Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00313
Original file (BC-2012-00313.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
 
 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00313 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
In Feb 68, while serving in Tan An, Long An Province, Republic 
of  Vietnam,  he  was  injured  during  combat.  After  the  battle 
occurred,  he  treated  civilian  casualties  non-stop  for  three  to 
six days.  The injury to his right knee was sustainable to allow 
him to continue his duties as a Corpsmen.  He did not follow-up 
due to the sheer volume of casualties. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD  Form  214,  Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of 
Transfer  or  Discharge,  a  letter  from  his  former  commanding 
officer,  AF  Commendation  Medal  (AFCM)  certificate,  and  other 
documents associated with his request.   
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On  9  Jun  64,  the  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force.  
He  served  four  years,  one  month  and  two  days  of  total  active 
federal service.   
 
The  applicant’s  commanding  officer  at  the  time  of  the  attack, 
Captain  C,  provided  a  statement  in  support  of  the  applicant’s 
claim.    He  states  the  applicant  collided  with  an  obstruction. 
The  applicant  thought  he  may  have  received  shrapnel  from  an 
enemy  rocket;  however,  Captain  C  did  not  locate  any  shrapnel 
fragments.  Captain C stated when it came time to consider the 
applicant for award of the PH, they were not absolutely sure if 
his  wound  was  the  result  of  hostile  fire;  therefore,  the 
paperwork was never filed.  Additionally, Captain C states after 
his  recent  contact  with  the  applicant,  he  now  realizes  he  most 
likely  deserved  the  award  of  the  PH  and  felt  it  would  only  be 
fair to recommend him for the award.  
 

The PH is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces 
who have been wounded, killed or who have died or may hereafter 
die of wounds received in action against an enemy of the United 
States or opposing force as a result of an act of any such enemy 
or  opposing  armed  force,  an  international  terrorist  attack  or 
during  military  operations  while  serving  as  part  of  a 
peacekeeping  force.    A  wound  for  which  the  award  is  made  must 
have  required  treatment,  not  merely  examination,  by  a  medical 
officer.    Additionally,  treatment  of  the  wound  shall  be 
documented in the Service member’s medical and/or health record.  
Award  of  the  PH  may  be  made  for  wounds  treated  by  a  medical 
professional  other  than  a  medical  officer,  provided  a  medical 
officer  includes  a  statement  in  the  Service  member’s  medical 
record that the extent of the wounds were such that they would 
have  required  treatment  by  a  medical  officer  if  one  had  been 
available to treat them.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ  AFPC/DPSIDR  recommends  denial.    DPSIDR  states  there  were  no 
medical  records  located  or  documentation  to  support  the 
applicant’s request.   
 
On  26  Apr  12,  the  applicant’s  request  was  disapproved  by  the 
Purple Heart Review Board.   
 
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  11  May  12  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days 
(Exhibit  C).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  not  received  a 
response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record we are not persuaded 
that  he  has  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.  
Therefore,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and  recommendation  of  the 

 

2

 

Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  and  adopt  its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    The  personal 
sacrifice the applicant endured for his country is noted and our 
decision  in  no  way  diminishes  the  high  regard  we  have  for  his 
service;  however,  insufficient  documentary  evidence  has  been 
presented  to  substantiate  that  he  has  a  qualifying  injury  that 
warrants  award  of  the  PH.    In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the 
contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief 
sought in this application. 
 _________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  Docket  Number    
BC-2012-00313  in  Executive  Session  on  18  Jul  12,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
Panel Chair 
 
Member 
 
Member 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Jan 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 2 May 12. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 

  
  
  

 
 
 

 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02388

    Original file (BC-2011-02388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A detailed personal account of the circumstances surrounding the injury is required to include specifics as to how the injury occurred, exact date of injury, unit of assignment, and rank held at the time of the injury. DPSIDR states they were unable to locate medical documentation in the applicant’s military personnel file that supports a claim of an injury he sustained in Vietnam. He also states he cannot recall the exact day of the attack that occurred at Ton Son Nhut Air Base, Republic...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04198

    Original file (BC-2011-04198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided an abbreviated account of the circumstances surrounding the incident, but did not provide eyewitness statements or medical records. There was no medical documentation provided or located in the applicant's records and no indication that the physical incapacitation was related to his hand injury. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 9 Feb 2012,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02592

    Original file (BC-2011-02592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluation prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request based on the lack of evidence establishing the aircraft crash was combat related. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04220

    Original file (BC-2011-04220.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04220 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries he received in an automobile accident while on temporary duty (TDY) in Feb 1951. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05125

    Original file (BC-2011-05125.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05125 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Insufficient relevant evidence has been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02307

    Original file (BC-2010-02307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he was awarded: a. The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence which would lead us...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00499

    Original file (BC-2012-00499.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has never had possession of his medical records and is not aware if his wartime injuries were included. While the evidence provided does support the applicant was participating in a combat mission and subsequently received medical treatment after his aircraft crashed, unfortunately, the evidence available to us is not sufficient to determine that the aircraft crash was caused by enemy shrapnel. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04155

    Original file (BC-2011-04155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04155 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The applicant provided as evidence an eyewitness statement, which gives the date of the injury as 6 June 1944, and the site of the injuries as the former service member’s leg. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01204

    Original file (BC-2007-01204.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the application be denied as untimely. To be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he or she was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and the wounds must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04396

    Original file (BC-2010-04396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While serving in Nha Trang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, he was injured while seeking cover during a mortar attack. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that his injuries were the direct result of enemy action or friendly fire as required for award of the PH. ...