create a larger injustice to those who served under honorable conditions and earned the characterization of service the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01842

    Original file (BC-2008-01842.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The majority of the Board concludes the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of establishing the discharge proceedings were improper and the characterization of the discharge was inappropriate based on the existing circumstances. The following documentary evidence was considered under Docket Number BC-2006- 01842: Exhibit A. DD Form 149,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03875

    Original file (BC-2005-03875.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03875 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUNE 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...